General

Was “Home on the Range” deliberately under-promoted?

Jim Hill reports on an interesting story that’s currently making the rounds in animation circles. Evidently, Disney — in an effort to make sure that its last traditionally animated film didn’t accidentally upstage the company’s first CG feature — may have scaled back HOTR’s promotion.

Published

21 years ago

June 5, 2004

Jim Hill

Notice anything different about the way the Walt Disney Company has been promoting its latest animated feature, “Home on the Range? That the marketing campaign for this movie may seem somewhat half-hearted?

Well — if you did — then you’re not the only one. Over the last week or so, I have received a dozen or more e-mails from Disney insiders. Each of them furious with the way the studio has been handling the promotion of “Home on the Range.”

Fairly typical of these notes was the one I just received from E. Xecutive, a longtime senior employee at Disney Feature Animation:

“Did you see the promotional campaign that Disney put together for ‘Home on the Range’? ‘On April 2, Bust a Moo’?! Beyond those banners for the multiplexes and that trailer in front of ‘Brother Bear,’ what else did the company do to try and build up public awareness of this movie? I saw a couple of bus shelter signs around LA and a few TV commercials that aired less than 10 days before HOTR officially opened. But — beyond that — nothing.

If you asked me, management did this deliberately. They wanted it to appear as if this movie did poorly during its domestic release. That way — when ‘Chicken Little’ opens next July and does marginally better than ‘Home on the Range’ did at the box office — Eisner and his cronies can say ‘See? We did make the right choice in shutting down WDFA’s traditional animation unit and switching to CG.’

It’s so aggravating when a film that we all worked so hard on, a movie that everyone here is so anxious to see succeed, gets sacrificed to service someone else’s agenda.”

Can this be true? Is it really possible that Disney’s “Home on the Range” was deliberately under-promoted? With the hope that — when the box office performance of the studio’s last traditionally animated film is compared to its first all CG effort — “Chicken Little” will come out looking that much more impressive?

Certainly — when one takes a look at the big picture — there have been some troubling decisions made by Mouse House managers in regards to this motion picture. First and foremost being “Home on the Range”‘s release date.

Now — typically — when a movie studio is anxious to make sure that a film reaches the widest possible audience (with the hope that this movie will then be able to earn the largest amount possible at the box office) it typically releases that motion picture in one of two time slots: the period between Memorial Day and Labor Day OR the period between Thanksgiving and New Years Day.

Whereas April … Well, April isn’t really a super-hot time for a studio to release a movie during. Sure — what with April school vacation and all — it is admittedly a better month than most for a family film to make its debut in. (Why for? Because — when the kids are out of school — the parents are obviously looking for things to take their offspring to. And what better way is there to kill a few hours then to take your children to see Disney’s latest animated feature?) But — that said — April is still not a primo month to premiere your picture in.

And yet here is Disney rolling “Home on the Range” out into theaters on April 2nd. So what’s up with that?

Was this because “Home on the Range” was a dog? Hardly. From what I hear, “HOTR” had reportedly performed extremely well during all of its test screenings. Audiences seemed to really enjoy this animated comic western. So much so that it was suggested that — were Walt Disney Pictures to put together a fairly innovative promotional program for this soon-to-be-released feature (I.E. something similar to that clever teaser campaign that the Mouse’s marketing department mounted for Disney’s June 2002 release, “Lilo and Stitch”) — “Home on the Range” could easily turn into the company’s next animated blockbuster.

Yet Disney didn’t do that. They opted instead to go with a fairly low key campaign. No clever ads featuring Maggie the Cow (voiced by Roseanne Barr) interacting with classic Disney characters. Instead, we got Disney’s garden variety promotional campaign for “Home on the Range.” No extra effort. Your standard bells and whistles.

Which — to a lot of people working in Feature Animation — gives credence to the whole Disney’s-deliberately-sandbagging-“Home-on-the-Range”-in-order-to make-“Chicken-Little”-look-really-good theory.

Particularly troubling to many WDFA staffers was Disney’s decision not to press McDonalds into offering a “Home on the Range” themed Happy Meal during the film’s domestic release. Which — these days — is absolutely crucial if you want to get the word out among parents and kids alike that you have a brand new movie out in theaters that you’d like them to see.

