Connect with us

Film & Movies

Universal Studios Florida’s “Jaws” attraction sails off into the sunset

Published

on

It’s time to say “Good-bye” to ” … the mistake on the lake.”


Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

That’s what the skippers who worked on “Jaws” used to affectionately call
this Universal Studios Florida attraction. Which will be closing later today to
supposedly make way for a brand-new Harry Potter “land” for this theme park.

But before they drain Amity Island’s 5-million gallon lagoon
and then send all seven of the sharks which used to appear in this tough-to-maintain
show to that big boneyard in the sky, I thought that it might be fun to take a
quick look back at the history of USF’s “Jaws” attraction. Which – believe it
or not – owes its very existence to former Disney CEO Michael Eisner.

Strange but true, folks. But back in November of 1979, when MCA
Inc. brought the initial 300-acre chunk of what would eventually become a 423-
acre parcel southwest of Orlando, this company intended on using that land ” … for
possible development of a movie oriented attraction patterned after the
Universal Studio Tour (in Hollywood).”


Copyright Universal Studios Hollywood. All rights reserved

“How closely patterned?,” you ask. So closely patterned that
– according to the original site plan for what was then known as Universal City
Florida – Guests were to have spent the bulk of the time that they visited this
movie-oriented recreation complex aboard a Glamour Tram. Where they would have then
rolled past recreations of some of the more popular stops of the Universal
Studios Hollywood tram. Mainly “Jaws,” “King Kong” and “Earthquake -The Big
One
.”

But as the projected construction cost of this Central
Florida entertainment complex climbed from $100 million to $170 million, MCA
Inc.’s chairman Lew Wasserman began turning to other studio heads, looking for
possible financial partners when it came to the Universal City Florida project.
Which is why – on July 29, 1981 — MCA officials presented their plans for
their proposed Orlando studio tour attraction to Paramount executives.

And who was president and chief operating officer of
Paramount Pictures back in 1981? Michael Eisner.


Michael Eisner & Bob Hope lead the first family of Disney-MGM Studios theme park down
Hollywood Boulevard on May 1, 1989 — the opening day for WDW’s third gated attraction.
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved

Now to this day, Michael Eisner insists that he was never at
this Universal City Florida informational presentation. But other people who
took part in this two-hour-long meeting (which was held in the Jack Webb Bungalow
on the Universal Studios Hollywood lot) remember things differently.  As Peter Kingston (who was then an MCA
development executive) recalled in an April 1989 interview with the Los Angeles
Times
:

“Michael Eisner was very definitely there. That’s the
only time I’ve ever met the man. He asked very intelligent questions. I was
very impressed by his grasp of the subject and equally his interest in the
subject. “

Okay. So let’s now jump ahead to April of 1985. Where Eisner
– as the newly installed Chairman and CEO of The Walt Disney Company –
announces the Mouse’s intentions to build a third gated attraction for its Walt
Disney World Resort complex. Which will be a working movie studio that offers
behind-the-scenes tours.


Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved

To say that MCA officials were upset when they heard this
news was an understatement. But what particularly galled the people who
designed the original version of Universal City Florida was when – after the
Imagineers finally unveiled their plans for what was originally known as the
Disney-MGM Studio Tour – 65 – 70% of the elements for WDW’s third theme park seem
to have been lifted directly from the 1981 site plan for MCA’s Central Florida project.

So what was Universal supposed to do in a situation like this?
Well, for a few months there, MCA officials waffled back and forth. They couldn’t
decide whether Universal should try and sue Disney or just abandon their plans for Central Florida
entirely. Try and find some other buyer to take that $13 million piece of
property that MCA Inc. owned out by Interstate 4 and the Florida Turnpike off the company’s
hands.

But in the end, MCA officials decided to push ahead with
this project. Which was why – in December of 1986 – the company announced that it
would be partnering with Cineplex Odeon Corp. to build a studio tour attraction
in Central Florida.


Universal Studios Florida concept art. Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

Mind you, the 1986 version of Universal Studios-Florida – just because of what
Disney was doing with its MGM Studio Tour attraction – has to be significantly
different than the 1981 version.

But how would they do that exactly? Bob Ward – as part of
his 2009 Lifetime Achievement Award from the Themed Entertainment Association
— recalled the moment when Universal Studios Florida planning and development
team had their big breakthrough. Given that the Imagineers had decided to “borrow”
one of Universal Studios Hollywood’s main conceits – taking a tram-load of
tourists out on a drive around the backlot – for Disney-MGM Studio Theme Park

 “We asked ourselves:
Why not allow visitors Studio access to explore the backlot on foot rather than
see it from the tram? Which led to the heretical thought: What would happen if
we got rid of the tram?”


