Connect with us


$175 million? $200 million? $225 million? $250 million? $300 million? Which number will wind up being the real final pricetag for “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest” ?

While the Mouse continues to crow about how much “Dead Man’s Chest” has earned worldwide to date, Disney officials have been surprisingly mum when it comes to discussing how much it actually cost the company to produce this “Pirates” sequel. Jim Hill explains why (WARNING: Article contains some mild “Pirates III” spoilers)



Let’s start with the good news: “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest” is obviously a huge hit. To date, this Gore Verbinksi film has earned $379.6 million during its domestic run as well as an additional $392.2 million overseas. For a combined total of well over three quarters of a billion dollars.

Then when you consider that this Jerry Bruckheimer production has yet to open in several incredibly lucrative international territories (I.E. Germany & Spain), it’s now looking quite likely that this “Pirates” sequel will eventually knock “Finding Nemo” off its perch as Disney’s all-time top earner (Once the final domestic & international earnings for “Dead Man’s Chest” are tallied, of course).

Which you’d think would be the cause of great celebration at the Mouse House. But instead … Well, what I’ve been hearing is that the mood inside the Team Disney Burbank building is actually quite somber. That — thanks to the high cost of producing two sequels to “Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl” back-to-back as well as the somewhat lackluster response to “Dead Man’s Chest” merchandise — it’s now looking like it might be a couple of years before the Black Pearl finally sails into the black.

Which I know must sound rather bizarre. Given that — for the past 30+ days — that’s all that the media seems to have been talking about. The obscene amount of money that this “Pirates of the Caribbean” sequel has earned to date, the various box office records that this movie has broken.

But you have to understand that — out in Hollywood — the general rule of thumb is that a motion picture must earn at least three times its production costs before it can then officially begin to turn a profit. And when it comes to “Dead Man’s Chest” … Well, Mickey hasn’t exactly been forthcoming about how much it actually cost the studio to produce this Gore Verbinski film.

Why For? According to studio insiders that I’ve spoken with, Disney has deliberately downplayed and/or been downright deceptive when it comes to discussing “Dead Man’s Chest” ‘s actual production costs because … Well, they’re reportedly very concerned about the effect that this sort of information might then have on the company’s stock price.

Copyright 2006 Walt Disney Enterprises

Mind you — were you to actually go looking for detailed information on “Dead Man’s Chest” production costs — you’d find a surprising array of numbers out there. These include:

  • $175 million: According to Merissa Marr’s June 30th report for the Wall Street Journal, the Walt Disney Company had originally set aside $350 million to cover the combined production costs of its two “Pirates” sequels. Which (in theory) would have placed “Dead Man’s Chest” & “At World’s End” production costs at $175 million apiece.
  • $200 million: Over on Terry Rossio’s MySpace page, the “Pirates” screenwriter’s on-set diary talks about the difficulty of shooting ” … two 200 million dollar back-to-back films.”
  • $225+ million: Again in her WSJ article, Marr detailed how hurricane-related problems eventually pushed “Dead Man’s Chest” & “At World’s End” combined production costs to over $450 million.
  • $250 million. In his new book, “Boffo: How I Learned to Love the Blockbuster and Fear the Bomb” (Miramax, June 2006), Peter Bart (editor-in-chief of Variety) relates how ” …Disney’s newly appointed President, Bob Iger, was nervous about the soaring production costs of the two sequels to ‘Pirates of the Caribbean,’ which were shooting back-to-back. The decision to make these films represented a $500 million bet.”

Of course, those are just the numbers that have actually made it into print. Off-the-record, studio insiders who have actually worked on the “Pirates” sequels are saying that — thanks to all of the elaborate FX sequences in “Dead Man’s Chest” and “At World’s End” — the combined production costs of these two films is now well north of $600 million.

And let’s keep in mind that we’re just talking about production costs here, folks. Not the additional $100 million that a studio typically has to spend in order to properly launch a summer blockbuster. That $600 million was supposedly spent on just producing those two motion pictures, not on their promotion & marketing.

And let’s not forget that Gore Verbinksi hasn’t actually finished shooting the third “Pirates” sequel yet. Sets are being build on the Burbank lot right now for the “At World’s End” scenes that are set on Shipwreck Island. Where the pirate Brethren will meet to discuss what they should do about the East India Tea Company (FYI: This is the sequence in the film where Keith Richards is expected to make his long-talked-about cameo appearance as Jack Sparrow’s dad). 

