Film & Movies
Brendan Fraser in “George of the Jungle 2” ?! Fat chance !!
Jim Hill’s talking about today’s “George of the Jungle 2” release … about the gag that you almost got to see in this Disney sequel. How — if the film’s producers had had their way — Brendan would have been back for one super-sized cameo.

There’s this great little moment about five minutes in to “George of the Jungle 2.” It’s when the audience finally gets its first good up-close look at the guy playing George … and they suddenly realizes that it’s not Brendan Fraser, the actor who played the clumsy jungle king in the original 1997 film. But rather, Christopher Showerman, a Brendan Fraser look-alike.
Even the film’s off-screen narrator seems somewhat taken aback by this development. So he asks Showerman what happened to the actor who originally played this part. Christopher turns to the camera and — while still in character — matter-of-factly says “Studio too cheap to pay Brendan Fraser.”
That’s a great line, don’t you think? Mind you, it isn’t true. But it’s a great line nonetheless.
Brendan Fraser for “George of the Jungle 2”
Truth be told, the producers of the original “George of the Jungle” film — Jon Avnet and Jordan Kerner — were desperate to get Brendan to put on that loincloth one more time. Given how much money these Walt Disney Pictures release had made during the summer of 1997 (not to mention the additional millions that “George” made when the film made its home video debut that December), Jon and Jordan knew that a sequel to this movie would be a sure-fire money-maker.
The only problem was that Avnet and Kerner (who are normally pretty sharp operators) had neglected to include a sequel clause in their original contract with Fraser. So — having completed work on the first film — Brendan was now under no obligation to do a second “George of the Jungle” picture for Disney.
With the hope that more money might be enough to convince Fraser to return to the treetops, David and Jordan reportedly offered (back in October 2000) Brendan $12.5 million to appear in “George of the Jungle 2.” Avnet and Kerner supposedly said they’d even give the actor script approval if he’d agree to “Watch out for that tree!” just one more time.