Bob Ward in 1987 with the model for Universal Studios Florida theme park.
Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

And with that one question, Universal Studios Florida took
on a whole new look and feel. Each “land” at USF now had to work both as a visitor-friendly
theme park environment as well as a shootable street set. And as for Jaws, King
Kong and Earthquake – The Big One … Out in Hollywood, these were just two minute-long
vignettes. Whereas in Orlando, this trio were slated to become full-fledged,
stand-alone mega-attractions.

And when it came to the ride version of “Jaws,” the
Universal Studios Florida creative team spared no expense. They brought in
Steven Spielberg – the director of the original 1975 film – to serve as the
creative consultant for this theme park in March of 1987.  Who promised that USF wouldn’t just be ” … a reflection of the film(-going) experience … We
will sit you in the bike with E.T. We will have you crashing through the
centuries with Doc Brown
.”  

And how exactly was this theme park going to recreate an
attack by that 24-foot-long Great White Shark which moviegoers saw in “Jaws” ? What’s
more, how was USF going to move 2500 Guests per hour through this water-based
attraction? To answer that question, MCA Inc. turned to Ride & Show
Engineering Inc., a San Dimas, CA. based themed entertainment company.


Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

And Ride & Show Engineering Inc. – working off of
Universal Creative’s own designs – came up with a pretty compelling show. One
where animatronic sharks – “swimming” at 20 feet per second – would do things
like bite down on the “Jaws” boat’s pontoon and then take that vehicle for a
spin around this attraction’s 7-acre lagoon.

What’s more, this USF was supposed to have ended with a bang. Literally. As the
boat’s skipper first fired a grenade into this robo-shark’s mouth. Then after the Great White dove out of sight under our boat, there was supposed to
have been this slight pause before an underwater explosion would then send fake blood & plastic
shark chunks flying 10 feet up into the air.

USF’s original version of “Jaws” was certainly ambitious. Perhaps
too ambitious. On opening day in June 1990, the 3-ton mechanical sharks that
were hidden all around Amity Island worked only sporadically. Which is more
than could be said for the 37-foot-tall mechanical apes inside of “Kongfrontation
and/or those faux BART subway trains that were supposed to allow USF visitors
the chance to experience what an 8.3-on-the-Richter-scale “Earthquake” felt
like. Which is why hundreds of angry people made their way to Universal Studios
Florida’s Guest Relations office on this theme park’s Opening Day and then
demanded their money back.


Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

Well, it took three more months of “technical rehearsal”
(during which time USF gave every visitor who bought a ticket to this studio
theme park a second ticket for free. So that these people could then return at
some later date and see Universal Studios Florida when all of its rides, shows
and attractions were working properly), but Universal’s engineers finally debugged
“Kongfrontation” and “Earthquake – The Big One” and got these shows operating
consistently. Whereas “Jaws” closed in the late Summer of 1990 and then didn’t
officially re-open for business ’til early Fall of 1993.

“And why did it take so long to get ‘Jaws’ working again?,”
you query. Well, there’s a reason that all of those skippers called this USF
attraction “the mistake of the lake.” According to the lawsuit that MCA Inc.
filed in August of 1990
, it was poor workmanship on Ride and Show Engineering
Inc.’s part that made “Jaws” so difficult to operate on a consistent daily basis.
Whereas this San Dimas-based themed entertainment company insisted that
Universal hadn’t given its ride engineers enough time to do proper on-site test
& adjust. Which – given that this robotic sharks moved through the water
with the equivalent thrust of a 747 engine – meant that there were invariably
going to be breakdowns and malfunctions.

And even though Universal Studios Florida & Ride and
Show Engineering Inc. would eventually settle their respective lawsuits
out-of-court, USF was still stuck with a marquee attraction which wasn’t
working properly. What’s more, given that the “Jaws” lagoon was made up of ten thousand
cubic acres of concrete, 7500 tons of steel and nearly 2,000 miles of
electrical wire, this just wasn’t a situation that lent itself to a quick fix.


Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

So in essence, MCA had to write off the $30 million that
they had originally spent on “Jaws” and start from scratch. Which is why they
hired Intamin to build an entirely new boat-and-track ride system for this USF
attraction. As for the charter cruises that took Guests around Amity Island,
those were built by Orlando-based Regal Marine Industries Inc. And as for the
software that controlled the boats, “Jaws” special effects as well as the shark
themselves, that ride system was created by Itec Productions.

Speaking of those sharks …  Given that initial reports suggested that one
of the main reasons that the original version of “Jaws” had performed so
inconsistently back in 1990 was because some of the hi-tech gear used to power
these mechanical Great Whites hadn’t been properly waterproofed … Well,
Universal Creative was determined not to make the same mistake twice. Which is
why they then reached out to Oceaneering Technologies Inc., a Maryland company
which built heavy-duty hydraulic machinery for undersea oil rigs.

And using their expertise in underwater technology,
Oceaneering Technologies fashioned 7 robotic Great Whites which perform
consistently – day in and day out – while being submerged in water. Which then
guaranteed that “Jaws” could be operated for 12 hours straight, giving 2500 USF
visitors per hour a six minute-long thrill ride.


Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

And what was the price tag for this “Jaws” redo. An
estimated $40 – 45 million.

Mind you, even with all of this heavy-duty,
guaranteed-not-to-quit equipment that Oceaneering Technologies, Inc. had
provided, “Jaws” was still something of a maintenance nightmare. Not to mention
being prohibitively expensive to operate. Just the natural gas that was needed to
fuel this USF attraction’s fiery finale cost the theme park $2 million annually.

Which is why – after “Jaws” was officially re-opened in the
Summer of 1993 with a gala ceremony that Roy Scheider, Lorraine Gary and Spielberg himself attended – this attraction gradually shifted from being a
year-round ride to becoming something of a seasonal show. In fact, during the
Fall of 2005 when natural gas prices spiked, Universal Studios Florida shut
down “Jaws” entirely – citing the high cost of operating this attraction’s exploding-fuel-dock
sequence as the reason for this closure.


Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

But in February 2006, after natural gas costs once again dipped
(more importantly, after USF’s Guest Relations department had received hundreds
of complaints about what seemed to be the permanent closure of  “Jaws”),
Universal Studios Florida reluctantly re-opened this water-based ride. But with
so many of this theme park’s opening day attractions having already been
replaced by rides, shows and attractions there were based on current, more popular TV shows & film franchises … It was only a matter of time before “Jaws” would join “The
Funtastic World of Hanna-Barbera” and “Ghostbusters Spooktacular” at that big
theme park in the sky.

Which is why – when word came down last month that this USF
attraction was being shut down to pave the way for a yet-unnamed new “land” for
this theme park – industry observers weren’t all that surprised.  But even so, it’s just kind of sad to think Jake’s
Amity Boat Tours will be sailing off into the sunset forever sometime later today.

So do any of you folks have fond memories of USF’s “Jaws” ? Or – for that
matter — did anyone of you ever get the chance to ride the original version of
this attraction? And – if so – how did the 1990 original compare to the 1993
redo?


Copyright Universal Orlando. All rights reserved

Your thoughts?

Did you enjoy today’s article. If so … Well, why not show your appreciation — not mention helping JHM to get off to a happy & prosperous start in 2012 — by dropping a little something-something in the site’s tip jar.

Jim Hill is an entertainment writer who has specialized in covering The Walt Disney Company for nearly 40 years now. Over that time, he has interviewed hundreds of animators, actors, and Imagineers -- many of whom have shared behind-the-scenes stories with Mr. Hill about how the Mouse House really works. In addition to the 4000+ articles Jim has written for the Web, he also co-hosts a trio of popular podcasts: “Disney Dish with Len Testa,” “Fine Tooning with Drew Taylor” and “Marvel US Disney with Aaron Adams.” Mr. Hill makes his home in Southern New Hampshire with his lovely wife Nancy and two obnoxious cats, Ginger & Betty.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Film & Movies

Before He Was 626: The Surprisingly Dark Origins of Disney’s Stitch

Published

on

Hopes are high for Disney’s live-action version of Lilo & Stitch, which opens in theaters next week (on May 23rd to be exact). And – if current box office projections hold – it will sell more than $120 million worth of tickets in North America.

Stitch Before the Live-Action: What Fans Need to Know

But here’s the thing – there wouldn’t have been a hand-drawn version of Stitch to reimagine as a live-action film if it weren’t for Academy Award-winner Chris Sanders. Who – some 40 years ago – had a very different idea in mind for this project. Not an animated film or a live-action movie, for that matter. But – rather – a children’s picture book.

