Were you surprised by the rather generic-sounding new name that the Walt Disney Company saddled Disney-MGM with last week?
Well, you weren't the only one. Many of the Mouse House managers that I spoke with over this past weekend were really taken aback by the studio theme park's new moniker. As one Disney vet who-prefers-to-remain-anonymous put it:
"I've been in meetings where we talked about Disney-Pixar Studios, Disney-ABC Studios, Walt Disney Studios, even Disney Studios Florida. But Disney's Hollywood Studios? I'd never heard that name before. Marketing must have pulled that one out of a hat at the last minute." Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved
"I've been in meetings where we talked about Disney-Pixar Studios, Disney-ABC Studios, Walt Disney Studios, even Disney Studios Florida. But Disney's Hollywood Studios? I'd never heard that name before. Marketing must have pulled that one out of a hat at the last minute."
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved
And that may genuinely be the case. Given that -- while WDW resort president Meg Crofton officially announced this name change on August 9th -- Disney's IT department didn't actually begin registering variations of the "Disney's Hollywood Studios" domain name 'til August 4th. With the first six names ...
... being registered on Saturday, August 4th. While the remaining 11 ...
... were snagged by Mickey on Monday, August 6th.
Does that sound kind of the last minute to you? It should. These days, the Walt Disney Company tries to lock up domain names that it's interested in years in advance. Take -- for example ...
This is the name of a ficticious organization that figures prominently in Disney / Pixar's Summer 2009 release, "Up." And yet the Mouse is already so concerned that someone might come along and snag domain names that are somehow related to this new Pete Docter film, they actually registered "wildernessranger.com" back on June 13th. A full two years before this new Pixar Animation Studios production is expected to be released to theater.
Anyway ... After you apply this particular piece of information to last week's announcement, does it strike you as odd that the Walt Disney Company would only be moving to acquire all of these "Disney's Hollywood Studios" -related domain names variations less than a week before the official Disney-MGM name change announcement?
Well, it really should. Given that, up until late last month, Disney-MGM actually was going to be renamed Disney-Pixar Studios. But then the results of that survey that I discussed in Friday's "Why For" column came in. And then -- of course -- there was the problem that this studio theme park hasn't been a working motion picture studio for quite a while now.
Oh, sure. Back when the Disney-MGM Studio Tour project was initially announced back in March of 1986, Disney Company officials really did have visions of turning this particular chunk of swampland into Hollywood East. Where Tinsel Town types could then come shoot their movies & TV programs for about 2/3rds of what it cost to shoot similiar shows back in really-for-real Hollywood.
And -- for a while there, anyway -- it did look like this plan might actually work. That Mouse House managers would be able to convince industry types to first fly down to Central Florida to shoot their films, and then charge tourists for the privilege of peeking behind-the-scenes.
But as it turns out ... In spite of the lure of those lower production costs (Not to mention all of those tax breaks / credits that the Florida Film Commission was always dangling on front of producers who were talking about shooting in the Sunshine State), in the end, not enough movies & TV shows were actually willing to come all the way down to Orlando in order to shoot. Which meant (more often than thought) that those tourists who went on MGM's Backstage Tour wound up looking down onto dark & empty soundstages.
Speaking of which ... It turned out that those glassed-in, sound-proofed tour corridors that ran across the length of Soundstages 1, 2 & 3 turned out to be a huge turn-off for many film-makers. They honestly didn't like the idea of the great unwashed looking down upon them as they created cinematic art.
Which is why -- for a time there in the early 1990s -- the Walt Disney Company actually toyed with building four more soundstages on the other side of World Drive. These additional production facilities (Which were to be built in the very same spot that Disney's Coronado Springs Resort currently occupies) were deliberately designed to be as far away from the tourists as possible. And the plan was that the Mouse would offer this state-of-the-art work space to film-makers at a significantly reduced rate if they'd then agreed to shoot a few token scenes for their films back on the soundstages that featured the glassed-in overhead tour corridor.