Copyright 2006 Walt Disney Enterprises

According to studio staffers that I’ve spoken with, it’s going to take Gore at least six more weeks of shooting before he gets everything that he needs to complete “At World’s End.” Which means — in essence — that the meter’s still running on this incredibly expensive project. That the final combined production costs of these back-to-back “Pirates” sequels could eventually reach as high as $650-$700 million.

So — given this situation — is it any wonder why Disney PR types prefer to talk about how much “Dead Man’s Chest” has earned to date? Rather than discuss how much it will eventually cost the company to complete these two hugely expensive motion pictures.

Oh, I know. Further on down the line, there’ll be all of that DVD money. Plus the revenues that will eventually be generated once “Dead Man’s Chest” turns up on pay-per-view, premium cable as well as network & cable TV. So no one’s saying that this “Pirates” sequel won’t ever turn a profit. It’s just that — given the high production costs of the two “Pirates” sequels — it may take the crew of the Black Pearl quite a while to get out of the red.

This perhaps explains why Disney Company officials are already sweating what Wall Street’s response might be to tomorrow’s third quarter earnings announcement. Given that the investment community seems to have lost a lot of its enthusiasm for the Mouse House ever since “Cars” missed its initial financial projections … Well, it’s certainly not going to help the situation that — as wildly popular as “Dead Man’s Chest” might be right now — that it’s still going to take this high priced Jerry Bruckheimer production a couple of years to finally recover all of its production costs.

And — yes — I know. I’ll be making a certain segment of the JHM readership absolutely crazy by once again daring to suggest that “Cars” is not a total success. There are folks out there who absolutely refuse to believe that there could be anyone (Whether it be on Wall Street and/or the Burbank lot) that could possibly be disappointed with how this John Lasseter film has performed at the box office over the past eight weeks.

Copyright 2006 Walt Disney Enterprises

Well, whether JHM readers want to believe me or not, there are a number of prominent people in the entertainment industry who have been openly expressing disappointment with the way “Cars” performed this summer. Take — for example — Variety columnist Ben Fritz. Who — this past Sunday in his “Is the toon business over-drawn?” piece — wrote that:

“Cars” purred to an animated $235 million in domestic B.O. But pic is Pixar’s lowest grosser since “A Bug’s Life” in 1998. Disney had pushed back the original November release date to summer, emulating the release pattern of its top pic, “Finding Nemo,” which had a domestic cume of $339 million. But “Cars” ended up doing worse than “The Incredibles” and “Monsters, Inc.,” the animation studio’s last two November openers.

Talk about damning with faint praise.

Then — when you factor in “Cars” lackluster international performance to date (racking up only $128.1 million in overseas ticket sales so far) … Well, while this John Lasseter film is far from being a flop, it’s certainly not the box office bonanza that the Walt Disney Company had been hoping it would be.

And given that “Cars” cost a reported $120 million to produce (With an additional $100 million supposedly spent on P & M) … If it weren’t for the fact that merchandise sales for this Pixar production have gone straight through the roof, this John Lasseter film would have also struggled to turn a profit.

So in case you were wondering why the studio that has the summer’s top two grossing pictures would be announcing a production cut-back … Wonder no more. While Disney officials may talk about how — by cutting back the number of films that the studio produces annually from 18-20 to just 8-10 each year — that this move is really just about quality … The fact of the matter is that cost was a key role in this decision as well.

I mean, when a company like Disney can have two motion pictures that — when you combine their total worldwide box office to date — have earned over $1.1 billion … And yet studio officials are still fretting about whether these films will actually have a large enough return-on-investment to please Wall Street …  There’s something seriously wrong with that equation.

But what you folks think? Should Disney execs really be concerned with how much it ultimately costs to make these “Pirates” sequels? Or will “Dead Man’s Chest” and “At World’s End” eventually make enough money that it won’t really matter how much the Mouse originally spent in order to produce these two motion pictures?

Your thoughts?