Brendan Fraser’s Reservations About Returning
But Fraser had been pretty badly beaten up during the making of the first “George of the Jungle.” The film’s numerous slapstick action sequences had left Brendan covered with bruises (which the movie’s make-up artists then had to touch and hide every time Fraser had to go back in front of the camera). And then — when you add in the fact that it took Brendan six months of strict dieting and weight training to get in shape for that role — maybe you can understand why Fraser wasn’t all that eager to go back to the jungle. In spite of the large pile of dough that the film’s producers had placed before him.
Still, Brendan did have some affection for the “George of the Jungle” character. (Fraser, as it turns out, is a huge animation fan. Which is why he agreed to appear in films like “George,” “Dudley Do-Right,” “Moneybone” as well as Warner’s upcoming holiday release, “Looney Tunes: Back in Action.”) And — given that appearing in this Disney film had helped revive his career — he felt that he owed the producers something.
Brendan’s Cameo in “George of the Jungle 2”
So Brendan made a counter-proposal to Jon and Jordan. He’d agreed to appear in “George of the Jungle 2.” But only for a very short but extremely funny cameo. Which would explain why Avnet and Kerner were forced to let the actor go and get someone else to star in their “George of the Jungle” sequel.
What was Fraser’s idea? He’d get the very same make-up artists who kept covering up all the bruises he got while making the first “George of the Jungle” movie to build him a fat suit. A REALLY fat suit. Something that would make it look as if the actor had suddenly put on 300 – 400 pounds.
The idea was: “George of the Jungle 2” would start off with footage that had supposedly been taken of Brendan on his first day of work on the sequel. Clearly, the performer had let himself go between pictures. And it would immediately become obvious that Fraser’s enormous weight gain was going to have an impact on the film. For every time the overweight actor would try and swing on a vine, he would rip it out of a tree. And every time Brendan would try and walk around the tree house, the tree would lean dangerously to one side.
Of course, this being a live action movie that was based on a Jay Ward cartoon, the film’s producers would come up with a typically cartoonish way to solve their problem. They’d just lure off Fraser off of the “George of the Jungle 2” set (supposedly by leaving a trail of doughnuts, which would lead Brendan out of the soundstage and — eventually — off the Disney lot), and then bring in a brand-new, extremely-fit-looking actor to play the title role in the picture.
And — with that one gag-filled opening sequence completed — Fraser would be off the picture. Leaving that new actor to do all of that slamming-into-trees stuff on “George of the Jungle 2.”
That’s a pretty nifty idea of an opening for a “George of the Jungle” sequel, don’t you think? Avnet and Kerner certainly thought so. Unfortunately — when they ran Brendan’s concept by the folks at Disney — the Mouse House’s politically correct managers quickly nixed the idea.
Problems with Brendan Fraser’s Cameo
Why for? Well, the folks at Disney were worried that — if the entire opening scene of “George of the Jungle 2” keyed off on the comic concept that a grossly overweight Brendan Fraser was no longer fit to play the title role in their film — obese Americans might take offense. Which could result in negative publicity for the picture.
Now I know that might sound somewhat outlandish. A ridiculous over-reaction on the Disney Company’s part. But — truth be told — something quite similar to this happened back in November of 2001, when the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance (NAAFA) raised a ruckus over the release of “Shallow Hal,” a Farrelly Brothers comedy that featured Gwyneth Paltrow masquerading as a 300-pound fat woman. (You can read a copy of the press release that NAAFA sent out to the media in response to this 20th Century Fox film.)
But — beyond being sensitive to fat people — Disney Studios officials felt that it would be just a tease for movie-goers to only have Brendan Fraser appear in the first five minutes of “George of the Jungle 2.” Which is why the Mouse leaned on Avnet and Kerner, to see if they could persuade Fraser to at least make a few more appearances in the movie.
New Idea for Brendan’s Cameo
So Jon and Jordan then met with a few screenwriters, trying to come up with a logical way that Fraser’s role in the “George of the Jungle” sequel. One of the gag writers who was hired to work on the picture came up with a particularly inspired solution:
“Luring Brendan off the studio lot with a trail of doughnuts is a really great idea. But what if we were to build on that gag? What if the fat Fraser is so ashamed that he got fired off the picture that he vows to get himself back in shape.”
“So — every so often in ‘George of the Jungle 2’ — we cut back to Brendan. He’s jogging, riding exercise bicycles, going to aerobic classes. Do everything he can to get back in shape. And — each time we see him — Fraser is getting slimmer and slimmer.”
“Finally — at the very end of the sequel — Brendan comes running back on screen. He’s finally fit and ready to begin shooting ‘George of the Jungle 2.’ But Disney’s literally just wrapped production on the picture. By that I mean, Fraser can look down and actually see the words ‘The End’ hanging in mid-air in front of him.”
“When Fraser hears this, he gets so depressed that he rushes over to over to the craft services and begins powering down doughnuts. As the credits roll, we see the director of ‘George of the Jungle 2’ desperately trying to talk Brendan out of eating himself into a coma. Saying stuff like ‘If you keep the weight off, we’ll let you be in ‘George of the Jungle 3.'”
Again, a funny idea. Or so Avnet and Kerner thought. But when they sent the revised screenplay to Brendan, he rejected it out of hand.
Why Brendan Fraser Turned Down the Cameo in “George of the Jungle 2”
Why for? Because Fraser was looking to do just a couple of days work on “George of the Jungle 2.” But the new sequel script that Jon and Jordan sent him in April 2001 suggested that Fraser was going to have to work on this film for at least two or three weeks. Which wasn’t what Brendan had in mind at all.
Which is why Brendan began telling reporters — as he was doing publicity for “the Mummy Returns” — that someone else could take on the title role in the “George of the Jungle” sequel. That he — as an actor — has moved on.
Finally realizing that the ship had sailed on Brendan Fraser being in “George of the Jungle 2” (but still being aware that the Walt Disney Company wanted to make a sequel to the film that had earned $105.3 million during its domestic release), Avnet and Kerner regrouped. Without Brendan on board, the Mouse wasn’t going to give these producers as much money to make their movie. Which is why the “George of the Jungle” sequel went from being a theatrical release to a video premiere.
Filming “George of the Jungle 2”
Cuts were then made across the board on this particular production. Where the first “George” film had featured sequences that had been filmed on location in Hawaii, the sequel would be shot in Queensland, Australia. (The production facilities on Australia’s Gold Coast have become a favorite with Hollywood’s pencil pushers. Given the favorable exchange rate as well as the Aussie’s gift for stretching a film-maker’s budget.)
And — since Brendan Fraser and Leslie Mann (the actress who had originally played George’s love interest, Ursula Stanhope) had both opted out of appearing in the sequel — Avnet and Kerner had to find two new leads for their film. After an exhaustive search, they hired Julie Benz — best known for her work on the WB’s “Angel” — to play Ursula. And to play George, Jon and Jordan picked Brendan Fraser-lookalike Christopher Showerman.
“And who’s Christopher Showerman?” you ask. Well — up until he got hired to appear in “George of the Jungle 2” — Christopher’s biggest role to date has been as a contestant on NBC’s reality series, “Fear Factor.”