Of course, to be fair, I should mention that — when I pointed this out to someone in Disney’s marketing department earlier this week — their response was:

Jim:

“Home on the Range” is a motion picture that stars heroic cows. Hamburger, as you know, is made up of ground beef. Which — of course — comes from cattle. Both male cattle (bull) and female cattle (cow).

McDonalds nixed our idea of doing “Home on the Range” Happy Meals because they were concerned that kids — as they were playing with their Maggie the Cow toy — might suddenly realize that beef comes from cows, and then refuse to eat their hamburgers.

Yes, it was a disappointment when they opted not to do HOTR Happy Meals. And — as for why we didn’t approach any other fast food chain to do a “Home on the Range” promotion — we have a long term, exclusive deal with McDonalds that prevents us from approaching any other restaurant chains.

When I forwarded this note to a friend who had actually worked on “Home on the Range,” I got this somewhat frustrated reply:

What’s maddening about this whole situation was that — as we were making HOTR — we were told time and time again by WDFA management that we couldn’t say that Maggie, Mrs. Caloway and Grace were going to end up being slaughtered. We could say that Alameda Slim was rustling cattle. We could say that he was selling 5000 cows to Mr. Wesley. But we could never say that any of the cattle depicted in the film were headed to the slaughter house.

Why? Because the people in Disney’s marketing department were desperate to get McDonalds’ help in promoting “Home on the Range.” Particularly to get toys that were based on the film’s characters placed in those Happy Meal boxes. So we did all that hard work — deliberately steering HOTR’s story away from the whole slaughter house angle — for nothing.

And what really makes me crazy about this whole situation is how inconsistent McDonalds has been. Do you know what their most successful promotion last year was? When their restaurants were selling those “Finding Nemo” Happy Meal toys. Of course, given that McDonalds doesn’t sell a kids meal that features its “Fillet O Fish” sandwich, I guess that company execs weren’t all that concerned about children finding Nemo served up with a slice of cheese on a Sesame seed bun.

And what about when they sold all of those “Toy Story” Happy Meals? Don’t they think that some kids — as they were snarfing their French Fries — got upset when they found a Mr. Potato Head toy at the bottom of their box.

It’s just so maddening … and disappointing. Having McDonalds on board would have really helped raise “Home on the Range”‘s profile. Made more people aware that our movie was out in theaters. Now … Well, I guess we’re going to have to wait for DVD and hope that more people rediscover the film then.

Of course, having “Home on the Range” released just seven days before Disney’s delayed “Alamo” movie didn’t help matters either. Given that this meant that the Mouse House’s marketing staff now had to divide its time, staff and resources between two major productions that were rolling into theaters within a week of one another …

But — again — there are a lot of people (who — admittedly — used to work in traditional animation at the Walt Disney Company) who think that the Mouse deliberately didn’t do everything it could to insure that “Home on the Range” was a success. The folks that I spoke with in Marketing disagree, of course. They point to Disneyland’s “Little Patch of Heaven” petting zone as well as the windows on Main Street U.S.A. They also point to the “Home on the Range” themed float that leads off the daily parade at WDW’s Mgic Kingdom. As well as the piles of HOTR merchandise currently on sale at your local Disney Store.

“Believe me, Jim,” said one unnamed Disney promotional official. “We did everything that we could with ‘Home on the Range.’ We all liked this movie. We believed in this film. That’s why we did everything to help get the word out about this movie. It’s sad that so few people have turned so far. But give the movie time. Maybe it’ll get its second wind later this month. Hey, it happened with ‘Groove.’ Maybe it will happen again here.”

Still other folks who work at WDFA aren’t quite as convinced. “They missed so many obvious opportunities to promote this picture, ” said E . Xcutive. “And Disney’s marketing staff has been publicizing our feature length cartoons for decades now. So those guys obviously know how to do their jobs. And yet they suddenly bobble the campaign for ‘Home on the Range’ … and we’re just supposed to think that that’s a co-incidence.”

“It’s clear to me that the upper levels of Disney management didn’t really want ‘Home on the Range’ to be all that big a success. Not a flop, either. Just a medium-sized success. Something that ‘Chicken Little’ would have no trouble topping,” E. Xcutive said in conclusion. “Again, I think it’s sad that this picture didn’t get the sort of promotion that it needed, the kind of marketing that it deserved … all because of someone’s agenda in the Team Disney building.”

