General
Should Disney have made “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made” instead of “Muppets Most Wanted” ?

As its box office totals continue to trickle in, you just know that there have
to be people back in Burbank
who are disappointed with the way “Muppets Most Wanted” performed
this past weekend. Racking up just an estimated $16.5 million in ticket sales.
Which doesn’t compare all that well with the $29 million that “The
Muppets
” earned over the 2011 Thanksgiving weekend.
So what exactly happened here? Was it just as Kermit & Fozzie musically
foretold in “Muppets Most Wanted” ‘s opening number that ” … the
sequel’s never quite as good” ?
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
To be honest, no. If you talk with industry insiders,
they’ll flat-out tell you that “Muppets Most Wanted” box office
take was seriously undercut by a surprising strong “Mr. Peabody &
Sherman.” Three weekends into its domestic release, this DreamWorks
Animation production sold an estimated $11.7 million worth of tickets. Which
meant that the family-friendly “Mr. Peabody” took an over-sized bite
out of the audience that Disney had hoped would want to go see “Muppets
Most Wanted” instead.
That said, there are also those at the studio who say that
— as soon as Jason Segel made it clear that he didn’t really want to be part
of a follow-up to “The Muppets” — Disney should have had the smarts
to go in another direction with this production. Given that Segel not only
starred in the 2011 Walt Disney Pictures release, Jason also executive-produced
“The Muppets” as well co-wrote that movie’s screenplay with Nicholas
Stoller … Well, Segel’s absence was obviously going to be felt. Especially
since “Muppets Most Wanted” was being sold as a direct sequel to
“The Muppets.”
Jason Segel goes over
“The Muppets” screenplay with Kermit the Frog and Miss
Piggy. Copyright
Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
“So what should have the Mouse made instead of ‘Muppets Most
Wanted?,” you ask. Well, Disney could have always circled back on a script
that Jim Henson himself had always wanted to shoot with Kermit & Co. A
screenplay that Frank Oz said ” … would be a lot of fun to do.” In
fact, as recently as late 2005 / early 2006, Dick Cook — the then-Chairman of Walt
Disney Studios — was still trying to get this Muppet movie made.
“And what project was this?,” you query. A film that was supposedly
so funny that — even in storyboard form — it reportedly caused Jim Henson and
screenwriter Jerry Juhl to giggle uncontrollably: “The Cheapest Muppet
Movie Ever Made.”
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
And what exactly was the storyline of this proposed Muppet movie? To give you the answer to that question, I’m
going to have to turn to that national bestseller, Brian Jay Jones‘ “Jim
Henson: The Biography
” (Ballantine Books, September 2003). And to hear
Jones tell this tale, the origins of “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever
Made” can actually be traced back to a Henson associates staff meeting in
early 1987. Where Oz had been grousing …
… to Jim and Juhl about the growing costs of (many of the
future projects that they hoped to produce) at Henson Associates. If they were
going to make another Muppet film, Oz said testily, they would have to
“figure out a way to do a really low-budget kind of thing.” That was
all Juhl needed. Hunching over his Macintosh computer in his home office in California,
he quickly pounded out a treatment for a film called “The Cheapest Muppet
Movie Ever Made.”
Jerry Juhl and Kermit the
Frog. Copyright The Jim Henson
Company. All rights reserved
So what sort of scenario did Juhl cook up for
“Cheapest” ? Borrowing a page from Jim’s own life during this point
in the history of Henson Associates, as this film is getting underway, Kermit
is far too busy to take on any additional behind-the-scenes responsibilities on
the next Muppet movie. Gonzo — who has always dreamed of directing — then
offers to take over production of this motion picture. Kermit reluctantly
agrees but does seem pleased that all he’ll have to do on this Muppet movie is
appear in it. Rather than produce and then have to coax emotionally overwrought
lady pigs out of their trailers.
So Gonzo goes off and — because his contract says that he
has now creative control over this entire project — completely rewrites the
script for the next Muppet movie. The film that he now wants to shoot is called
“Into the Jaws of the Demons of Death.” Which — to hear Jerry Juhl
describe the proposed storyline of the motion picture masterpiece that Gonzo
wants to make — has …
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc.