With Leslie Holland Taylor reprising her role as Beatrice Stanhope, Ursula’s meddling mother; “Wings” sitcom star Thomas Haden Church once again playing the villianous Lyle Vandergroot; and Monty Python vet John Cleese on board to do more vocals for George’s faithful gorilla companion, Ape, production of “George of the Jungle 2” officially got under way in Australia in August.
In kind of an ironic twist, when the “George of the Jungle 2” production team returned to the states to do some on-location scenes, they ended up shooting in Las Vegas during the exact same week that Brendan Fraser was in town filming an elaborate action sequence for “Looney Tunes: Back in Action.” Which is when the new George decided that he was going to try and get ahold of the old George.
Which is why — one night — Christopher Showerman ended up dropping by the hotel where Brendan Fraser was staying. Christopher dropped a note at the front desk for Brendan, thanking him for turning down “George of the Jungle 2.” Which resulted in Showerman getting his big break.
Brendan and Christopher – Two “Georges'”
Five months later, Brendan bumped into Christopher at a charity event in Hollywood. He apologized for not getting in touch with the fledging actor. But — in his note — Showerman had neglected to tell Fraser which hotel on the Las Vegas strip he was staying in. As a result, Brendan had no idea how to get ahold of the guy.
The two actors then compared notes on doing “George of the Jungle” movies. With Fraser telling Showerman about his cameo idea and Christopher warning Brendan that Avnet and Kerner are already talking about “George of the Jungle 3.”
“George of the Jungle 3”?
So who knows? In a couple of years, maybe we’ll see a sequel to “George of the Jungle 2.” Which (given Disney’s love of recycling) may feature that gags that Brendan Fraser originally cooked up for the follow-up to his Summer 1997 hit. Only — this time around — maybe it’ll be Showerman who’ll be pulling on the fat suit.
But — for now — I’m just pleased that the people who made “George of the Jungle 2” made sort of acknowledgment that Brendan Fraser wasn’t in the film. But as for that “Studio too cheap to pay Brendan Fraser” joke … well, it’s a great line. But — in this case — the truth is so much more entertaining than the fiction.
Your thoughts?
Film & Movies
Before He Was 626: The Surprisingly Dark Origins of Disney’s Stitch

Hopes are high for Disney’s live-action version of Lilo & Stitch, which opens in theaters next week (on May 23rd to be exact). And – if current box office projections hold – it will sell more than $120 million worth of tickets in North America.
Stitch Before the Live-Action: What Fans Need to Know
But here’s the thing – there wouldn’t have been a hand-drawn version of Stitch to reimagine as a live-action film if it weren’t for Academy Award-winner Chris Sanders. Who – some 40 years ago – had a very different idea in mind for this project. Not an animated film or a live-action movie, for that matter. But – rather – a children’s picture book.
Sanders revealed the true origins of Lilo & Stitch in his self-published book, From Pitch to Stitch: The Origins of Disney’s Most Unusual Classic.

From Picture Book to Pitch Meeting
Chris – after he graduated from CalArts back in 1984 (this was three years before he began working for Disney) – landed a job at Marvel Comics. Which – because Marvel Animation was producing the Muppet Babies TV show – led to an opportunity to design characters for that animated series.
About a year into this gig (we’re now talking 1985), Sanders – in his time away from work – began noodling on a side project. As Chris recalled in From Pitch to Stitch:
“Early in my animation career, I tried writing a picture book that centered around a weird little creature that lived a solitary life in the forest. He was a monster, unsure of where he had come from, or where he belonged. I generated a concept drawing, wrote some pages and started making a sculpted version of him. But I soon abandoned it as the idea seemed too large and vague to fit in thirty pages or so.”
We now jump ahead 12 years or so. Sanders has quickly moved up through the ranks at Walt Disney Animation Studios. So much so that – by 1997 – Chris is now the Head of Story on Disney’s Mulan.