It’s kind of interesting to get both sides on this issue, don’t you think?

General

Seward Johnson bronzes add a surreal, artistic touch to NYC’s Garment District

Published

10 years ago

June 23, 2015

Jim Hill

Greetings from NYC. Nancy and I drove down from New
Hampshire yesterday because we'll be checking out
Disney Consumer Products' annual Holiday Showcase later today.

Anyway … After checking into our hotel (i.e., The Paul.
Which is located down in NYC's NoMad district), we decided to grab some dinner.
Which is how we wound up at the Melt Shop.

Photo by Jim Hill

Which is this restaurant that only sells grilled cheese sandwiches.
This comfort food was delicious, but kind of on the heavy side.

Photo by Jim Hill

Which is why — given that it was a beautiful summer night
— we'd then try and walk off our meals. We started our stroll down by the Empire
State Building
…

Photo by Jim Hill

… and eventually wound up just below Times
Square (right behind where the Waterford Crystal Times Square New
Year's Eve Ball is kept).

Photo by Jim Hill

But you know what we discovered en route? Right in the heart
of Manhattan's Garment District
along Broadway between 36th and 41st? This incredibly cool series of life-like
and life-sized sculptures that Seward
Johnson has created.

Photo by Jim Hill

And — yes — that is Abraham Lincoln (who seems to have
slipped out of WDW's Hall of Presidents when no one was looking and is now
leading tourists around Times Square). These 18 painted
bronze pieces (which were just installed late this past Sunday night / early
Monday morning) range from the surreal to the all-too-real.

Photo by Jim Hill

Some of these pieces look like typical New Yorkers. Like the
business woman planning out her day …

Photo by Jim Hill

… the postman delivering the mail …

Photo by Jim Hill

… the hot dog vendor working at his cart …

Photo by Jim Hill

… the street musician playing for tourists …

Photo by Jim Hill

Not to mention the tourists themselves.

Photo by Jim Hill

But right alongside the bronze businessmen …

Photo by Jim Hill

… and the tired grandmother hauling her groceries home …

Photo by Jim Hill

… there were also statues representing people who were
from out-of-town …

Photo by Jim Hill

… or — for that matter — out-of-time.

Photo by Jim Hill

These were the Seward Johnson pieces that genuinely beguiled. Famous impressionist paintings brought to life in three dimensions.

Note the out-of-period water bottle that some tourist left
behind. Photo by Jim Hill

Some of them so lifelike that you actually had to pause for
a moment (especially as day gave way to night in the city) and say to yourself
"Is that one of the bronzes? Or just someone pretending to be one of these
bronzes?"

Mind you, for those of you who aren't big fans of the
impressionists …

Photo by Jim Hill

… there's also an array of American icons. Among them
Marilyn Monroe …

Photo by Jim Hill

… and that farmer couple from Grant Wood's "American
Gothic."

Photo by Jim Hill

But for those of you who know your NYC history, it's hard to
beat that piece which recreates Alfred Eisenstaedt's famous photograph of V-J Day in Times Square.

Photo by Jim Hill

By the way, a 25-foot-tall version of this particular Seward
Johnson piece ( which — FYI — is entitled "Embracing Peace") will actually
be placed in Times Square for a few days on or around August 14th to commemorate the 70th
anniversary of Victory Over Japan Day (V-J Day).

Photo by Jim Hill

By the way, if you'd like to check these Seward Johnson bronzes in
person (which — it should be noted — are part of the part of the Garment
District Alliance's new public art offering) — you'd best schedule a trip to
the City sometime over the next three months. For these pieces will only be on
display now through September 15th.

General

Wondering what you should “Boldly Go” see at the movies next year? The 2015 Licensing Expo offers you some clues

Published

10 years ago

June 10, 2015

Jim Hill

Greeting from the 2015 Licensing Expo, which is being held
at the Mandalay Bay
Convention Center in Las
Vegas.

Photo by Jim Hill

I have to admit that I enjoy covering the Licensing Expo.
Mostly becomes it allows bloggers & entertainment writers like myself to
get a peek over the horizon. Scope out some of the major motion pictures &
TV shows that today's vertically integrated entertainment conglomerates
(Remember when these companies used to be called movie studios?) will be
sending our way over the next two years or so.

