General
“Oh ho, the Wells Fargo Wagon is a-comin …” again
As anticipation builds for next month’s airing of “The Music Man” on ABC’s “The Wonderful World of Disney,” Jim Hill asks: What happens when you remake a musical that (perhaps) doesn’t really need remaking?
There’s a story that’s long been told about Sir Donald Wolfit, the last of the great English actor/managers. Wolfit is lying on his death bed when one of his young actors supposedly comes in and says “Sir Donald, after a life filled with so much fame and success, dying must be so hard.’
Sir Donald reportedly then turned to the actor and said “Dying is easy … comedy is hard.”
Well, if comedy is hard, then musical comedy must be damned near impossible. Given how few people actually do it well these days.
That’s why we’re lucky to have Craig Zadan and Neil Meron of Storyline Entertainment. Because these two guys are actually doing the impossible. They’re bringing quality musical comedy back to the movies and television.
You know the movie version of “Chicago” that’s out in theaters right now? The one’s that gotten all those great reviews as well as racking up 8 Golden Globe nominations? That’s Craig and Neal’s baby.
And that upcoming TV movie version of “The Music Man” that ABC’s so busily hyping? The one that stars Matthew Broderick, which will be airing February 16th on “The Wonderful World of Disney”? That too is a Storyline Entertainment production.
Pretty impressive, eh? That’s nothing. Zadan and Meron also have in the works TV movie versions of such Broadway classics as “Fiddler on the Roof” and “Mame.” In addition, these guys are looking into taking the stage version of Disney’s 1996 feature length cartoon, “The Hunchback of Notre Dame,” that’s been running in Berlin these past few years and turning that into a live action musical for television as well.
Best of all — at least from the Mouse’s point of view — all of these projects are all expected to air on ABC. Which will (hopefully) translate into big ratings for the network. At least that’s what happened when Storyline Entertainment’s version of “Cinderella” debuted on “The Wonderful Wonder of Disney” in November 1997, followed by “Annie” in November 1999.
So how does one end up in the musical comedy resurrection business? Well, it helps if one actually has a love of musical theater. Zadan — as it turns out — is a big-time Broadway buff. Craig wrote one of the earlier definitive texts on the career of musical wunderkind Stephen Sondheim (“Sondheim & Co.,” Harper & Row) back in 1986.
But Zadan wasn’t strictly an academic. Someone who stood outside, just observing how shows were made. He was also a guy who liked to get his hands dirty. Which was how Zadan ended up producing the 1984 hit movie, “Footloose.”
Of course, Neil Meron was no slouch either. Before hooking up with Craig, Neil served as president of creative affairs for Keith Barish Productions, the film production company that produced “Big Trouble in Little China” and “Her Alibi” (as well as having a hand in the launch of the “Planet Hollywood” restaurant chain).
Given that Meron shared Zadan’s love of classic musical theater, it was only a matter of time before these two would form a production company of their very own — Storyline Entertainment — and begin shopping around the idea of resurrecting great old Broadway shows to the studios and the networks.
As it turns out, CBS was the first company to take a chance on the team. That network gave them the funding necessary to mount a brand new television version of Jule Stein and Stephen Sondheim’s classic, “Gypsy.” This landmark musical had been revived on Broadway several times since the first production (which starred Ethel Merman as the stage mother from hell, Mama Rose) premiered back in 1959. Unfortunately, “Gypsy”‘s reputation had been tainted somewhat by a rather lackluster movie version of the musical (which starred Rosalind Russell) which was released back in 1962.
Zadan and Meron sought to remove that onus by staging an all-new version of “Gypsy” for television in 1994. And they scored a real coup by persuading Bette Midler to do her first ever TV movie. Lucky for Craig and Neil, Midler was just simply sensational as Mama Rose. The project — which also starred Peter Riegert as Herbie and Cynthia Gibb as Louise — got rave reviews as well as winning several Emmies and Golden Globes.
The Walt Disney Company (of course) took notice of “Gypsy”‘s success and asked Storyline Entertainment if they might consider producing some musicals for television for the network they’d just acquired, ABC / Cap Cities. Co-incidentally, Zadan and Meron had a property that they felt would be just perfect for their first project for the Mouse House: a remake of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s made-for-TV musical, “Cinderella.”
Craig and Neil supposedly felt that R & H’s “Cinderella” had lost a lot of its fun and fizz when the 1957 black and white original (which starred Julie Andrews, by the way) was remade in 1965 as a full color television extravaganza (which starred Leslie Anne Warren). So their main goal was to re-imagine this project so that it would be entertaining for the MTV generation, while still attempting to recapture much of the magic and romance that the 1957 original had had.