Sanders revealed the true origins of Lilo & Stitch in his self-published book, From Pitch to Stitch: The Origins of Disney’s Most Unusual Classic.

From Picture Book to Pitch Meeting

Chris – after he graduated from CalArts back in 1984 (this was three years before he began working for Disney) – landed a job at Marvel Comics. Which – because Marvel Animation was producing the Muppet Babies TV show – led to an opportunity to design characters for that animated series.

About a year into this gig (we’re now talking 1985), Sanders – in his time away from work – began noodling on a side project. As Chris recalled in From Pitch to Stitch:

“Early in my animation career, I tried writing a picture book that centered around a weird little creature that lived a solitary life in the forest. He was a monster, unsure of where he had come from, or where he belonged. I generated a concept drawing, wrote some pages and started making a sculpted version of him. But I soon abandoned it as the idea seemed too large and vague to fit in thirty pages or so.”

We now jump ahead 12 years or so. Sanders has quickly moved up through the ranks at Walt Disney Animation Studios. So much so that – by 1997 – Chris is now the Head of Story on Disney’s Mulan.

A Monster in the Forest Becomes Stitch on Earth

With Mulan deep in production, Sanders was looking for his next project when an opportunity came his way.

“I had dinner with Tom Schumacher, who was president of Feature Animation at the time. He asked if there was anything I might be interested in directing. After a little reflection, I realized that there was something: That old idea from a decade prior.”

When Sanders told Schumacher about the monster who lived alone in the forest…

“Tom offered the crucial observation that – because the animal world is already alien to us – I should consider relocating the creature to the human world.”

With that in mind, Chris dusted off the story and went to work.

Over the next three months, Sanders created a pitch book for the proposed animated film. What he came up with was very different from the version of Lilo & Stitch that eventually hit theaters in 2002.

The Most Dangerous Creature in the Known Universe

The pitch – first shared with Walt Disney Feature Animation staffers on January 9, 1998 – was titled: Lilo & Stitch: A love story of a girl and what she thinks is a dog.

This early version of Stitch was… not cute. Not cuddly. He was mean, selfish, self-centered – a career criminal. When the story opens, Stitch is in a security pod at an intergalactic trial, found guilty of 12,000 counts of hooliganism and attempted planetary enslavement.

Instead of being created by Jumba, Stitch leads a gang of marauders. His second-in-command? Ramthar, a giant, red shark-like brute.

When Stitch refuses to reveal the gang’s location, he’s sentenced to life on a maximum-security asteroid. But en route, his gang attacks the prison convoy. In the chaos, Stitch escapes in a hijacked pod and crash-lands on Earth.

Earth in Danger, Jumba on the Hunt

Terrified of what Stitch could do to our technologically inferior planet, the Grand Council Woman sends bounty hunter Jumba – along with a rule-abiding Cultural Contamination Control agent named Pleakley – to retrieve (or eliminate) Stitch.

Their mission must be secret, follow Earth laws, and – most importantly – ensure no harm comes to any humans.

Naturally, Stitch ignores all that.

After his crash, Stitch claws out of the wreckage, sees the lights of a nearby town, and screams, “I will destroy you all!” That plan is immediately derailed when he’s run over by a convoy of sugar cane trucks.

Waking up in the local humane society, Stitch sees a news report confirming the Federation is already hot on his trail. He needs to blend in. Fast.

Enter Lilo

Lilo is a lonely little girl, mourning her parents, looking for a pet. Stitch plays the role of a “cute little doggie” because it’s a means to an end. At this point, Lilo is just someone to use while he builds a communications device.

Using parts from her toys and a stolen police radio, Stitch contacts his old gang. But Ramthar, now the leader, isn’t thrilled. Still, Stitch sends a signal.

Then he builds an army.

Stitch Goes Full Skynet

Stitch constructs a small robot, sends it to the junkyard to build bigger robots. Soon, he has an army. When Ramthar and crew arrive, Stitch’s robots surround them. Ramthar is furious, but Stitch regains command.

Next, Stitch sets his robotic horde on a nearby town. Everything goes smoothly until a robot targets the hula studio where Lilo is dancing. As it lifts her in its claw, Stitch has a change of heart. He saves her.

From here, the plot begins to resemble the Lilo & Stitch we know today. Sort of.

