<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://jimhillmedia.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>&amp;quot;The Pixar Touch&amp;quot; shares seldom-told tales about the early days of this animation studio</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2008/05/15/the-pixar-touch-shares-seldom-told-tales-about-the-early-days-of-this-animation-studio.aspx</link><description>Jim Hill talks with author David A. Price about how he went about writing this unauthorized history of Pixar Animation Studios</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61019.2)</generator><item><title>  Quando la Pixar pensava a Monkey &amp;#8212; The Director&amp;#8217;s Cup &amp;#8212; Cinema News all&amp;#8217;ora di colazione</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2008/05/15/the-pixar-touch-shares-seldom-told-tales-about-the-early-days-of-this-animation-studio.aspx#15537</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 03:10:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6eae8b7-6313-4d41-ad2e-eb83602357af:15537</guid><dc:creator>Jim Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.directorscup.it/2008/05/15/quando-la-pixar-pensava-a-monkey/"&gt;http://www.directorscup.it/2008/05/15/quando-la-pixar-pensava-a-monkey/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: &quot;The Pixar Touch&quot; shares seldom-told tales about the early days of this animation studio</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2008/05/15/the-pixar-touch-shares-seldom-told-tales-about-the-early-days-of-this-animation-studio.aspx#15543</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:25:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6eae8b7-6313-4d41-ad2e-eb83602357af:15543</guid><dc:creator>Jim Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;While I haven't read this book, I did see the &amp;quot;Pixar Story&amp;quot;. I REALLY enjoyed it and would definetly buy it on DVD, but it was definitely the &amp;quot;Disney fairy tale story&amp;quot; of Pixar. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like when George Lucas said he sold it because he didn't have the money to make a full length animated movie (which was like $20 mil). Of course he had like $50 mil to make Star Wars Ep 1!! And I heard the REAL story was he needed the cash for his divorce settlement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So an unauthorized version would be nice too. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: &quot;The Pixar Touch&quot; shares seldom-told tales about the early days of this animation studio</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2008/05/15/the-pixar-touch-shares-seldom-told-tales-about-the-early-days-of-this-animation-studio.aspx#15545</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:15:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6eae8b7-6313-4d41-ad2e-eb83602357af:15545</guid><dc:creator>Jim Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The Pixar Story&amp;quot; did quite a job in its 88-minute running time -- and I think it glanced at many of the stuggles, even if it wasn't too deeply. Karen Paik's book does a better job digging into that material -- much of it based on the hours and hours of raw interview footage shot by Leslie Iwerks. The two work very well in tandem for those interested in getting a sense of the larger picture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, I'm very much looking forward to reading Price's book and getting an even deeper appreciation of the world's top animation powerhouse and its humble and beleagured beginnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My interest grew even more intense when Price said that many of the people no longer working for Pixar Animation Studios actually have a deeper appreciation of the company than those still in the trenches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be a great read (and less expensive that Paik's book), but both books and the documentary film are all pieces to the puzzle and worth consideration by anyone looking to have a better understanding and appreciation of Pixar.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: &quot;The Pixar Touch&quot; shares seldom-told tales about the early days of this animation studio</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2008/05/15/the-pixar-touch-shares-seldom-told-tales-about-the-early-days-of-this-animation-studio.aspx#15577</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:09:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6eae8b7-6313-4d41-ad2e-eb83602357af:15577</guid><dc:creator>Jim Hill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jim,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good piece, I just wanted to suggest that you shake things up a bit and use a phrase other than &amp;quot;the Emeryville-based studio&amp;quot;. It was used twice in this article alone. Most of your loyal readers know the studio is based in Emeryville by now. If you want to use something other than &amp;quot;Pixar&amp;quot; to describe &amp;quot;Pixar,&amp;quot; how about &amp;quot;The computer animation giant&amp;quot; &amp;quot;the birthplace of Toy Story,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The studio that toys built,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Lasseter's Cinematic Playground&amp;quot; or anything other than &amp;quot;the Emeryville-based studio&amp;quot; :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>