To pull this off, Zadan and Meron really piled on the star power. Pop diva Whitney Houston (who was also co-executive producer of “Cinderella”) was hired to play the Fairy Godmother, while Houston herself chose pop vocalist and “Moesha” star Brandy to play the title role. Filling out the supporting cast was Academy Award winner Whoopi Goldberg as the Queen, “Seinfeld” star Jason Alexander as her steward, and Broadway favorites Bernadette Peters (as the wicked step-mother) and Victor Garber (as the King).
Craig and Neil then surrounded their stars with bold new arrangements of R & H’s classic songs as well as superb production values. The end result was another critical sensation for Storyline Entertainment and a ratings smash for ABC’s “Wonderful World of Disney” during the crucial November 1997 sweeps period. Which is why Mouse House executives then turned to Zadan and Meron and asked: “Can we get another one of these every year from here on in?”
Sadly, quality musicals for television take quite a while to mount properly. So it wouldn’t be ’til November 1999 ’til Craig and Neil would have another resurrected / re-imagined Broadway classic ready to air on ABC’s “Wonderful World of Disney.” But this project — “Annie” — managed to top everything that Storyline Entertainment had done to date.
Putting it simply, the TV movie version of “Annie” — based on the long running hit — really was a resurrection. An attempt to repair the reputation of a Broadway favorite that had been damaged by the miserable movie version of the show that Columbia Pictures had produced back in 1982.
Have any of you seen this film lately? It’s damned near unwatchable. Admittedly, this version of “Annie” has an absolutely stellar cast — Carol Burnett as Miss Hannigan, Albert Finney as Daddy Warbucks, Ann Reinking as Grace Farrell, and Tim Curry as Rooster — along with some pretty decent production values.
But, in the end, the studio just didn’t seem to trust the show’s source material. Which is why Columbia Pictures ordered screenwriter Carol Sobieski to totally rework Thomas Meehan’s book as well as insisting that the show’s composers write some new songs to the score. The end product — which was directed by screen legend John Huston — bares little resemble to the show that won the 1977 Tony Award for best musical.
Luckily, Zadan and Meron knew what a gem “Annie” actually was. Which is why — as they began to mount their new TV movie version of the property — they insisted that screenwriter Irene Mecchi (best known for her work on Disney’s “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” and “Hercules”) avoid the cartoonish excesses of the Columbia Pictures’ version of this play (I.E. A drunken Miss Hannigan riding an elephant. Annie dangling from an open drawbridge, about to be rescued by Punjab, who’s hanging from an autogyro, etc. )
Instead, Craig and Neil asked Irene to realistically portray the grittier aspects of “Annie”‘s Depression era setting. But most of all Zadan and Meron wanted the screenwriter to concentrate on the real heart of the story. Which was how this gruff billionaire ended up losing his heart to a tough little orphan girl.
Craig and Neil also saw to it that Charles Strouse and Martin Charnin’s award winning score for “Annie” shined like it never had before by recruiting Disney vet Chris Montan to handle all of the TV movie’s music. (If you’ve ever hummed a tune from a Disney film that’s been made over the past 10 years, you can thank Chris. Why? Because Mr. Montan is the president of Walt Disney Music. And he personally oversees the creation of the scores for all of Disney’s animated features and theatrical productions.)
Then — borrowing a page from their “Cinderella” playbook — Zadan and Meron loaded “Annie” up with stars. They first hired Academy Award winner Kathy Bates to play Miss Hannigan, then recruited Broadway vets Victor Garber, Audra McDonald, Alan Cummings and Kristen Chenoweth to play Daddy Warbucks, Grace Farrell, Rooster and Lily St. Regis, respectively.
For the show’s crucial title role, Craig and Neil cast a talented newcomer, Alicia Morton. And — as a special treat for theater fans — they also hired Andrea McArdle, (the actress who had originally played the title role in “Annie” when the show first debuted on Broadway back in the late 1970s) to do a special cameo in the show. That’s Andrea — all grown up — playing the “Star-to-be” in the TV movie’s big “NYC” production number.
“Annie” debuted on “The Wonderful World of Disney” on November 7, 1999. This new TV movie version of the musical garnered so many great reviews and did so well in the ratings that ABC actually decided to rerun the special again less than a month later, as part of the network’s holiday line-up. The show then went on to win two Emmys (for best choreography and music direction).