A Monster in the Forest Becomes Stitch on Earth
With Mulan deep in production, Sanders was looking for his next project when an opportunity came his way.
“I had dinner with Tom Schumacher, who was president of Feature Animation at the time. He asked if there was anything I might be interested in directing. After a little reflection, I realized that there was something: That old idea from a decade prior.”
When Sanders told Schumacher about the monster who lived alone in the forest…
“Tom offered the crucial observation that – because the animal world is already alien to us – I should consider relocating the creature to the human world.”
With that in mind, Chris dusted off the story and went to work.
Over the next three months, Sanders created a pitch book for the proposed animated film. What he came up with was very different from the version of Lilo & Stitch that eventually hit theaters in 2002.
The Most Dangerous Creature in the Known Universe
The pitch – first shared with Walt Disney Feature Animation staffers on January 9, 1998 – was titled: Lilo & Stitch: A love story of a girl and what she thinks is a dog.
This early version of Stitch was… not cute. Not cuddly. He was mean, selfish, self-centered – a career criminal. When the story opens, Stitch is in a security pod at an intergalactic trial, found guilty of 12,000 counts of hooliganism and attempted planetary enslavement.
Instead of being created by Jumba, Stitch leads a gang of marauders. His second-in-command? Ramthar, a giant, red shark-like brute.
When Stitch refuses to reveal the gang’s location, he’s sentenced to life on a maximum-security asteroid. But en route, his gang attacks the prison convoy. In the chaos, Stitch escapes in a hijacked pod and crash-lands on Earth.


Earth in Danger, Jumba on the Hunt
Terrified of what Stitch could do to our technologically inferior planet, the Grand Council Woman sends bounty hunter Jumba – along with a rule-abiding Cultural Contamination Control agent named Pleakley – to retrieve (or eliminate) Stitch.
Their mission must be secret, follow Earth laws, and – most importantly – ensure no harm comes to any humans.
Naturally, Stitch ignores all that.
After his crash, Stitch claws out of the wreckage, sees the lights of a nearby town, and screams, “I will destroy you all!” That plan is immediately derailed when he’s run over by a convoy of sugar cane trucks.
Waking up in the local humane society, Stitch sees a news report confirming the Federation is already hot on his trail. He needs to blend in. Fast.
Enter Lilo
Lilo is a lonely little girl, mourning her parents, looking for a pet. Stitch plays the role of a “cute little doggie” because it’s a means to an end. At this point, Lilo is just someone to use while he builds a communications device.
Using parts from her toys and a stolen police radio, Stitch contacts his old gang. But Ramthar, now the leader, isn’t thrilled. Still, Stitch sends a signal.
Then he builds an army.
Stitch Goes Full Skynet
Stitch constructs a small robot, sends it to the junkyard to build bigger robots. Soon, he has an army. When Ramthar and crew arrive, Stitch’s robots surround them. Ramthar is furious, but Stitch regains command.
Next, Stitch sets his robotic horde on a nearby town. Everything goes smoothly until a robot targets the hula studio where Lilo is dancing. As it lifts her in its claw, Stitch has a change of heart. He saves her.
From here, the plot begins to resemble the Lilo & Stitch we know today. Sort of.
The Ending That Never Was
In Sanders’ original version, it’s not Captain Gantu who kidnaps Lilo, but Ramthar. And when the Grand Council Woman comes to collect Stitch, Lilo produces a receipt from the humane society.
“I paid a $4 processing fee to adopt him. If you take Stitch, you’re stealing.”
The Grand Council Woman crumples the receipt and says, “I didn’t see it.”
Nani chimes in: “Well, I saw it.”
Then Jumba. Then one of Stitch’s old crew. Then a hula girl. And finally, Pleakley pulls out his CCC badge and says:
“Well, I am Pleakley Grathor, Cultural Contamination Control Agent No. 444. And I saw it.”
Pleakley saves Stitch.


How Roy E. Disney Made Stitch Cuddly
Ultimately, this version of Lilo & Stitch was streamlined. Roy E. Disney believed Stitch shouldn’t be nasty. Just naughty. And not by choice – he was designed that way.
Which is how Stitch became Experiment 626. A misunderstood creation of Jumba the mad scientist, not a hardened criminal with a vendetta.
The rest, as they say, is history.