But -- in the end -- cooler heads prevailed back in Burbank. And it stood to reason that if Disney was already struggling to find movies & TV shows to shoot on the three soundstages that the company already had in Central Florida ... Well, adding four other soundstages was just going to compound Disney-MGM's pre-existing problem.
So -- in the end -- the Walt Disney Company just stopped chasing the dream of turning WDW's studio theme park into Hollywood East. And to fill all of those empty soundstages along Mickey Avenue, MGM officials were ultimately forced to do things like bring the "Pocahontas" mall tour in for an extended visit, create a new Mickey meet-n-greet area as well as build the "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire -- Play It!" game theater.
But nowadays ... With the exception of the occasional holiday special and/or on-location shoot for "Wheel of Fortune," the Mouse has basically abandoned the idea that any TV shows or films of significance will ever be shot at Disney-MGM. Which is why the company is now perfectly comfortable with turning Soundstages 1, 2 & 3 into show buildings for "Toy Story Mania !" as well as that yet-to-officially-be-announced Pixar-themed Wild Mouse coaster.
Which now brings us back to that "Disney's Hollywood Studios" name. Several Mouse House managers that I spoke with this past weekend floated the theory that Disney execs finally chose this name because they're looking to eventually pull an "Epcot 94."
To explain: How many of you remember -- as part of the revamping of Future World that was done back in the early 1990s (You know? When Communicore was gutted to make way for Innoventions?) -- that the name of WDW's science & discovery park was officially changed from Epcot Center to Epcot 94? This nonsense continued for another year (With all of the signage in the park actually being changed to Epcot 95) before Disney World officials finally settled on calling the resort's 2nd theme park plain old Epcot.
Sooo ... Applying that same logic to what's just happened to Disney-MGM ... The folks that I've just spoken with believe that "Disney's Hollywood Studios" is just an interim name. That this new moniker will only remain in place until the Imagineers have effectively replaced all of the studio theme park's soundstages & production facilities with new rides, shows and attraction. At that point -- when "Disney's Hollywood Studios" can no longer be called a working studio -- the name of WDW's 3rd theme park will change one last time to "Disney's Hollywood."
Don't believe me? Well, please note that -- of the 17 variations of "Disney's Hollywood Studios" domain names that I've listed above -- five of those names do riff on "Disney's Hollywood."
Of course, it's important to note here that this last name change is at least three to five years down the line. We'll have to wait 'til "Disney's Hollywood Studios" has gone ahead with its new "lands" scenario (i.e. Where specific areas of this theme park will then be dedicated to the celebration of the Playhouse Disney characters, Pixar's films, the Muppets and George Lucas' movies & TV shows. Not to mention -- of course -- the Golden Age of Hollywood) before it then makes sense to change the name of WDW's 3rd theme park one last time.
Of course, what's kind of ironic about all this is -- once Disney-MGM's name is finally changed to "Disney's Hollywood" -- this theme park will then actually fit the description found on that dedication plaque that Michael Eisner read back on May 1, 1989. Which reads:
“ The World you have entered was created by The Walt Disney Company and is dedicated to Hollywood—not a place on a map, but a state of mind that exists wherever people dream and wonder and imagine, a place where illusion and reality are fused by technological magic. We welcome you to a Hollywood that never was—and always will be. ” Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved
“ The World you have entered was created by The Walt Disney Company and is dedicated to Hollywood—not a place on a map, but a state of mind that exists wherever people dream and wonder and imagine, a place where illusion and reality are fused by technological magic. We welcome you to a Hollywood that never was—and always will be. ”
Speaking of MGM's origins ... I hope you enjoy some of the Disney-MGM construction shots that I've used to illustrate today's article. Which come by way of Jeff Lange's amazing Disney theme park photo archives.
Anywho ... What do you folks think? Will "Disney's Hollywood" really better represent what this theme park will be like in the future? Or should the Mouse just stick with that "Disney's Hollywood Studios" moniker?