Given that a lot of the reviews for “Annie” said things like “Gee, isn’t it a shame that no one makes musicals as entertaining as this for the big screen anymore?,” Harvey Weinstein over at Miramax (Disney’s art house arm) took notice. Why for? Well, Harvey had been struggling for years to try and produce a big screen version of Bob Fosse’s bitter Broadway smash, “Chicago.” Thinking that the staff of Storyline Entertainment might finally hold the key to solving his long-in-development dilemma, Weinstein recruited Zadan and Meron (as well as the director of the TV movie version of “Annie,” Broadway vet Rob Marshall) to shepherd “Chicago” to the silver screen.
Given all the effort involved in producing that motion picture (as well as setting up a slew of smaller but no less successful TV movies for ABC, including “Life with Judy Garland: Me and My Shadows,” “Brian’s Song,” and “The Beach Boys”), Craig and Neil’s dance card was pretty full for the past three years. But — in early 2002 — these two finally did find time to return to their first love. Which is creating all-new versions of Broadway classics to air on television.
So which somewhat tarnished musical did Zadan and Meron chose as their return vehicle to the tube? This decision actually shocked and puzzled some musical theater buffs: Meredith Willson’s “The Music Man.”
So why would theater fans be shocked and/or surprised at Craig and Neil’s choice? Because up until now, these guys have specialized in remounting shows whose reputations had been somewhat sullied by lousy movie versions and/or lackluster remakes of earlier TV movies.
But “The Music Man” was a property that wasn’t really in need of Zadan and Meron’s resuscitation efforts. After all, Warner Brothers had produced a very successful movie version of the 1957 Broadway hit back in 1962, in which Robert Preston reprised his Tony Award-winning role as con man extraordinaire Professor Harold Hill and leading lady (and future Mrs. Partridge) Shirley Jones played the feisty River City librarian Marian Paroo.
And as recently as April 2000, Meredith Willson’s “The Music Man” had been successfully revived on Broadway. With Craig Bierko now playing Professor Hill, this revival (which was staged by Susan Stroman, now best known as her Tony Award winning direction of the mega-hit, “The Producers”) got good reviews and played to packed houses for many months at the Neil Simon theater. Unfortunately, due to the ticket buying slump that hit Broadway in the wake of the 9/11 tragedy, the latest professional production of “The Music Man” was forced to close on December 30, 2001. On the upside, a road company version of this very same revival has been touring the country since October 2001.
So, if “The Music Man” is still a very successful show, then why should Craig and Neil attempt to resurrect / re-imagine this particular musical? I mean, why fix what ain’t broken?
Well, the key to this new production is location. As in: The 1962 Warner Brothers version — which featured great character actors in supporting roles like Paul Ford, Hermione Gingold, Buddy Hackett and Mary Wickes as well as little Ron Howard (who was only 6-years old at the time) playing Winthrop — looks great. But it was clearly shot on a studio backlot and soundstages. Which is not necessarily a bad thing. It just means that the old movie version of “The Music Man” has a slightly canned feel.
Zadan and Meron’s goal was to try and get “The Music Man” out of that can. Freshen the property up a bit. But how exactly do you do that? By letting a little fresh air into the proceedings.
Toward this end, Craig and Neil tried to find an actual small American town that could double for River City, Iowa. That way, they really could open their TV movie up. Actually stage the show’s big production numbers like “(Ya Got) Trouble,” “76 Trombones,” and “Wells Fargo Wagon” out in the open on a real street. Which would (hopefully) lend an air of authenticity to the whole proceedings.
Sadly, there didn’t seem to be any small towns left in the U.S. that could actually double for 1912 Iowa. But up in Canada, as it turns out, there was a beaut of a place: Milbrook, Ontario. Located just to the east of Toronto, buildings and picturesque places all over this charming old mill town were pressed into service for this production. With the Millbrook Legion Hall becoming River City’s high school gym and the town’s Main Street becoming bedecked with red, white and blue blunting for the film’s Fourth-of-July sequence.
(Of course, another reason that Craig and Neil chose to shot their remake of “The Music Man” way up in Canada is that — thanks to the exchange rate as well as various tax breaks that the Canadian government provide for film and television producers — this allowed Disney and Storyline Entertainment to shave hundreds of thousands of dollars off the production costs of this particular TV movie. But — hey — you didn’t hear that from me. Anyway …)
Then there was the Robert Preston factor to consider. For 45 years now, Preston’s performance as the fast talking con man that serves at the center of this show has been considered so definitive that most performers who end up playing Professor Harold Hill find themselves doing a Preston impression. Even Craig Bierko — the theater vet who just played the Professor in the recent Broadway revival — found himself robbing Robert.