Jim Hill is an entertainment writer who has specialized in covering The Walt Disney Company for nearly 40 years now. Over that time, he has interviewed hundreds of animators, actors, and Imagineers -- many of whom have shared behind-the-scenes stories with Mr. Hill about how the Mouse House really works. In addition to the 4000+ articles Jim has written for the Web, he also co-hosts a trio of popular podcasts: “Disney Dish with Len Testa,” “Fine Tooning with Drew Taylor” and “Marvel US Disney with Aaron Adams.” Mr. Hill makes his home in Southern New Hampshire with his lovely wife Nancy and two obnoxious cats, Ginger & Betty.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Jens Dahlmann of LongHorn Steakhouse has lots of great tips when it comes to grilling



Listen to the Article

Sure, for some folks, the Fourth of July is all about fireworks. But for the 75% of all Americans who own a grill or a smoker, the Fourth is our Nation’s No. 1 holiday when it comes to grilling. Which is why 3 out of 4 of those folks will spend some time outside today working over a fire.

But here’s the thing: Though 14 million Americans can cook a steak with confidence because they actually grill something every week, the rest of us – because we use our grill or smoker so infrequently … Well, let’s just say that we have no chops when it comes to dealing with chops (pork, veal or otherwise).

So what’s a backyard chef supposed to in a situation like this when there’s so much at steak … er … stake? Turn to someone who really knows their way around a grill for advice. People like Jens Dahlmann, the Vice President and Corporate Executive Chef for Darden Restaurant’s LongHorn Steakhouse brand.

Given that Jens’ father & grandfather were chefs, this is a guy who literally grew up in a kitchen. In his teens & twenties, Dahlmann worked in hotels & restaurants all over Switzerland & Germany. Once he was classically trained in the culinary arts, Jens then  jumped ship. Well, started working on cruise ships, I mean.

Anyway … While working on Cunard’s Sea Goddess, Dahlmann met Sirio Maccioni, the founder of Le Cirque 2000. Sirio was so impressed with Jens’ skills in the kitchen that he offered him the opportunity to become sous-chef at this New York landmark. After four years of working in Manhattan, Dahlmann then headed south to become executive chef at Palm Beach’s prestigious Café L’Europe.

Jens Dahlmann back during his Disney World days

And once Jens began wowing foodies in Florida, it wasn’t all that long ’til the Mouse came a-calling. Mickey wanted Dahlmann to shake things up in the kitchen over at WDW’s Flying Fish Café. And he did such a good job with that Disney’s Boardwalk eatery the next thing Jens knew, he was then being asked to work his magic with the menu at the Contemporary Resort’s California Grill.

From there, Dahlmann had a relatively meteoric rise at the Mouse House. Once he became Epcot’s Food & Beverage general manager, it was only a matter of time before he wound up as the executive chef in charge of this theme park’s annual International Food & Wine Festival. Which – under Jens’ guidance – experienced some truly explosive growth.

“When I took on Food & Wine, that festival was only 35 days long and had gross revenues of just $5.5 million. When I left Disney in 2016, Food & Wine was now over 50 days long and that festival had gross revenues of $22 million,” Dahlmann admitted during a recent sit-down. “I honestly loved those 13 years I spent at Disney. When I was working there, I learned so much because I was really cooking for America.”

And it was exactly that sort of experience & expertise that Darden wanted to tap into when they lured Jens away from Mickey last year to become LongHorn Steakhouse’s new Vice President and Corporate Executive Chef. But today … Well, Dahlmann is offering tips to those of us who are thinking about cooking steak tips for the Fourth.

Photo by Jim Hill

“When you’re planning on grilling this holiday, if you’re looking for a successful result, the obvious place to start is with the quality of the meat you plan on cooking for your friends & family. If you want the best results here, don’t be cheap when you go shopping. Spend the money necessary for a fresh filet or a New York strip. Better yet a Ribeye, a nice thick one with good marbling. Because when you look at the marbling on a steak, that’s where all the flavor happens,” Jens explained. “That said, you always have to remember that — the higher you go with the quality of your meat — the less time you’re going to want that piece of meat to spend on the grill.”

And speaking of cooking … Before you even get started here, Jens suggests that you first take the time to check over all of your grilling equipment. Making sure that the grill itself is first scraped clean & then properly oiled before you then turn up the heat.

“If you’re working with a dirty grill, when you go to turn your meat, it may wind up sticking to the grill. Or maybe those spices that you’ve just so carefully coated your steak with will wind up sticking to the grill, rather than your meat,” Dahlmann continued. “Which is why it’s always worth it to spend a few minutes prior to firing up your grill properly cleaning & oiling it.”