The Ending That Never Was

In Sanders’ original version, it’s not Captain Gantu who kidnaps Lilo, but Ramthar. And when the Grand Council Woman comes to collect Stitch, Lilo produces a receipt from the humane society.

“I paid a $4 processing fee to adopt him. If you take Stitch, you’re stealing.”

The Grand Council Woman crumples the receipt and says, “I didn’t see it.”

Nani chimes in: “Well, I saw it.”

Then Jumba. Then one of Stitch’s old crew. Then a hula girl. And finally, Pleakley pulls out his CCC badge and says:

“Well, I am Pleakley Grathor, Cultural Contamination Control Agent No. 444. And I saw it.”

Pleakley saves Stitch.

How Roy E. Disney Made Stitch Cuddly

Ultimately, this version of Lilo & Stitch was streamlined. Roy E. Disney believed Stitch shouldn’t be nasty. Just naughty. And not by choice – he was designed that way.

Which is how Stitch became Experiment 626. A misunderstood creation of Jumba the mad scientist, not a hardened criminal with a vendetta.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Ricardo Montalbán’s Lost Role

Here’s a detail that even hardcore Lilo & Stitch fans may not know: Ricardo Montalbán—best known as Mr. Roarke from Fantasy Island and Khan Noonien Singh from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan—was originally cast as the voice of Ramthar, Stitch’s second-in-command in this early version of the film. He had already recorded a significant amount of dialogue before the story was reworked following Roy E. Disney’s guidance. When Stitch evolved from a ruthless galactic outlaw to a misunderstood genetic experiment, Montalbán’s character (and much of the original gang concept) was written out entirely.

Which is kind of wild when you think about it. Wrath of Khan is widely considered the gold standard of Star Trek films. So yes, for a time, Khan himself was supposed to be part of Disney’s weirdest sci-fi comedy.

Stitch’s Legacy (and Why It Still Resonates)

Looking back at Stitch’s original story, it’s wild to think how close we came to getting a very different kind of movie. One where our favorite blue alien was less “ohana means family” and more “I’ll destroy you all.” But that transformation—from outlaw to outcast to ohana—is exactly what makes Lilo & Stitch so special.

So as the live-action version prepares to hit theaters, keep in mind that behind all the cuddly merch and tiki mugs lies one of Disney’s strangest, boldest, and most hard-won reinventions. One that started with a forest monster and became a beloved franchise about found family.

June 26th is officially Stitch Day—so mark your calendar. It’s a good excuse to celebrate just how far this little blue alien has come.

Continue Reading

Film & Movies

How “An American Tail” Led to Disney’s “Hocus Pocus”

Published

on

Over the last week, I’ve been delving into Witches Run Amok, Shannon Carlin’s oral history of the making of Disney’s Hocus Pocus. This book reveals some fascinating behind-the-scenes stories about the 1993 film that initially bombed at the box office but has since become a cult favorite, even spawning a sequel in 2022 that went on to become the most-watched release in Disney+ history.

But what really caught my eye in this 284-page hardcover wasn’t just the tales of Hocus Pocus’s unlikely rise to fame. Rather, it was the unexpected connections between Hocus Pocus and another beloved film—An American Tail. As it turns out, the two films share a curious origin story, one that begins in the mid-1980s, during the early days of the creative rebirth of Walt Disney Studios under Michael Eisner, Frank Wells, and Jeffrey Katzenberg.

The Birth of An American Tail

Let’s rewind to late 1984/early 1985, a period when Eisner, Wells, and Katzenberg were just getting settled at Disney and were on the hunt for fresh projects that would signal a new era at the studio. During this time, Katzenberg—tasked with revitalizing Disney Feature Animation—began meeting with talent across Hollywood, hoping to find a project that could breathe life into the struggling division.

One such meeting was with a 29-year-old writer and illustrator named David Kirschner. At the time, Kirschner’s biggest credit was illustrating children’s books featuring Muppets and Sesame Street characters, but he had an idea for a new project: a TV special about a mouse emigrating to America, culminating in the mouse’s arrival in New York Harbor on the same day as the dedication of the Statue of Liberty in 1886.

David Kirschner
David Kirschner (IMDb)

Katzenberg saw the patriotic appeal of the concept but ultimately passed on it, as he was focused on finding full-length feature projects for Disney’s animation department. Kirschner, undeterred, took his pitch elsewhere—to none other than Kathleen Kennedy, Steven Spielberg’s production partner. Kennedy was intrigued and invited Kirschner to Spielberg’s annual Fourth of July party to pitch the idea directly to the famed director.