Since Storyline Entertainment’s credo seems to be “Respect your source material, but don’t be afraid to reinvent,” Zadan and Meron wondered how they’d go about creating a new take on this quintessential con man. A Harold Hill for the new millennium, if you will.
With this in mind, they then approached Matthew Broderick (who – at the time – was just wrapping up his highly acclaimed comic turn in “The Producers”) about taking on the role. The way that Craig and Neil saw it: given that Matthew had already portrayed two great con men (I.E. the title character in John Hughes’ 1986 teen comedy, “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off,” as well as J. Pierpont Finch in the 1994 Broadway revival of “How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying”), Harold Hill shouldn’t be too much of a stretch.
What Zadan and Meron didn’t realize was that — within the past three years — Broderick had already been approached to play the title role in “The Music Man.” The folks who had mounted the recent Broadway revival of the Meredith Willson musical had had Matthew at the top of their wish list (along with Steve Martin, Tom Hanks, Alec Baldwin and Scott Bakula) as a possible Harold Hill.
However, since he was already committed to “The Producers,” Broderick wasn’t really in a position back then to play the Professor. Which is why he reluctantly had to take a pass on the project. (As did Martin, Hanks, Baldwin and Bakula. Which is actually how Craig Bierko ended up playing the title role in the Broadway revival of “The Music Man.” Anyway …)
But now — here it was, three years later — and Craig and Neil were offering Matthew another shot at Harold Hill. So Broderick grabbed it. Even though he was more than a little intimidated with the notion of filling Robert Preston’s shoes.
To hear Broderick explain it (in an excerpt from an interview that he did with “Entertainment Tonight” while filming “The Music Man”): “I love Robert Preston so much. So that (was) one of the challenges of this (production). To get that out of my head. Because (Preston’s take on Professor Harold Hill) is one of my favorite performances of all time.”
So how did Matthew go about making this part his own? Broderick explained that he used Robert Preston’s take on the character as a leaping off point … then Matthew took Harold Hill in a whole different direction.
Those familiar with Storyline Entertainment’s TV movie version of “The Music Man” suggest that Broderick really plays up his boyish charm in this part. His Harold Hill isn’t as aggressively charming as Preston’s was. But rather, Matthew’s con man is almost coy. Sweet. Deceptively meek and sincere at times. Which is how this weasel wheedles his way into the hearts of the citizens of River City.
All of them except — of course — Marian the librarian. And — for a while there — Zadan and Meron thought that they’d scored a real publicity coup for their new TV movie production of “The Music Man” by landing both Broderick as well as his real life wife, Sarah Jessica Parker, to play Harold Hill and his love interest, Marian Paroo.
Sadly, this coup didn’t come through. After hemming and hawing for a few weeks, Parker eventually passed on the project. Why for? Well, at the time, Sarah said that the reason that she decided not play Marian was because the part called for a soprano while Parker only sang alto. However — given that shortly after she rejected the role — Sarah announced that she was pregnant … perhaps there were more factors involved here.
Anyway … since they weren’t able to snag Sarah to play Marian, Craig and Neil went with their second choice to play the librarian: Kristen Chenoweth (who’d given such a memorable performance as Lily St. Regis in the TV movie of “Annie”). Rounding out the cast was that old Storyline Entertainment stalwart Victor Garber (who plays Mayor Shinn), “Saturday Night Live”‘s Molly Shannon (who portrays the Mayor’s wife, Eulalie McKenie Shinn) and Broadway vets David Aaron Baker and Debra Monk as Marcellus Washburn and the widow Paroo, respectively.
And since “Annie”‘s director Rob Marshall wasn’t available (at the time, he was tied up helming the movie version of “Chicago”), Zadan and Meron chose Jeff Becker (who’d previously directed “The Beach Boys” mini-series for Storyline Entertainment) to direct “The Music Man.” But they did get one member of the Marshall clan — Kathleen, Rob’s sister (who’s a highly respected Broadway choreographer in her own right) — to handle the choreography for this new TV movie.
So — as you can see — there’s a lot of talent (both above and below the title) involved with ABC’s “The Music Man.” Now the big question: will this Storyline Entertainment production be good enough to make us forget that much beloved movie version of this show that Morton DaCosta directed back in 1962?
Well … if someone at ABC wants to slip me a preview copy of this TV movie prior to its February 16th airing on “The Wonderful World of Disney,” I’ll let you know.
Otherwise, I guess we’re all in the dark ’til next month. Wondering if it’s actually possible for Storyline Entertainment to put together two great new productions of classic Broadway musicals (“Chicago” and “The Music Man”) in a single year’s time.