Photo by Jim Hill

Take — for example — all of "The Secret Life of
Pets" banners that greeted Expo attendees as they made their way to the
show floor today. I actually got to see some footage from this new Illumination
Entertainment production (which will hit theaters on July 8, 2016) the last time I was in Vegas. Which
was for CinemaCon back in April. And the five or so minutes of film that I viewed
suggested that "The Secret Life of Pets" will be a really funny
animated feature.

Photo by Jim Hill

Mind you, Universal Pictures wanted to make sure that Expo
attendees remembered that there was another Illumination Entertainment production
coming-to-a-theater-near-them before "The Secret Life of Pets" (And
that's "Minions," the "Despicable Me" prequel. Which
premieres at the Annecy International Animated Film Festival next week but
won't be screened stateside 'til July 10th of this year). Which is why they had
three minions who were made entirely out of LEGOS loitering out in the lobby.

Photo by Jim Hill

And Warner Bros. — because they wanted "Batman v
Superman: Dawn of Justice" to start trending on Twitter today — brought
the Batmobile to Las Vegas.

Photo by Jim Hill

Not to mention full-sized macquettes of Batman, Superman and
Wonder Woman. Just so conventioneers could then see what these DC superheroes
would actually look like in this eagerly anticipated, March 25, 2016 release.

Photo by Jim Hill

That's the thing that can sometimes be a wee bit frustrating
about the Licensing Expo. It's all about delayed gratification. You'll come
around a corner and see this 100 foot-long ad for "The Peanuts Movie"
and think "Hey, that looks great. I want to see that Blue Sky Studios production
right now." It's only then that you notice the fine print and realize that
"The Peanuts Movie" doesn't actually open in theaters 'til November
6th of this year.

Photo by Jim Hill

And fan of Blue Sky's "Ice Age" film franchise are in for an even
longer wait. Given that the latest installment in that top grossing series
doesn't arrive in theaters 'til July
15, 2016.

Photo by Jim Hill

Of course, if you're one of those people who needs immediate
gratification when it comes to your entertainment, there was stuff like that to
be found at this year's Licensing Expo. Take — for example — how the WWE
booth was actually shaped like a wrestling ring. Which — I'm guessing — meant
that if the executives of World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. didn't like
the offer that you were making, they were then allowed to toss you out over the
top rope, Royal Rumble-style.

Photo by Jim Hill

I also have to admit that — as a longtime Star Trek fan —
it was cool to see the enormous Starship Enterprise that hung in place over the
CBS booth. Not to mention getting a glimpse of the official Star Trek 50th
Anniversary logo.

Photo by Jim Hill

I was also pleased to see lots of activity in The Jim Henson
Company booth. Which suggests that JHC has actually finally carved out a
post-Muppets identity for itself.

Photo by Jim Hill

Likewise for all of us who were getting a little concerned
about DreamWorks Animation (what with all the layoffs & write-downs &
projects that were put into turnaround or outright cancelled last year), it was
nice to see that booth bustling.

Photo by Jim Hill

Every so often, you'd come across some people who were
promoting a movie that you weren't entirely sure that you actually wanted to
see (EX: "Angry Birds," which Sony Pictures Entertainment / Columbia
Pictures will be releasing to theaters on May 20, 2016). But then you remembered that Clay Kaytis —
who's this hugely talented former Walt Disney Animation Studios animator — is
riding herd on "Angry Birds" with Fergal Reilly. And you'd think
"Well, if Clay's working on 'Angry Birds,' I'm sure this animated feature
will turn out fine."

Photo by Jim Hill

Mind you, there were reminders at this year's Licensing Expo
of great animated features that we're never going to get to see now. I still
can't believe — especially after that brilliant proof-of-concept footage
popped up online last year — that Sony execs decided not to go forward
with production of Genndy Tartakovsky's
"Popeye" movie. But that's the
cruel thing about the entertainment business, folks. It will sometime break
your heart.