Spielberg immediately saw the potential in Kirschner’s idea, but instead of a TV special, he envisioned a full-length animated feature film. This project would eventually become An American Tail, a tribute of sorts to Spielberg’s own grandfather, Philip Posner, who emigrated from Russia to the United States in the late 19th century. The film’s lead character, Fievel, was even named after Spielberg’s grandfather, whose Yiddish name was also Fievel.

Disney’s Loss Becomes Universal’s Gain

An American Tail went on to become a major success for Universal Pictures, which hadn’t been involved in an animated feature since the release of Pinocchio in Outer Space in 1965. Meanwhile, over at Disney, Eisner and Wells weren’t exactly thrilled that Katzenberg had let such a promising project slip through his fingers.

Not wanting to miss out on any future opportunities with Kirschner, Katzenberg quickly scheduled another meeting with him to discuss any other ideas he might have. And as fate would have it, Kirschner had just written a short story for Muppet Magazine called Halloween House, about a boy who is magically transformed into a cat by a trio of witches.

The Pitch That Sealed the Deal

Knowing Katzenberg could be a tough sell, Kirschner went all out to impress during his pitch. He requested access to the Disney lot 30 minutes early to set the stage for his presentation. When Katzenberg and the Disney development team walked into the conference room, they were greeted by a table covered in candy corn, a cauldron of dry ice fog, and a broom, mop, and vacuum cleaner suspended from the ceiling as if they were flying—evoking the magical world of Halloween House.

Katzenberg was reportedly unimpressed by the theatrical setup, muttering, “Oy, show-and-tell time” as he took his seat. But Kirschner knew exactly how to grab his attention. He started his pitch with the fact that Halloween was a billion-dollar business—a figure that made Katzenberg sit up and take notice. He listened attentively to Kirschner’s pitch, and by the time the meeting was over, Katzenberg was convinced. Halloween House would become Hocus Pocus, and Disney had its next big Halloween film.

A Bit of Hollywood Drama

Interestingly, Kirschner’s success with Hocus Pocus didn’t sit well with his old collaborators. About a year after the film’s release, Kirschner ran into Kathleen Kennedy at an Amblin holiday party, and she wasted no time in expressing her disappointment. According to Kirschner, Kennedy said, “You really hurt Steven.” When Kirschner asked how, she explained that Spielberg and Kennedy had given him his big break with An American Tail, but when he came up with the idea for his next film, he brought it to Disney rather than to them.

Hollywood can be a place where loyalty is valued—or, at least, perceived loyalty. At the same time, this was happening just as Katzenberg was leaving Disney and partnering with Spielberg and David Geffen to launch DreamWorks SKG, which only added to the tension. Loyalty, as Kirschner found out, can be an abstract concept in the entertainment industry.

A Halloween Favorite is Born

Despite its rocky start at the box office in 1993, Hocus Pocus has gone on to become a beloved part of Halloween pop culture. And, as Carlin’s book details, its success helped pave the way for more Disney Halloween-themed projects in the years that followed.

As for why Hocus Pocus was released in July of 1993 instead of during Halloween? That’s a story for another time, but it has something to do with another Halloween-themed project Disney was working on that year—Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas—and Katzenberg finding himself in the awkward position of having to choose between keeping Bette Midler or Tim Burton happy.

For more behind-the-scenes stories about Hocus Pocus and other Disney films, be sure to check out Witches Run Amok by Shannon Carlin. It’s a fascinating read for any Disney fan!

And if you love hearing these kinds of behind-the-scenes stories about animation and film history, be sure to check out Fine Tooning with Drew Taylor, where Drew and I dive deep into all things movies, animation, and the creative decisions that shape the films we love. You can find us on your favorite podcast platforms or right here on JimHillMedia.com.

Continue Reading

Film & Movies

How Disney’s “Bambi” led to the creation of Smokey Bear

Published

on

When people talk about Disney’s “Bambi,” the scene that they typically cite as being the one from this 1942 film which then scarred them for life is – of course – the moment in this movie where Bambi’s mother gets shot by hunters.

Which is kind of ironic. Given that – if you watch this animated feature today – you’ll see that a lot of this ruined-my-childhood scene actually happens off-camera. I mean, you hear the rifle shot that takes down Bambi’s Mom. But you don’t actually see that Mama Deer get clipped.