Normally, I’m not a betting man. But — given Craig and Neil’s track record to date — I’m betting that we’re all in for a treat come February 16th.
So save me a seat on the couch, okay?
MEREDITH WILLSON’S THE MUSIC MAN — Two-time Tony Award-winner Matthew Broderick, Tony Award-winner Kristin Chenoweth, Emmy and Tony Award-nominee Victor Garber, Emmy and Tony Award-winner Debra Monk, Emmy-nominee Molly Shannon and Broadway and film star David Aaron Baker headline a stellar cast in the blockbuster presentation of Meredith Willson’s “The Music Man,” a special three-hour made-for television movie airing on “The Wonderful World of Disney,” SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 16 (7:00-10:00 p.m., ET), on the ABC Television Network. (ABC/RAFY)
General
Seward Johnson bronzes add a surreal, artistic touch to NYC’s Garment District
Greetings from NYC. Nancy and I drove down from New
Hampshire yesterday because we'll be checking out
Disney Consumer Products' annual Holiday Showcase later today.
Anyway … After checking into our hotel (i.e., The Paul.
Which is located down in NYC's NoMad district), we decided to grab some dinner.
Which is how we wound up at the Melt Shop.
Photo by Jim Hill
Which is this restaurant that only sells grilled cheese sandwiches.
This comfort food was delicious, but kind of on the heavy side.
Photo by Jim Hill
Which is why — given that it was a beautiful summer night
— we'd then try and walk off our meals. We started our stroll down by the Empire
State Building
…
Photo by Jim Hill
… and eventually wound up just below Times
Square (right behind where the Waterford Crystal Times Square New
Year's Eve Ball is kept).
Photo by Jim Hill
But you know what we discovered en route? Right in the heart
of Manhattan's Garment District
along Broadway between 36th and 41st? This incredibly cool series of life-like
and life-sized sculptures that Seward
Johnson has created.
Photo by Jim Hill
And — yes — that is Abraham Lincoln (who seems to have
slipped out of WDW's Hall of Presidents when no one was looking and is now
leading tourists around Times Square). These 18 painted
bronze pieces (which were just installed late this past Sunday night / early
Monday morning) range from the surreal to the all-too-real.
Photo by Jim Hill
Some of these pieces look like typical New Yorkers. Like the
business woman planning out her day …
Photo by Jim Hill
… the postman delivering the mail …
Photo by Jim Hill
… the hot dog vendor working at his cart …
Photo by Jim Hill
Photo by Jim Hill
… the street musician playing for tourists …
Photo by Jim Hill
Not to mention the tourists themselves.
Photo by Jim Hill
But right alongside the bronze businessmen …
Photo by Jim Hill
… and the tired grandmother hauling her groceries home …
Photo by Jim Hill
… there were also statues representing people who were
from out-of-town …
Photo by Jim Hill
… or — for that matter — out-of-time.
Photo by Jim Hill
These were the Seward Johnson pieces that genuinely beguiled. Famous impressionist paintings brought to life in three dimensions.
Note the out-of-period water bottle that some tourist left
behind. Photo by Jim Hill
Some of them so lifelike that you actually had to pause for
a moment (especially as day gave way to night in the city) and say to yourself
"Is that one of the bronzes? Or just someone pretending to be one of these
bronzes?"
Mind you, for those of you who aren't big fans of the
impressionists …
Photo by Jim Hill
… there's also an array of American icons. Among them
Marilyn Monroe …
Photo by Jim Hill
… and that farmer couple from Grant Wood's "American
Gothic."
Photo by Jim Hill
But for those of you who know your NYC history, it's hard to
beat that piece which recreates Alfred Eisenstaedt's famous photograph of V-J Day in Times Square.
Photo by Jim Hill
By the way, a 25-foot-tall version of this particular Seward
Johnson piece ( which — FYI — is entitled "Embracing Peace") will actually
be placed in Times Square for a few days on or around August 14th to commemorate the 70th
anniversary of Victory Over Japan Day (V-J Day).
Photo by Jim Hill
By the way, if you'd like to check these Seward Johnson bronzes in
person (which — it should be noted — are part of the part of the Garment
District Alliance's new public art offering) — you'd best schedule a trip to
the City sometime over the next three months. For these pieces will only be on
display now through September 15th.
General
Wondering what you should “Boldly Go” see at the movies next year? The 2015 Licensing Expo offers you some clues
Greeting from the 2015 Licensing Expo, which is being held
at the Mandalay Bay
Convention Center in Las
Vegas.
Photo by Jim Hill
I have to admit that I enjoy covering the Licensing Expo.