Photo by Jim Hill

And speaking of heat … Again, before you officially get started grilling here, Jens says that it’s crucial to check your temperature gauges. Make sure that your char grill is set at 550 (so that it can then properly handle the thicker cuts of meat) and your flattop is set at 425 (so it can properly sear thinner pieces of meat).

Okay. Once you’ve bought the right cuts of quality meat, properly cleaned & oiled your grill, and then made sure that everything’s set at the right temperature (“If you can only stand to hold your hand directly over the grill for two or three seconds, that’s the right amount of heat,” Dahlmann said), it’s now time to season your steaks.

“Don’t be afraid to be bold here. You can’t be shy when it comes to seasoning your meat. You want to give it a nice coating. Largely because — if you’re using a char grill — a lot of that seasoning is just going to fall off anyway,” Jens stated. “It’s up to you to decide what sort of seasoning you want to use here. Even just some salt & pepper will enhance a steak’s flavor.”

Then – according to Dahlmann – comes the really tough part. Which is placing your meat on the grill and then fighting the urge to flip it too early or too often.

“The biggest mistake that a lot of amateur cooks make is that they flip the steak too many times. The real key to a well-cooked piece of meat is just let it be, “Jens insisted. “Of course, if you’re serving different cuts of meat at your Fourth of July feast, you always want to put your biggest thickest steak on the grill first. If you’re also cooking a New York Strip, you want to put that one on a few minutes later. But after that, just let the grill do its job and flip your meat a total of three or four times, once every three minutes or so.”

Of course, the last thing you want to do is overcook a quality piece of meat. Which is why Dahlmann suggests that – when it comes to grilling steaks – if you’re going to err, err on the side of undercooking.

“You can always put a piece of meat back on the grill if it’s slightly undercooked. When you over-cook something, all you can do then is start over with a brand-new piece of meat,” Jens said. “Just be sure that you’re using the correct cut of meat for the cooking result you’re aiming for. If someone wants a rare or medium rare steak, you should go with a thicker cut of steak. If one of your guests wants their steak cooked medium or well, it’s best to start with a thinner cut of meat.”

Photo by Jim Hill

As you can see, the folks at Longhorn take grilling steaks seriously. How seriously? Just last week at Darden Corporate Headquarters in Orlando, seven of these brand’s top grill masters (who – after weeks of regional competitions – had been culled from the 491 restaurants that make up this chain) competed for a $10,000 prize in the Company’s second annual Steak Master Series. And Dahlmann was one of the people who stood in Darden’s test kitchens, watching like a hawk as each of the contestants struggled to prepare six different dishes in just 20 minutes according to Longhorn Steakhouse’s exacting standards.

“I love that Darden does this. Recognizing the best of the best who work this restaurant,” Jens concluded. “We have a lot of people here who are incredibly knowledgeable & passionate when it comes to grilling.”

Speaking of which … If today’s story doesn’t include the exact piece of info that you need to properly grill that T-bone, just whip out your iPhone & text GRILL to 55702. Or – better yet – visit prior to firing up your grill or smoker later today. 

This article was originally published by the Huffington Post on Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Continue Reading


Brattleboro’s Strolling of the Heifers is a sincere if somewhat surreal way to spend a summer’s day in Vermont



Listen to the Article

Some people travel halfway ‘around the planet so that they can then experience the excitement of the Running of the Bulls in Pamplona. If you’re more of a Slow Living enthusiast (as I am), then perhaps you should amble to Brattleboro, VT. Where – over the first weekend in June – you can then join a herd of cow enthusiasts at the annual Strolling of the Heifers.

Now in its 16th year, this three-day long event typically gets underway on Friday night in June with a combination block party / gallery walk. But then – come Saturday morning – Main Street in Brattleboro is lined with thousands of bovine fans.

Photo by Jim Hill

They’ve staked out primo viewing spots and set up camp chairs hours ahead of time. Just so these folks can then have a front row seat as this year’s crop of calves (which all come from local farms & 4-H clubs) are paraded through the streets.

Photo by Jim Hill

Viewed from curbside, Strolling of the Heifers is kind of this weird melding of a sincere small town celebration and Pasadena’s Doo Dah Parade. Meaning that – for every entry that actually acknowledged this year’s theme (i.e. “Dance to the Moosic”) — …

Photo by Jim Hill

… there was something completely random, like this parade’s synchronized shopping cart unit.