Now for the scariest part of that movie that you actually see on-camera … Hands down, that has to be the forest fire sequence in “Bambi.” As the grown-up Bambi & his bride, Faline, desperately race through those woods, trying to find a path to safety as literally everything around them is ablaze … That sequence is literally nightmare fuel.

Source: Economist.com

Mind you, the artists at Walt Disney Animation Studios had lots of inspiration for the forest fire sequence in “Bambi.” You see, in a typical year, the United States experiences – due to either natural phenomenon like lightning strikes or human carelessness – 100 forest fires. Whereas in 1940 (i.e., the year that Disney Studios began working in earnest of a movie version of Felix Salten’s best-selling movie), America found itself battling a record 360 forest fires.

Which greatly concerned the U.S. Forest Service. But not for the reason you might think.

Protecting the Forest for World War II

I mean, yes. Sure. Officials over in the Agricultural Department (That’s the arm of the U.S. government that manages the Forest Service) were obviously concerned about the impact that this record number of forest fires in 1940 had had on citizens. Not to mention all of the wildlife habitat that was now lost.

But to be honest, what really concerned government officials was those hundreds of thousands of acres of raw timber that had been consumed by these blazes. You see, by 1940, the world was on the cusp of the next world war. A conflict that the U.S. would inevitably  be pulled into. And all that now-lost timber? It could have been used to fuel the U.S. war machine.

So with this in mind (and U.S. government officials now seeing an urgent need to preserve & protect this precious resource) … Which is why – in 1942 (just a few months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor) – the U.S. Forest Service rolls out its first-ever forest fire prevention program.

Which – given that this was the early days of World War II – the slogan that the U.S. Forest Service initially chose for its forest fire prevention program is very in that era’s we’re-all-in-this-together / so-let’s-do-what-we-can-to-help-America’s war-effort esthetic – made a direct appeal to all those folks who were taking part in scrap metal drives: “Forest Defense is National Defense.”

Source: Northwestern

And the poster that the U.S. Forest Service had created to support this campaign? … Well, it was well-meaning as well.  It was done in the WPA style and showed men out in the forest, wielding shovels to ditch a ditch. They were trying to construct a fire break, which would then supposedly slow the forest fire that was directly behind them.

But the downside was … That “Forest Defense is National Defense” slogan – along with that poster which the U.S. Forest Service had created to support their new forest fire prevention program didn’t exactly capture America’s attention.

I mean, it was the War Years after all. A lot was going in the country at that time. But long story short: the U.S. Forest Service’s first attempt at launching a successful forest fire prevention program sank without a trace.

So what do you do in a situation like this? You regroup. You try something different.

Disney & Bambi to the Rescue

And within the U.S. government, the thinking now was “Well, what if we got a celebrity to serve as the spokesman for our new forest fire prevention program? Maybe that would then grab the public’s attention.”

The only problem was … Well, again, these are the War Years. And a lot of that era’s A-listers (people like Jimmy Stewart, Clark Gable, even Mel Brooks) had already enlisted. So there weren’t really a lot of big-name celebrities to choose from.

But then some enterprising official at the U.S. Forest Service came up with an interesting idea. He supposedly said “Hey, have you seen that new Disney movie? You know, the one with the deer? That movie has a forest fire in it. Maybe we should go talk with Walt Disney? Maybe he has some ideas about how we can better capture the public’s attention when it comes to our new forest fire prevention program?”

And it turns Walt did have an idea. Which was to use this government initiative as a way to cross-promote Disney Studio’s latest full-length animated feature, “Bambi.” Which been first released to theaters in August of 1942.

So Walt had artists at Disney Studio work up a poster that featured the grown-up versions of Bambi the Deer, Thumper the Rabbit & Flower the Skunk. As this trio stood in some tall grasses, they looked imploring out at whoever was standing in front of this poster. Above them was a piece of text that read “Please Mister, Don’t Be Careless.” And below these three cartoon characters was an additional line that read “Prevent Forest Fires. Greater Danger Than Ever!”

Source: USDA

According to folks I’ve spoken with at Disney’s Corporate Archives, this “Bambi” -based promotional campaign for the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention campaign was a huge success. So much so that – as 1943 drew to a close – this division of the Department of Agriculture reportedly reached out to Walt to see if he’d be willing to let the U.S. Forest Service continue to use these cartoon characters to help raise the public’s awareness of fire safety.