Mostly becomes it allows bloggers & entertainment writers like myself to
get a peek over the horizon. Scope out some of the major motion pictures &
TV shows that today's vertically integrated entertainment conglomerates
(Remember when these companies used to be called movie studios?) will be
sending our way over the next two years or so.
Photo by Jim Hill
Take — for example — all of "The Secret Life of
Pets" banners that greeted Expo attendees as they made their way to the
show floor today. I actually got to see some footage from this new Illumination
Entertainment production (which will hit theaters on July 8, 2016) the last time I was in Vegas. Which
was for CinemaCon back in April. And the five or so minutes of film that I viewed
suggested that "The Secret Life of Pets" will be a really funny
animated feature.
Photo by Jim Hill
Mind you, Universal Pictures wanted to make sure that Expo
attendees remembered that there was another Illumination Entertainment production
coming-to-a-theater-near-them before "The Secret Life of Pets" (And
that's "Minions," the "Despicable Me" prequel. Which
premieres at the Annecy International Animated Film Festival next week but
won't be screened stateside 'til July 10th of this year). Which is why they had
three minions who were made entirely out of LEGOS loitering out in the lobby.
Photo by Jim Hill
And Warner Bros. — because they wanted "Batman v
Superman: Dawn of Justice" to start trending on Twitter today — brought
the Batmobile to Las Vegas.
Photo by Jim Hill
Not to mention full-sized macquettes of Batman, Superman and
Wonder Woman. Just so conventioneers could then see what these DC superheroes
would actually look like in this eagerly anticipated, March 25, 2016 release.
Photo by Jim Hill
That's the thing that can sometimes be a wee bit frustrating
about the Licensing Expo. It's all about delayed gratification. You'll come
around a corner and see this 100 foot-long ad for "The Peanuts Movie"
and think "Hey, that looks great. I want to see that Blue Sky Studios production
right now." It's only then that you notice the fine print and realize that
"The Peanuts Movie" doesn't actually open in theaters 'til November
6th of this year.
Photo by Jim Hill
And fan of Blue Sky's "Ice Age" film franchise are in for an even
longer wait. Given that the latest installment in that top grossing series
doesn't arrive in theaters 'til July
15, 2016.
Photo by Jim Hill
Of course, if you're one of those people who needs immediate
gratification when it comes to your entertainment, there was stuff like that to
be found at this year's Licensing Expo. Take — for example — how the WWE
booth was actually shaped like a wrestling ring. Which — I'm guessing — meant
that if the executives of World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. didn't like
the offer that you were making, they were then allowed to toss you out over the
top rope, Royal Rumble-style.
Photo by Jim Hill
I also have to admit that — as a longtime Star Trek fan —
it was cool to see the enormous Starship Enterprise that hung in place over the
CBS booth. Not to mention getting a glimpse of the official Star Trek 50th
Anniversary logo.
Photo by Jim Hill
I was also pleased to see lots of activity in The Jim Henson
Company booth. Which suggests that JHC has actually finally carved out a
post-Muppets identity for itself.
Photo by Jim Hill
Likewise for all of us who were getting a little concerned
about DreamWorks Animation (what with all the layoffs & write-downs &
projects that were put into turnaround or outright cancelled last year), it was
nice to see that booth bustling.
Photo by Jim Hill
Every so often, you'd come across some people who were
promoting a movie that you weren't entirely sure that you actually wanted to
see (EX: "Angry Birds," which Sony Pictures Entertainment / Columbia
Pictures will be releasing to theaters on May 20, 2016). But then you remembered that Clay Kaytis —
who's this hugely talented former Walt Disney Animation Studios animator — is
riding herd on "Angry Birds" with Fergal Reilly. And you'd think
"Well, if Clay's working on 'Angry Birds,' I'm sure this animated feature
will turn out fine."
Photo by Jim Hill
Mind you, there were reminders at this year's Licensing Expo
of great animated features that we're never going to get to see now. I still
can't believe — especially after that brilliant proof-of-concept footage
popped up online last year — that Sony execs decided not to go forward
with production of Genndy Tartakovsky's
"Popeye" movie. But that's the
cruel thing about the entertainment business, folks. It will sometime break
your heart.
Photo by Jim Hill
And make no mistake about this. The Licensing Expo is all
about business. That point was clearly driven home at this year's show when —
as you walked through the doors of the Mandalay
Bay Convention Center
— the first thing that you saw was the Hasbros Booth. Which was this gleaming,
sleek two story-tall affair full of people who were negotiating deals &
signing contracts for all of the would-be summer blockbusters that have already
announced release dates for 2019 & beyond.