Ricardo Montalbán’s Lost Role
Here’s a detail that even hardcore Lilo & Stitch fans may not know: Ricardo Montalbán—best known as Mr. Roarke from Fantasy Island and Khan Noonien Singh from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan—was originally cast as the voice of Ramthar, Stitch’s second-in-command in this early version of the film. He had already recorded a significant amount of dialogue before the story was reworked following Roy E. Disney’s guidance. When Stitch evolved from a ruthless galactic outlaw to a misunderstood genetic experiment, Montalbán’s character (and much of the original gang concept) was written out entirely.
Which is kind of wild when you think about it. Wrath of Khan is widely considered the gold standard of Star Trek films. So yes, for a time, Khan himself was supposed to be part of Disney’s weirdest sci-fi comedy.
Stitch’s Legacy (and Why It Still Resonates)
Looking back at Stitch’s original story, it’s wild to think how close we came to getting a very different kind of movie. One where our favorite blue alien was less “ohana means family” and more “I’ll destroy you all.” But that transformation—from outlaw to outcast to ohana—is exactly what makes Lilo & Stitch so special.
So as the live-action version prepares to hit theaters, keep in mind that behind all the cuddly merch and tiki mugs lies one of Disney’s strangest, boldest, and most hard-won reinventions. One that started with a forest monster and became a beloved franchise about found family.
June 26th is officially Stitch Day—so mark your calendar. It’s a good excuse to celebrate just how far this little blue alien has come.
Film & Movies
How “An American Tail” Led to Disney’s “Hocus Pocus”

Over the last week, I’ve been delving into Witches Run Amok, Shannon Carlin’s oral history of the making of Disney’s Hocus Pocus. This book reveals some fascinating behind-the-scenes stories about the 1993 film that initially bombed at the box office but has since become a cult favorite, even spawning a sequel in 2022 that went on to become the most-watched release in Disney+ history.
But what really caught my eye in this 284-page hardcover wasn’t just the tales of Hocus Pocus’s unlikely rise to fame. Rather, it was the unexpected connections between Hocus Pocus and another beloved film—An American Tail. As it turns out, the two films share a curious origin story, one that begins in the mid-1980s, during the early days of the creative rebirth of Walt Disney Studios under Michael Eisner, Frank Wells, and Jeffrey Katzenberg.
The Birth of An American Tail
Let’s rewind to late 1984/early 1985, a period when Eisner, Wells, and Katzenberg were just getting settled at Disney and were on the hunt for fresh projects that would signal a new era at the studio. During this time, Katzenberg—tasked with revitalizing Disney Feature Animation—began meeting with talent across Hollywood, hoping to find a project that could breathe life into the struggling division.
One such meeting was with a 29-year-old writer and illustrator named David Kirschner. At the time, Kirschner’s biggest credit was illustrating children’s books featuring Muppets and Sesame Street characters, but he had an idea for a new project: a TV special about a mouse emigrating to America, culminating in the mouse’s arrival in New York Harbor on the same day as the dedication of the Statue of Liberty in 1886.