Photo by Jim Hill

And make no mistake about this. The Licensing Expo is all
about business. That point was clearly driven home at this year's show when —
as you walked through the doors of the Mandalay
Bay Convention Center
— the first thing that you saw was the Hasbros Booth. Which was this gleaming,
sleek two story-tall affair full of people who were negotiating deals &
signing contracts for all of the would-be summer blockbusters that have already
announced release dates for 2019 & beyond.

Photo by Jim Hill

"But what about The Walt Disney Company?," you
ask. "Weren't they represented on the show floor at this year's Licensing
Expo?" Not really, not. I mean, sure. There were a few companies there hyping
Disney-related products. Take — for example — the Disney Wikkeez people.

Photo by Jim Hill

I'm assuming that some Disney Consumer Products exec is
hoping that Wikkeez will eventually become the new Tsum Tsum. But to be blunt,
these little hard plastic figures don't seem to have the same huggable charm
that those stackable plush do. But I've been wrong before. So let's see what
happens with Disney Wikkeez once they start showing up on the shelves of the
Company's North American retail partners.

Photo by Jim Hill

And speaking of Disney's retail partners … They were
meeting with Mouse House executives behind closed doors one floor down from the
official show floor for this year's Licensing Expo.

Photo by Jim Hill

And the theme for this year's invitation-only Disney shindig? "Timeless
Stories" involving the Disney, Pixar, Marvel & Lucasfilm brands that
would then appeal to "tomorrow's consumer."

Photo by Jim Hill

And just to sort of hammer home the idea that Disney is no
longer the Company which cornered the market when it comes to little girls
(i.e., its Disney Princess and Disney Fairies franchises), check out this
wall-sized Star Wars-related image that DCP put up just outside of one of its
many private meeting rooms. "See?," this carefully crafted photo
screams. "It isn't just little boys who want to wield the Force. Little
girls also want to grow up and be Lords of the Sith."

Photo by Jim Hill

One final, kind-of-ironic note: According to this banner,
Paramount Pictures will be releasing a movie called "Amusement Park"
to theaters sometime in 2017.

Photo by Jim Hill

Well, given all the "Blackfish" -related issues
that have been dogged SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment over the past two years, I'm
just hoping that they'll still be in the amusement park business come 2017.

Your thoughts?

General

It takes more than three circles to craft a Classic version of Mickey Mouse

Published

10 years ago

June 9, 2015

Jim Hill

You know what Mickey Mouse looks like, right? Little guy,
big ears?

Truth be told, Disney's corporate symbol has a lot of
different looks. If Mickey's interacting with Guests at Disneyland
Park (especially this summer, when
the Happiest Place on Earth
is celebrating its 60th anniversary), he looks & dresses like this.

Or when he's appearing in one of those Emmy Award-winning shorts that Disney
Television Animation has produced (EX: "Bronco Busted," which debuts
on the Disney Channel tonight at 8 p.m. ET / PT), Mickey is drawn in a such a
way that he looks hip, cool, edgy & retro all at the same time.

Looking ahead to 2017 now, when Disney Junior rolls out "Mickey and the
Roadster Racers," this brand-new animated series will feature a sportier version
of Disney's corporate symbol. One that Mouse House managers hope will persuade
preschool boys to more fully embrace this now 86 year-old character.

That's what most people don't realize about the Mouse. The
Walt Disney Company deliberately tailors Mickey's look, even his style of
movement, depending on what sort of project / production he's appearing in.

Take — for example — Disney
California Adventure
Park's "World of Color:
Celebrate!" Because Disney's main mouse would be co-hosting this new
nighttime lagoon show with ace emcee Neil Patrick Harris, Eric Goldberg really had
to step up Mickey's game. Which is why this master Disney animator created
several minutes of all-new Mouse animation which then showed that Mickey was
just as skilled a showman as Neil was.

Better yet, let's take a look at what the folks at Avalanche Studios just went
through as they attempted to create a Classic version of Mickey & Minnie.
One that would then allow this popular pair to become part of Disney Infinity
3.0.

"I won't lie to you. We were under a lot of pressure to
get the look of this particular version of Mickey — he's called Red Pants
Mickey around here — just right," said Jeff Bunker, the VP of Art
Development at Avalanche Studios, during a recent phone interview. "When
we brought Sorcerer Mickey into Disney Infinity 1.0 back in January of 2014,
that one was relatively easy because … Well, everyone knows what Mickey Mouse
looked like when he appeared in 'Fantasia.' "

"But this time around, we were being asked to design
THE Mickey & Minnie," Bunker continued. "And given that these Classic
Disney characters have been around in various different forms for the better
part of the last century … Well, which look was the right look?"