Photo by Jim Hill
"But what about The Walt Disney Company?," you
ask. "Weren't they represented on the show floor at this year's Licensing
Expo?" Not really, not. I mean, sure. There were a few companies there hyping
Disney-related products. Take — for example — the Disney Wikkeez people.
Photo by Jim Hill
I'm assuming that some Disney Consumer Products exec is
hoping that Wikkeez will eventually become the new Tsum Tsum. But to be blunt,
these little hard plastic figures don't seem to have the same huggable charm
that those stackable plush do. But I've been wrong before. So let's see what
happens with Disney Wikkeez once they start showing up on the shelves of the
Company's North American retail partners.
Photo by Jim Hill
And speaking of Disney's retail partners … They were
meeting with Mouse House executives behind closed doors one floor down from the
official show floor for this year's Licensing Expo.
Photo by Jim Hill
And the theme for this year's invitation-only Disney shindig? "Timeless
Stories" involving the Disney, Pixar, Marvel & Lucasfilm brands that
would then appeal to "tomorrow's consumer."
Photo by Jim Hill
And just to sort of hammer home the idea that Disney is no
longer the Company which cornered the market when it comes to little girls
(i.e., its Disney Princess and Disney Fairies franchises), check out this
wall-sized Star Wars-related image that DCP put up just outside of one of its
many private meeting rooms. "See?," this carefully crafted photo
screams. "It isn't just little boys who want to wield the Force. Little
girls also want to grow up and be Lords of the Sith."
Photo by Jim Hill
One final, kind-of-ironic note: According to this banner,
Paramount Pictures will be releasing a movie called "Amusement Park"
to theaters sometime in 2017.
Photo by Jim Hill
Well, given all the "Blackfish" -related issues
that have been dogged SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment over the past two years, I'm
just hoping that they'll still be in the amusement park business come 2017.
Your thoughts?
General
It takes more than three circles to craft a Classic version of Mickey Mouse
You know what Mickey Mouse looks like, right? Little guy,
big ears?
Truth be told, Disney's corporate symbol has a lot of
different looks. If Mickey's interacting with Guests at Disneyland
Park (especially this summer, when
the Happiest Place on Earth
is celebrating its 60th anniversary), he looks & dresses like this.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc.
All rights reserved
Or when he's appearing in one of those Emmy Award-winning shorts that Disney
Television Animation has produced (EX: "Bronco Busted," which debuts
on the Disney Channel tonight at 8 p.m. ET / PT), Mickey is drawn in a such a
way that he looks hip, cool, edgy & retro all at the same time.
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights
reserved
Looking ahead to 2017 now, when Disney Junior rolls out "Mickey and the
Roadster Racers," this brand-new animated series will feature a sportier version
of Disney's corporate symbol. One that Mouse House managers hope will persuade
preschool boys to more fully embrace this now 86 year-old character.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
That's what most people don't realize about the Mouse. The
Walt Disney Company deliberately tailors Mickey's look, even his style of
movement, depending on what sort of project / production he's appearing in.
Take — for example — Disney
California Adventure
Park's "World of Color:
Celebrate!" Because Disney's main mouse would be co-hosting this new
nighttime lagoon show with ace emcee Neil Patrick Harris, Eric Goldberg really had
to step up Mickey's game. Which is why this master Disney animator created
several minutes of all-new Mouse animation which then showed that Mickey was
just as skilled a showman as Neil was.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc.
All rights reserved
Better yet, let's take a look at what the folks at Avalanche Studios just went
through as they attempted to create a Classic version of Mickey & Minnie.
One that would then allow this popular pair to become part of Disney Infinity
3.0.
"I won't lie to you. We were under a lot of pressure to
get the look of this particular version of Mickey — he's called Red Pants
Mickey around here — just right," said Jeff Bunker, the VP of Art
Development at Avalanche Studios, during a recent phone interview. "When
we brought Sorcerer Mickey into Disney Infinity 1.0 back in January of 2014,
that one was relatively easy because … Well, everyone knows what Mickey Mouse
looked like when he appeared in 'Fantasia.' "
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"But this time around, we were being asked to design
THE Mickey & Minnie," Bunker continued. "And given that these Classic
Disney characters have been around in various different forms for the better
part of the last century … Well, which look was the right look?"
Which is why Jeff and his team at Avalanche Studios began watching hours &
hours of Mickey Mouse shorts. As they tried to get a handle on which look would
work best for these characters in Disney Infinity 3.0.