Katzenberg saw the patriotic appeal of the concept but ultimately passed on it, as he was focused on finding full-length feature projects for Disney’s animation department. Kirschner, undeterred, took his pitch elsewhere—to none other than Kathleen Kennedy, Steven Spielberg’s production partner. Kennedy was intrigued and invited Kirschner to Spielberg’s annual Fourth of July party to pitch the idea directly to the famed director.
Spielberg immediately saw the potential in Kirschner’s idea, but instead of a TV special, he envisioned a full-length animated feature film. This project would eventually become An American Tail, a tribute of sorts to Spielberg’s own grandfather, Philip Posner, who emigrated from Russia to the United States in the late 19th century. The film’s lead character, Fievel, was even named after Spielberg’s grandfather, whose Yiddish name was also Fievel.
Disney’s Loss Becomes Universal’s Gain
An American Tail went on to become a major success for Universal Pictures, which hadn’t been involved in an animated feature since the release of Pinocchio in Outer Space in 1965. Meanwhile, over at Disney, Eisner and Wells weren’t exactly thrilled that Katzenberg had let such a promising project slip through his fingers.
Not wanting to miss out on any future opportunities with Kirschner, Katzenberg quickly scheduled another meeting with him to discuss any other ideas he might have. And as fate would have it, Kirschner had just written a short story for Muppet Magazine called Halloween House, about a boy who is magically transformed into a cat by a trio of witches.
The Pitch That Sealed the Deal
Knowing Katzenberg could be a tough sell, Kirschner went all out to impress during his pitch. He requested access to the Disney lot 30 minutes early to set the stage for his presentation. When Katzenberg and the Disney development team walked into the conference room, they were greeted by a table covered in candy corn, a cauldron of dry ice fog, and a broom, mop, and vacuum cleaner suspended from the ceiling as if they were flying—evoking the magical world of Halloween House.
Katzenberg was reportedly unimpressed by the theatrical setup, muttering, “Oy, show-and-tell time” as he took his seat. But Kirschner knew exactly how to grab his attention. He started his pitch with the fact that Halloween was a billion-dollar business—a figure that made Katzenberg sit up and take notice. He listened attentively to Kirschner’s pitch, and by the time the meeting was over, Katzenberg was convinced. Halloween House would become Hocus Pocus, and Disney had its next big Halloween film.
A Bit of Hollywood Drama
Interestingly, Kirschner’s success with Hocus Pocus didn’t sit well with his old collaborators. About a year after the film’s release, Kirschner ran into Kathleen Kennedy at an Amblin holiday party, and she wasted no time in expressing her disappointment. According to Kirschner, Kennedy said, “You really hurt Steven.” When Kirschner asked how, she explained that Spielberg and Kennedy had given him his big break with An American Tail, but when he came up with the idea for his next film, he brought it to Disney rather than to them.
Hollywood can be a place where loyalty is valued—or, at least, perceived loyalty. At the same time, this was happening just as Katzenberg was leaving Disney and partnering with Spielberg and David Geffen to launch DreamWorks SKG, which only added to the tension. Loyalty, as Kirschner found out, can be an abstract concept in the entertainment industry.
A Halloween Favorite is Born
Despite its rocky start at the box office in 1993, Hocus Pocus has gone on to become a beloved part of Halloween pop culture. And, as Carlin’s book details, its success helped pave the way for more Disney Halloween-themed projects in the years that followed.

As for why Hocus Pocus was released in July of 1993 instead of during Halloween? That’s a story for another time, but it has something to do with another Halloween-themed project Disney was working on that year—Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas—and Katzenberg finding himself in the awkward position of having to choose between keeping Bette Midler or Tim Burton happy.
For more behind-the-scenes stories about Hocus Pocus and other Disney films, be sure to check out Witches Run Amok by Shannon Carlin. It’s a fascinating read for any Disney fan!
And if you love hearing these kinds of behind-the-scenes stories about animation and film history, be sure to check out Fine Tooning with Drew Taylor, where Drew and I dive deep into all things movies, animation, and the creative decisions that shape the films we love. You can find us on your favorite podcast platforms or right here on JimHillMedia.com.
Film & Movies
How Disney’s “Bambi” led to the creation of Smokey Bear

When people talk about Disney’s “Bambi,” the scene that they typically cite as being the one from this 1942 film which then scarred them for life is – of course – the moment in this movie where Bambi’s mother gets shot by hunters.
Which is kind of ironic. Given that – if you watch this animated feature today – you’ll see that a lot of this ruined-my-childhood scene actually happens off-camera. I mean, you hear the rifle shot that takes down Bambi’s Mom. But you don’t actually see that Mama Deer get clipped.
Now for the scariest part of that movie that you actually see on-camera … Hands down, that has to be the forest fire sequence in “Bambi.” As the grown-up Bambi & his bride, Faline, desperately race through those woods, trying to find a path to safety as literally everything around them is ablaze … That sequence is literally nightmare fuel.

Mind you, the artists at Walt Disney Animation Studios had lots of inspiration for the forest fire sequence in “Bambi.” You see, in a typical year, the United States experiences – due to either natural phenomenon like lightning strikes or human carelessness – 100 forest fires. Whereas in 1940 (i.e., the year that Disney Studios began working in earnest of a movie version of Felix Salten’s best-selling movie), America found itself battling a record 360 forest fires.
Which greatly concerned the U.S. Forest Service. But not for the reason you might think.
Protecting the Forest for World War II
I mean, yes. Sure. Officials over in the Agricultural Department (That’s the arm of the U.S. government that manages the Forest Service) were obviously concerned about the impact that this record number of forest fires in 1940 had had on citizens. Not to mention all of the wildlife habitat that was now lost.
But to be honest, what really concerned government officials was those hundreds of thousands of acres of raw timber that had been consumed by these blazes. You see, by 1940, the world was on the cusp of the next world war. A conflict that the U.S. would inevitably be pulled into. And all that now-lost timber? It could have been used to fuel the U.S. war machine.
So with this in mind (and U.S. government officials now seeing an urgent need to preserve & protect this precious resource) … Which is why – in 1942 (just a few months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor) – the U.S. Forest Service rolls out its first-ever forest fire prevention program.
Which – given that this was the early days of World War II – the slogan that the U.S. Forest Service initially chose for its forest fire prevention program is very in that era’s we’re-all-in-this-together / so-let’s-do-what-we-can-to-help-America’s war-effort esthetic – made a direct appeal to all those folks who were taking part in scrap metal drives: “Forest Defense is National Defense.”