Photo by Jim Hill

And for every piece of authentic Americana (EX: That collection of antique John Deere tractors that came chugging through the city) …

Photo by Jim Hill

… there was something silly. Like – say – a woman dressed as a Holstein pushing a baby stroller through the streets. And riding in that stroller was a pig dressed in a tutu.

Photo by Jim Hill

And given that this event was being staged in the Green Mountain State & all … Well, does it really surprise you to learn that — among the groups that marched in this year’s Strolling of the Heifers – was a group of eco-friendly folks who, with their  chants of “We’re Number One !,” tried to persuade people along the parade route not to flush the toilet after they pee. Because – as it turns out – urine can be turned into fertilizer.

Photo by Jim Hill

And speaking of fertilizer … At the tail end of the parade, there was a group of dedicated volunteers who were dealing with what came out of the tail end of all those cows.

Photo by Jim Hill

This year’s Strolling of the Heifers concluded at the Brattleboro town common. Where event attendees could then get a closer look at some of the featured units in this year’s parade…

Photo by Jim Hill

… or perhaps even pet a few of the participants.

Photo by Jim Hill

But as for the 90+ calves who took part in the 2017 edition of Strolling of the Heifers, once they reached the town common, it was now time for a nosh or a nap.

Photo by Jim Hill

Elsewhere on the common, keeping with this year’s “Dance to the Moosic” theme, various musical groups performed in & around the gazebo throughout the afternoon.

Photo by Jim Hill

While just across the way – keeping with Brattleboro’s tradition of showcasing the various artisans who live & work in the local community – some pretty funky pieces were on display at the Slow Living Exposition.

Photo by Jim Hill

All in all, attending Strolling of the Heifers is a somewhat surreal but still very pleasant way to spend a summer’s day in Vermont. And that’s no bull.

Photo by Jim Hill

Well, that could be a bull. To be honest, what with the wig & all, it’s kind of hard to tell. 

This article was originally published by the Huffington Post on Sunday, June 4, 2017

Continue Reading


Looking to make an authentic Irish meal for Saint Patrick’s Day? If so, then chef Kevin Dundon says not to cook corned beef & cabbage



Listen to the Article

Let’s at least start on a positive note: Celebrated chef, author & TV personality Kevin Dundon – the man that Tourism Ireland has repeatedly chosen as the Face of Irish Food – loves a lot of what happens in the United States on March 17th.

“I mean, look at what they do in Chicago on Saint Patrick’s Day. They toss all of this vegetable-based dye into the Chicago River and then paint it green for a day. That’s terrific,” Kevin said.

But then when it comes to what many Americans eat & drink on St. Paddy’s Day (i.e., a big plate of corned beef and cabbage. Which is then washed down with a mug of green beer) … Well, that’s where Dundon has to draw the line.

Irish celebrity chef Kevin Dundon displays a traditional Irish loin of bacon with Colcannon potatoes and a Dunbrody Kiss chocolate dessert. Photo by Tom Burton. Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved

“Green beer? No real Irishman would be caught dead drinking that stuff,” Kevin insists. “And as for eating corned beef & cabbage … That’s not actually authentic Irish fare either. Bacon and cabbage? Sure. But corned beef & cabbage was something that the Irish only began eating after they’d come to the States to escape the Famine. And even then these Irish-Americans only began serving corned beef & cabbage to their friends & family because they had to make do with the ingredients that were available to them at that time.”

And thus begins the strange tale of how corned beef & cabbage came to be associated with the North American celebration of Saint Patrick’s Day celebration. Because – according to Dundon – beef just wasn’t all that big a part of the Irish diet back in the 19th century.

To explain: Back in the Old Country, cattle – while they were obviously highly prized for the milk & cheese that they produced – were also beasts of burden. Meaning that they were often used for ploughing the fields or for hauling heavy loads. Which is why – back then — these animals were rarely slaughtered when they were still young & healthy. If anything, land owners liked to put a herd of cattle on display out in one of their pastures because that was then a sign to their neighbors that this farm was prosperous.

“Whereas pork … Well, everybody raised pigs back then. Which is why pork was a staple of the Irish diet rather than beef,” Dundon continued.

So if that’s what people actually ate back in the Old Country, how then did corned beef & cabbage come to be so strongly associated with Saint Patrick’s Day in the States.? That largely had to do with where the Irish wound up living after they arrived in the New World.