Copyright Disney
Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
"And we went all the way back to the very start of Mickey's career. We began
with 'Steamboat Willie' and then watched all of those black & white Mickey shorts
that Walt made back in the late 1920s & early 1930s. From there, we
transitioned to his Technicolor shorts. Which is when Mickey went from being
this pie-eyed, really feisty character to more of a well-behaved leading
man," Bunker recalled. "We then finished out our Mouse marathon by
watching all of those new Mickey shorts that Paul Rudish & his team have
been creating for Disney Television Animation. Those cartoons really recapture
a lot of the spirit and wild slapstick fun that Mickey's early, black &
white shorts had."
But given that the specific assignment that Avalanche Studios had been handed
was to create the most appealing looking, likeable version of Mickey Mouse
possible … In the end, Jeff and his team wound up borrowing bits & pieces
from a lot of different versions of the world's most famous mouse. So that
Classic Mickey would then look & move in a way that best fit the sort of
gameplay which people would soon be able to experience with Disney Infinity
3.0.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"That — in a lot of ways — was actually the toughest
part of the Classic Mickey design project. You have to remember that one of the
key creative conceits of Disney Infinity
is that all the characters which appear in this game are toys," Bunker
stated. "Okay. So they're beautifully detailed, highly stylized toy
versions of beloved Disney, Pixar, Marvel & Lucasfilm characters. But
they're still supposed to be toys. So our Classic versions of Mickey &
Minnie have the same sort of thickness & sturdiness to them that toys have.
So that they'll then be able to fit right in with all of the rest of the
characters that Avalanche Studios had previously designed for Disney Infinity."
And then there was the matter of coming up with just the
right pose for Classic Mickey & Minnie. Which — to hear Jeff tell the
story — involved input from a lot of Disney upper management.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"Everyone within the Company seemed to have an opinion
about how Mickey & Minnie should be posed. More to the point, if you Google
Mickey, you then discover that there are literally thousands of poses out there
for these two. Though — truth be told — a lot of those kind of play off the
way Mickey poses when he's being Disney's corporate symbol," Bunker said.
"But what I was most concerned about was that Mickey's pose had to work
with Minnie's pose. Because we were bringing the Classic versions of these
characters up into Disney Infinity 3.0 at the exact same time. And we wanted to
make sure — especially for those fans who like to put their Disney Infinity
figures on display — that Mickey's pose would then complement Minnie.
Which is why Jeff & the crew at Avalanche Studios
decided — when it came to Classic Mickey & Minnie's pose — that they
should go all the way back to the beginning. Which is why these two Disney icons
are sculpted in such a way that it almost seems as though you're witnessing the
very first time Mickey set eyes on Minnie.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"And what was really great about that was — as soon as
we began showing people within the Company this pose — everyone at Disney
quickly got on board with the idea. I mean, the Classic Mickey that we sculpted
for Disney Infinity 3.0 is clearly a very playful, spunky character. But at the
same time, he's obviously got eyes for Minnie," Bunker concluded. "So
in the end, we were able to come up with Classic versions of these characters
that will work well within the creative confines of Disney Infinity 3.0 but at
the same time please those Disney fans who just collect these figures because
they like the way the Disney Infinity characters look."
So now that this particular design project is over, does
Jeff regret that Mouse House upper management was so hands-on when it came to
making sure that the Classic versions of Mickey & Minnie were specifically
tailored to fit the look & style of gameplay found in Disney Infinity 3.0?
Copyright Lucasfilm / Disney
Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
"To be blunt, we go through this every time we add a new character to the
game. The folks at Lucasfilm were just as hands-on when we were designing the
versions of Darth Vader and Yoda that will also soon be appearing in Disney
Infinity 3.0," Bunker laughed. "So in the end, if the character's
creators AND the fans are happy, then I'm happy."
This article was originally posted on the Huffington Post's Entertainment page on Tuesday, June 9, 2015
-
History10 months ago
The Evolution and History of Mickey’s ToonTown
-
History11 months ago
Unpacking the History of the Pixar Place Hotel
-
History11 months ago
From Birthday Wishes to Toontown Dreams: How Toontown Came to Be
-
Film & Movies8 months ago
How Disney’s “Bambi” led to the creation of Smokey Bear
-
News & Press Releases10 months ago
New Updates and Exclusive Content from Jim Hill Media: Disney, Universal, and More
-
Merchandise8 months ago
Introducing “I Want That Too” – The Ultimate Disney Merchandise Podcast
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment3 months ago
Disney’s Forgotten Halloween Event: The Original Little Monsters on Main Street
-
Film & Movies3 months ago
How “An American Tail” Led to Disney’s “Hocus Pocus”