And the poster that the U.S. Forest Service had created to support this campaign? … Well, it was well-meaning as well. It was done in the WPA style and showed men out in the forest, wielding shovels to ditch a ditch. They were trying to construct a fire break, which would then supposedly slow the forest fire that was directly behind them.
But the downside was … That “Forest Defense is National Defense” slogan – along with that poster which the U.S. Forest Service had created to support their new forest fire prevention program didn’t exactly capture America’s attention.
I mean, it was the War Years after all. A lot was going in the country at that time. But long story short: the U.S. Forest Service’s first attempt at launching a successful forest fire prevention program sank without a trace.
So what do you do in a situation like this? You regroup. You try something different.
Disney & Bambi to the Rescue
And within the U.S. government, the thinking now was “Well, what if we got a celebrity to serve as the spokesman for our new forest fire prevention program? Maybe that would then grab the public’s attention.”
The only problem was … Well, again, these are the War Years. And a lot of that era’s A-listers (people like Jimmy Stewart, Clark Gable, even Mel Brooks) had already enlisted. So there weren’t really a lot of big-name celebrities to choose from.
But then some enterprising official at the U.S. Forest Service came up with an interesting idea. He supposedly said “Hey, have you seen that new Disney movie? You know, the one with the deer? That movie has a forest fire in it. Maybe we should go talk with Walt Disney? Maybe he has some ideas about how we can better capture the public’s attention when it comes to our new forest fire prevention program?”
And it turns Walt did have an idea. Which was to use this government initiative as a way to cross-promote Disney Studio’s latest full-length animated feature, “Bambi.” Which been first released to theaters in August of 1942.
So Walt had artists at Disney Studio work up a poster that featured the grown-up versions of Bambi the Deer, Thumper the Rabbit & Flower the Skunk. As this trio stood in some tall grasses, they looked imploring out at whoever was standing in front of this poster. Above them was a piece of text that read “Please Mister, Don’t Be Careless.” And below these three cartoon characters was an additional line that read “Prevent Forest Fires. Greater Danger Than Ever!”

According to folks I’ve spoken with at Disney’s Corporate Archives, this “Bambi” -based promotional campaign for the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention campaign was a huge success. So much so that – as 1943 drew to a close – this division of the Department of Agriculture reportedly reached out to Walt to see if he’d be willing to let the U.S. Forest Service continue to use these cartoon characters to help raise the public’s awareness of fire safety.
Walt – for reasons known only to Mr. Disney – declined. Some have suggested that — because “Bambi” had actually lost money during its initial theatrical release in North America – that Walt was now looking to put that project behind him. And if there were posters plastered all over the place that then used the “Bambi” characters that then promoted the U.S.’s forest fire prevention efforts … Well, it would then be far harder for Mr. Disney to put this particular animated feature in the rear view mirror.
Introducing Smokey Bear
Long story short: Walt said “No” when it came to reusing the “Bambi” characters to promote the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention program. But given how successful the previous cartoon-based promotional campaign had been … Well, some enterprising employee at the Department of Agriculture reportedly said “Why don’t we come up with a cartoon character of our own?”
So – for the Summer of 1944 – the U.S. Forest Service (with the help of the Ad Council and the National Association of State Foresters) came up with a character to help promote the prevention of forest fires. And his name is Smokey Bear.
Now a lot of thought had gone into Smokey’s creation. Right from the get-go, it was decided that he would be an American black bear (NOT a brown bear or a grizzly). To make this character seem approachable, Smokey was outfitted with a ranger’s hat. He also wore a pair of blue jeans & carried a bucket.
As for his debut poster, Smokey was depicted as pouring water over a still-smoldering campfire. And below this cartoon character was printed Smokey’s initial catchphrase. Which was “Care will prevent 9 out of 10 forest fires!”