Your thoughts?
I assume they didn't do a whole ride around Wizard of Oz because they only had a temporary licensing agreement with MGM. I would expect that they will change several of the MGM scenes from the Great Movie Ride (Wizard, Aliens, Casablanca). If I recall correctly, the Gangster, Cowboy and Indy-type scenes are more "generic" scenes that represent a genre and not specific movies. I don't know about the Busby Berkeley scene in the beginning.
("Alien" franchise belongs to 20th Century Fox, and "Casablanca" is a Warner Bros. picture.)
Like most people I was extremely surprised to read on this site that the new Studios name would contain this whole new Hollywood tag. Even though it’s not exactly the worst thing to happen to the Studios I can’t say I was happy with this news, and I don’t think the possibility of dropping the “Studios” from the official title in future makes things any better.
Firstly I just don’t like the whole “Hollywood” link being in the actual title. I love the vintage Hollywood angle contained within the park from the Chinese Theatre down to the Boulevards themselves but whilst I can’t quite put my finger on why I feel this way at the moment – I just don’t like the sound of Disney’s Hollywood / Studios.
Also, as Jim quite rightly points out, over the years the ability to label itself as an actual Studio has been on the decrease & subsequently there’s a chance that this tag will eventually be dropped. Whilst this is probably the “right” thing to do seeing as the park will only include stand-alone attractions as opposed to genuine movie-making of any sort I still prefer the sound of it being a “Studios”.
Universal doesn’t seem to worry too much about not having any genuine studio-related stuff in their Florida park but that also throws up another curve-ball. Whilst us Theme-Park buffs will always know which park we went Back to the Future in or where we watched the muppet film but many casual tourists who I speak to frequently can’t remember which park was which when it comes to the two “Studios”. As people know how much I enjoy visiting the parks they often discuss their experiences but over the years it's become apparent that they often get MGM & Universal mixed up. I just wonder if Disney & Universal are aware of this kind of confusion & if so would the next few years be a good time for Disney to address it ?
I certainly don’t have the answer to this or even a name that I’d be happy with & I may come around to the new name but I'm certain that the highly paid folks who dream up names for the parks
"("Alien" franchise belongs to 20th Century Fox, and "Casablanca" is a Warner Bros. picture.)"
I guess I should have done my homework before posting here. I just assumed that they were MGM properties, being that this was Disney MGM Studios (you know what they say about when you assume...).
So this begs the question, what did the MGM partnership bring to the deal? Obviously Wizard of Oz was a key asset (which was woefully underutilized). But if the other films in GMR were from other studios, what was the point of the partnership? It's not like there's a lot of MGM presence in this park. Star Wars is Fox and Indy is Paramount. I was always surprised that Disney never took advantage of the James Bond franchise that MGM has had forever. Modern MGM doesn't crank out a whole lot of hit films, but Bond is a major character/franchise. I'm guessing that it was a royalty issue, or it goes back to the whole temporary nature of the MGM agreement. Maybe Jim can fill us in. Do you read these boards Jim?
Yeah, I know there's a scene from "Oz" in the Great Movie Ride. But it sucked IMO. BTW, The Great Movie Ride, next to the decrepit Star Tours, is the ride most in need of either a HUGE refurbishment or to get ripped out of the park altogether IMO. They are both sooooo HOKEY!
Star Tours is classic IMO.
An if it is refurbished, I hope it's not a *flippin* pod-race.
The way Jim Hill hears it, "Star Tours 2.0" could be just the start. Hill shares what he's heard about a possible "Lucas Land" area going into Disney's Hollywood Studios as well as Mickey's efforts to land the broadcast rights to George's new "Star Wars"
Disney's Hollywood sounds too incomplete. Now lazy people will just call it "Hollywood".
i have a Disney Mickey Mouse old reel film and it also has the name on it Hollywood Enterprises Inc. How can i find out what it is worth and willing to sell. Thank you for your time