Which is why Jeff and his team at Avalanche Studios began watching hours &
hours of Mickey Mouse shorts. As they tried to get a handle on which look would
work best for these characters in Disney Infinity 3.0.

"And we went all the way back to the very start of Mickey's career. We began
with 'Steamboat Willie' and then watched all of those black & white Mickey shorts
that Walt made back in the late 1920s & early 1930s. From there, we
transitioned to his Technicolor shorts. Which is when Mickey went from being
this pie-eyed, really feisty character to more of a well-behaved leading
man," Bunker recalled. "We then finished out our Mouse marathon by
watching all of those new Mickey shorts that Paul Rudish & his team have
been creating for Disney Television Animation. Those cartoons really recapture
a lot of the spirit and wild slapstick fun that Mickey's early, black &
white shorts had."

But given that the specific assignment that Avalanche Studios had been handed
was to create the most appealing looking, likeable version of Mickey Mouse
possible … In the end, Jeff and his team wound up borrowing bits & pieces
from a lot of different versions of the world's most famous mouse. So that
Classic Mickey would then look & move in a way that best fit the sort of
gameplay which people would soon be able to experience with Disney Infinity
3.0.

"That — in a lot of ways — was actually the toughest
part of the Classic Mickey design project. You have to remember that one of the
key creative conceits of Disney Infinity
is that all the characters which appear in this game are toys," Bunker
stated. "Okay. So they're beautifully detailed, highly stylized toy
versions of beloved Disney, Pixar, Marvel & Lucasfilm characters. But
they're still supposed to be toys. So our Classic versions of Mickey &
Minnie have the same sort of thickness & sturdiness to them that toys have.
So that they'll then be able to fit right in with all of the rest of the
characters that Avalanche Studios had previously designed for Disney Infinity."

And then there was the matter of coming up with just the
right pose for Classic Mickey & Minnie. Which — to hear Jeff tell the
story — involved input from a lot of Disney upper management.

"Everyone within the Company seemed to have an opinion
about how Mickey & Minnie should be posed. More to the point, if you Google
Mickey, you then discover that there are literally thousands of poses out there
for these two. Though — truth be told — a lot of those kind of play off the
way Mickey poses when he's being Disney's corporate symbol," Bunker said.
"But what I was most concerned about was that Mickey's pose had to work
with Minnie's pose. Because we were bringing the Classic versions of these
characters up into Disney Infinity 3.0 at the exact same time. And we wanted to
make sure — especially for those fans who like to put their Disney Infinity
figures on display — that Mickey's pose would then complement Minnie.

Which is why Jeff & the crew at Avalanche Studios
decided — when it came to Classic Mickey & Minnie's pose — that they
should go all the way back to the beginning. Which is why these two Disney icons
are sculpted in such a way that it almost seems as though you're witnessing the
very first time Mickey set eyes on Minnie.

"And what was really great about that was — as soon as
we began showing people within the Company this pose — everyone at Disney
quickly got on board with the idea. I mean, the Classic Mickey that we sculpted
for Disney Infinity 3.0 is clearly a very playful, spunky character. But at the
same time, he's obviously got eyes for Minnie," Bunker concluded. "So
in the end, we were able to come up with Classic versions of these characters
that will work well within the creative confines of Disney Infinity 3.0 but at
the same time please those Disney fans who just collect these figures because
they like the way the Disney Infinity characters look."

So now that this particular design project is over, does
Jeff regret that Mouse House upper management was so hands-on when it came to
making sure that the Classic versions of Mickey & Minnie were specifically
tailored to fit the look & style of gameplay found in Disney Infinity 3.0?

"To be blunt, we go through this every time we add a new character to the
game. The folks at Lucasfilm were just as hands-on when we were designing the
versions of Darth Vader and Yoda that will also soon be appearing in Disney
Infinity 3.0," Bunker laughed. "So in the end, if the character's
creators AND the fans are happy, then I'm happy."

This article was originally posted on the Huffington Post's Entertainment page on Tuesday, June 9, 2015