<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://jimhillmedia.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>When it comes to the Disney / Pixar merger, does &amp;quot;Happily Ever After&amp;quot; come at too high a price?</title><link>http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2006/01/25/742.aspx</link><description>Jim Hill examines some of the more troubling aspects of the Pixar acquisition deal. In particular the possibility that Disney may have over-paid for that animation studio. Not to mention the impact that this merger may have on the staff of WDFA</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61019.2)</generator></channel></rss>