“When the Irish first arrived in America following the Great Famine, a lot of them wound up living in the inner city right alongside the Germans & the Jews, who were also recent immigrants to the States. And while that farm-fresh pork that the Irish loved wasn’t readily available, there was brisket. Which the Irish could then cure by first covering this piece of meat with corn kernel-sized pieces of rock salt – that’s how it came to be called corned beef. Because of the sizes of the pieces of rock salt that were used in the curing process – and then placing all that in a pot of water with other spices to soak for a few days.”

And as for the cabbage portion of corned beef & cabbage … Well, according to Kevin, in addition to buying their meat from the kosher delis in their neighborhood, the Irish would also frequent the stores that the German community shopped in. Where – thanks to their love of sauerkraut (i.e., pickled cabbage) – there was always a ready supply of cabbage to be had.

“So when you get right down to it, it was the American melting pot that led to corned beef & cabbage being found in the Irish-American cooking pot,” Dundon continued. “Since they couldn’t find or didn’t have easy access to the exact same ingredients that they had back in Ireland, Irish-Americans made do with what they could find in the immediate vicinity. And what they made was admittedly tasty. But it’s not actually authentic Irish fare.”

Mind you, what Kevin serves at Raglan Road Irish Pub and Restaurant at Disney Springs (which – FYI – Orlando Magazine voted as the area’s best restaurant back in 2014) is nothing if not authentic. Dundon and his team at this acclaimed gastropub pride themselves on making traditional Irish fare and then contemporized it.

Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved

“Take – for example – what we serve here instead of corned beef & cabbage. Again, because it was pork – rather than beef – that was the true staple of the Irish diet back then, what we offer instead is a loin of bacon that has been glazed with Irish Mist. That then comes with colcannon potatoes. Which is this traditional Irish dish that’s made up of mashed potato that have had some cabbage & bacon mixed through it,” Kevin enthused. “This heavenly ham – that’s what we actually call this traditional Irish dish at Raglan Road, Kevin’s Heavenly Ham – also includes some savory cabbage with a parsley cream sauce as well as a raisin cider jus. It’s simple food. But because of the basic ingredients – and that’s the real secret of Irish cuisine. That our ingredients are so strong – the flavors just pop off the plate.”

Which brings us to the real challenge that Dundon and the Raglan Road team face every day. Making sure that they actually have all of the ingredients necessary to make this traditional-yet-contemporized Irish fare to those folks who frequent this Walt Disney World favorite.

“Take – for example – the fish we serve here. We only used cold water fish. Salmon, mussels and haddock that have been hauled out of the Atlantic, the ocean that America and Ireland share,” Kevin stated. “Not that there’s anything wrong with warm water fish. It’s just that … Well, it doesn’t have the same structure. It’s a softer fish, which doesn’t really fit the parameters of Irish cuisine. And if you’re going to serve authentic food, you have to be this dedicated when it comes to sourcing your ingredients.

Copyright Mitchell Beazley. All rights reserved

And if you’re thinking of perhaps trying to serve an authentic Irish meal this year, rather than once again serving corned beef & cabbage at your Saint Patrick’s Day Feast … Well, back in September of last year, Mitchell Beazley published “The Raglan Road Cookbook: Inside America’s Favorite Irish Pub.” This 296-page hardcover not only includes the recipe for Kevin’s Heavenly Ham but also it tells the tale of how this now-world-renown restaurant wound up being built in Orlando.

On the other hand, if you happen to have to the luck of the Irish and are actually down at The Walt Disney World Resort right now, it’s worth noting that Raglan Road is right in the middle of its Mighty St. Patrick’s Day Festival. This four day-long event – which includes Irish bands and professional dancers – stretches through Sunday night. And in addition to all that authentic Irish fare that Dundon and his team are cooking up, you also sample the fine selection of beers & cocktails that this establishment’s four distinct antique bars (each of which are more than 130 years old and were imported directly from Ireland) will be serving. Just – As ucht Dé (That’s “For God’s Sake” in Gaelic) – don’t make the mistake of asking the bartender there for a mug of green beer.

“Why would anyone willingly drink something like that?,” Dundon laughed. “I mean, just imagine what their washroom will look like the morning after.”

This article was originally published by the Huffington Post on Friday, March 17, 2017

Continue Reading