Which makes me think that this slogan was written by the very advertising executive who wrote “Four out of five dentists recommend sugarless gum for their patients who chew gum.”
Anyway … By the Summer of 1947, Smokey got a brand-new slogan. The one that he uses even today. Which is “Only YOU can prevent forest fires.”
The Real Smokey Bear
Now where this gets interesting is – in the Summer of 1950 – there was a terrible forest fire up in the Capitan Mountains of New Mexico. And over the course of this blaze, a bear cub climbed high up into a tree to try & escape those flames.
Firefighters were finally able to rescue that cub. But he was so badly injured in that fire that he was shipped off to the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. and nursed back to health. And since this bear really couldn’t be released back in the wild at this point, he was then put on exhibit.
And what does this bear’s keepers decide to call him? You guessed it: Smokey.

And due to all the news coverage that this orphaned bear got, he eventually became the living symbol of the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention program. Which then meant that this particular Smokey Bear got hit with a ton of fan mail. So much so that the National Zoo in Washington D.C. wound up with its own Zip Code.
“Smokey the Bear” Hit Song
And on the heels of a really-for-real Smokey Bear taking up residence in our nation’s capital, Steve Nelson & Jack Rollins decide to write a song that shined a spotlight on this fire-fightin’ bruin. Here’s the opening stanza:
With a ranger’s hat and shovel and a pair of dungarees,
You will find him in the forest always sniffin’ at the breeze,
People stop and pay attention when he tells them to beware
Because everybody knows that he’s the fire-preventin’ bear
Believe or not, even with lyrics like these, “Smokey the Bear” briefly topped the Country charts in the Summer of 1950. Thanks to a version of this song that was recorded by Gene Autry, the Singing Cowboy.
By the way, it was this song that started all of the confusion in regards to Smokey Bear’s now. You see, Nelson & Rollins – because they need the lyrics of their song to scan properly – opted to call this fire-fightin’-bruin Smokey THE Bear. Rather than Smokey Bear. Which has been this cartoon character’s official name since the U.S. Forest Service first introduced him back in 1944.
“The Ballad of Smokey the Bear”
Further complicating this issue was “The Ballad of Smokey the Bear,” which was a stop-motion animated special that debuted on NBC in late November of 1966. Produced by Rankin-Bass as a follow-up to their hugely popular “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” (which premiered on the Peacock Network in December of 1964) … This hour-long TV show also put a “THE” in the middle of Smokey Bear’s name because the folks at Rankin-Bass thought his name sounded better that way.
And speaking of animation … Disney’s “Bambi” made a brief return to the promotional campaign for the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention program in the late 1980s. This was because the Company’s home entertainment division had decided to release this full-length animated feature on VHS.
What’s kind of interesting, though, is the language used on the “Bambi” poster is a wee different than the language that’s used on Smokey’s poster. It reads “Protect Our Forest Friends. Only You Can Prevent Wildfires.” NOT “Forest Fires.”
Anyway, that’s how Disney’s “Bambi” led to the creation of Smokey Bear. Thanks for bearin’ with me as I clawed my way through this grizzly tale.
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment8 months ago
Disney’s Forgotten Halloween Event: The Original Little Monsters on Main Street
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment9 months ago
The Story of Mickey’s Not-So-Scary Halloween Party: From One Night to a Halloween Family Tradition
-
Film & Movies8 months ago
How “An American Tail” Led to Disney’s “Hocus Pocus”
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment6 months ago
Disney and Macy’s 90-Year Thanksgiving Day Parade Partnership: From Mickey’s First Balloon to Minnie’s Big Debut
-
Television & Shows5 months ago
How the Creators of South Park Tricked A-List Celebrities to Roast Universal – “Your Studio & You”
-
History4 months ago
The Super Bowl & Disney: The Untold Story Behind ‘I’m Going to Disneyland!’
-
Podcast2 months ago
Epic Universal Podcast – Aztec Dancers, Mariachis, Tequila, and Ceremonial Sacrifices?! (Ep. 45)
-
Film & Movies2 weeks ago
Before He Was 626: The Surprisingly Dark Origins of Disney’s Stitch