Walt – for reasons known only to Mr. Disney – declined. Some have suggested that — because “Bambi” had actually lost money during its initial theatrical release in North America – that Walt was now looking to put that project behind him. And if there were posters plastered all over the place that then used the “Bambi” characters that then promoted the U.S.’s forest fire prevention efforts … Well, it would then be far harder for Mr. Disney to put this particular animated feature in the rear view mirror.

Introducing Smokey Bear

Long story short: Walt said “No” when it came to reusing the “Bambi” characters to promote the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention program. But given how successful the previous cartoon-based promotional campaign had been … Well, some enterprising employee at the Department of Agriculture reportedly said “Why don’t we come up with a cartoon character of our own?”

So – for the Summer of 1944 – the U.S. Forest Service (with the help of the Ad Council and the National Association of State Foresters) came up with a character to help promote the prevention of forest fires. And his name is Smokey Bear.

Now a lot of thought had gone into Smokey’s creation. Right from the get-go, it was decided that he would be an American black bear (NOT a brown bear or a grizzly). To make this character seem approachable, Smokey was outfitted with a ranger’s hat. He also wore a pair of blue jeans & carried a bucket.

As for his debut poster, Smokey was depicted as pouring water over a still-smoldering campfire. And below this cartoon character was printed Smokey’s initial catchphrase. Which was “Care will prevent 9 out of 10 forest fires!”

Source: NPR

Which makes me think that this slogan was written by the very advertising executive who wrote “Four out of five dentists recommend sugarless gum for their patients who chew gum.”

Anyway … By the Summer of 1947, Smokey got a brand-new slogan. The one that he uses even today. Which is “Only YOU can prevent forest fires.”

The Real Smokey Bear

Now where this gets interesting is – in the Summer of 1950 – there was a terrible forest fire up in the Capitan Mountains of New Mexico. And over the course of this blaze, a bear cub climbed high up into a tree to try & escape those flames.

Firefighters were finally able to rescue that cub. But he was so badly injured in that fire that he was shipped off to the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. and nursed back to health. And since this bear really couldn’t be released back in the wild at this point, he was then put on exhibit.

And what does this bear’s keepers decide to call him? You guessed it: Smokey.

Source: USDA

And due to all the news coverage that this orphaned bear got, he eventually became the living symbol of the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention program. Which then meant that this particular Smokey Bear got hit with a ton of fan mail. So much so that the National Zoo in Washington D.C. wound up with its own Zip Code.

“Smokey the Bear” Hit Song

And on the heels of a really-for-real Smokey Bear taking up residence in our nation’s capital, Steve Nelson & Jack Rollins decide to write a song that shined a spotlight on this fire-fightin’ bruin. Here’s the opening stanza:

With a ranger’s hat and shovel and a pair of dungarees,
You will find him in the forest always sniffin’ at the breeze,
People stop and pay attention when he tells them to beware
Because everybody knows that he’s the fire-preventin’ bear

Believe or not, even with lyrics like these, “Smokey the Bear” briefly topped the Country charts in the Summer of 1950. Thanks to a version of this song that was recorded by Gene Autry, the Singing Cowboy.

By the way, it was this song that started all of the confusion in regards to Smokey Bear’s now. You see, Nelson & Rollins – because they need the lyrics of their song to scan properly – opted to call this fire-fightin’-bruin Smokey THE Bear. Rather than Smokey Bear. Which has been this cartoon character’s official name since the U.S. Forest Service first introduced him back in 1944.

“The Ballad of Smokey the Bear”

Further complicating this issue was “The Ballad of Smokey the Bear,” which was a stop-motion animated special that debuted on NBC in late November of 1966. Produced by Rankin-Bass as a follow-up to their hugely popular “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” (which premiered on the Peacock Network in December of 1964) … This hour-long TV show also put a “THE” in the middle of Smokey Bear’s name because the folks at Rankin-Bass thought his name sounded better that way.

And speaking of animation … Disney’s “Bambi” made a brief return to the promotional campaign for the U.S. Forest Service’s forest fire prevention program in the late 1980s. This was because the Company’s home entertainment division had decided to release this full-length animated feature on VHS.

What’s kind of interesting, though, is the language used on the “Bambi” poster is a wee different than the language that’s used on Smokey’s poster. It reads “Protect Our Forest Friends. Only You Can Prevent Wildfires.” NOT “Forest Fires.”

Anyway, that’s how Disney’s “Bambi” led to the creation of Smokey Bear. Thanks for bearin’ with me as I clawed my way through this grizzly tale.

Continue Reading

Trending