<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://jimhillmedia.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Pixar TV special you never got to see, &amp;quot;A Tin Toy Christmas&amp;quot;</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2007/12/14/tube-thursday-the-pixar-holiday-special-you-never-got-to-see-tin-toy-christmas.aspx</link><description>Jim Hill shares what he's learned about this abandoned project. Which (in a roundabout way) provided the inspiration for Pixar Animation Studios' first feature-length production, "Toy Story"</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61019.2)</generator><item><title>Hoybrown.Com &amp;raquo; The Pixar TV special you never got to see, &amp;quot;A Tin Toy Christmas&amp;quot;</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2007/12/14/tube-thursday-the-pixar-holiday-special-you-never-got-to-see-tin-toy-christmas.aspx#13561</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:40:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6eae8b7-6313-4d41-ad2e-eb83602357af:13561</guid><dc:creator>Jim Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hoybrown.com/?p=3624"&gt;http://www.hoybrown.com/?p=3624&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: The Pixar TV special you never got to see, &quot;A Tin Toy Christmas&quot;</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2007/12/14/tube-thursday-the-pixar-holiday-special-you-never-got-to-see-tin-toy-christmas.aspx#13585</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:37:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6eae8b7-6313-4d41-ad2e-eb83602357af:13585</guid><dc:creator>Jim Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What? No comments yet? Jim, this is the sort of stuff that makes your site unique. I would love to see a future Pixar flick based on Tinny! Keep up the good work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: The Pixar TV special you never got to see, &quot;A Tin Toy Christmas&quot;</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2007/12/14/tube-thursday-the-pixar-holiday-special-you-never-got-to-see-tin-toy-christmas.aspx#13603</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:52:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6eae8b7-6313-4d41-ad2e-eb83602357af:13603</guid><dc:creator>Jim Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article. &amp;nbsp;I knew a lot of that already, but it was interesting to learn the connection between 'Nightmare' and 'Toy Story'.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, you missed the key point that made the Pixar deal viable for Disney and would lead to trouble down the road: Pixar got basically the *same* deal as Burton, which included Disney ownership of the film/characters/etc. &amp;nbsp;While this was, obviously, the only way Disney would have backed 'Toy Story', it did prove to be the sticking point when the production deal was coming to an end. &amp;nbsp;Disney refused to sell 'Nightmare' to Tim Burton, and there was no way they were going to allow Pixar to get their hands on 'Toy Story', et. al. &amp;nbsp;(a key demand from Steve Jobs). &amp;nbsp;Like the Burton production, the only way Pixar would get control over their Disney films was to &amp;quot;bring them in&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;In the case of Burton, it just meant doing the film for Disney/Touchstone. &amp;nbsp;In the case of Pixar, it meant Disney buying the studio.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>