All rights reserved
… this cheesy, terrible plot that made absolutely no sense
whatsoever about something being stolen that led to a chase around the world.
Let’s Brian Jay Jones pick up “Cheapest” plotline
from this point in the story. Gonzo now asks all of the friends to come to the
Muppet Studios screening room to see all of the footage that he’s shot so far:
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights
reserved
In his enthusiasm, Gonzo spends his entire budget on an
impressive opening credits sequence, then has no money left for the rest of the
film, As the movie proceeds, the film quality gets worse and worse, eventually
eroding into black-and-white Super 8 film, then a slide show, and finally just
storyboards — until Gonzo sells out to corporate sponsors and finishes the
movie in a beautiful, high-definition, widescreen format.
Jim was delighted with the treatment, and put Juhl to work
writing a full script, which he turned in as Jim was wrapping up “A Muppet
Family Christmas” in Ontario.
Jim, Juhl and Oz passed the script back and forth, and even Oz — always
prickly about the treatment of the characters — thought it was a exciting
project. “It’s going to be the kind of movie the audience wants the Muppets to do,” he told
Jim. “Just a little crazy and a whole lot of fun.”
As it was written, “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever
Made” actually wouldn’t be cheap to make — Juhl’s script called for
erupting volcanoes and exploding islands, and for Meryl Streep to play Miss
Piggy’s stand-in — but the idea was funny and Jim thought he could manage
things on a budget of $8 million.
(L to R) A very young Frank Oz,
Jim Henson and Jerry Juhl wrestling with Big V,
the Muppet monster made famous
in the “Glow Worm” skit which debuted on
“The Ed Sullivan
Show” back in 1964. Copyright The Jim Henson
Company. All rights reserved
And Henson was seriously about trying to keep “The
Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made” ‘s production costs down. As Jones
recounts, in late 1988, Jim …
… visited with Industrial Light and Magic, George Lucas‘s
groundbreaking special effects company, to discuss special effects for ‘The
Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made,’ which he was determined to put into
production in 1989.
Jim Henson and George Lucas. Copyright The Jim Henson
Company.
All rights reserved
And even as late as Spring of 1990 — when most of Jim’s time, energy and
attention were directed toward trying to wrap up The Walt Disney Company’s
protracted negotiations to acquire Henson Associates for an estimated $150
million — he was still talking up “Cheapest.” Again from Brian Jay
Jones’ best-selling book:
Jim made the short flight from Burbank
up to Sacramento, then drove up the
coastline to visit Jerry Juhl at his home a hundred miles north of San
Francisco. The two walked and talked among the giant
redwoods for a while, then returned to Juhl’s home office to discuss “The
Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made,” which Jim was still determined to make
once the Disney deal was complete. It was a project that the two of them loved
to talk about — and Jim would spread the storyboards out on the floor of
Juhl’s office where, in no time, the two of them would be giggling
uncontrollably as they tossed around one idea after another.
Jim Henson and Jerry Juhl with the cast of “Fraggle Rock.”
Copyright The Jim
Henson Company. All rights reserved
But then on May 16, 1990,
Jim Henson died. And all of his grand plans for the Muppets and what he &
his talented team were going to do at Disney slowly fell apart. In fact, by
December of that same year, relations had gotten so strained between the Henson
family & Mickey’s attorneys that The Walt Disney Company’s acquisition of
Henson Associates was abruptly called off.
And in its place … Well, this weird sort of deal was then cobbled together.
One that would allow the already completed “Jim Henson Presents Muppet
Vision 3D” to begin being shown at Disney-MGM Studio theme park starting
in May of 1991. Not to mention granting Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
distribution rights for much of the Jim Henson Company’s film library.
Copyright Disney
Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
And speaking of films … Then-Disney CEO Michael Eisner was determined that
Walt Disney Pictures would start distributing new Muppet movies. And the
sooner, the better. But the only problem was
— when the script for “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever
Produced” landed on his desk — Eisner saw this proposed film as too much
of a inside joke. Something that people who actually lived & worked in Hollywood
would get and enjoy. But as for the rest of the country … Well, Michael felt
that Jim & Jerry’s good-natured ribbing of the entertainment industry would
just confuse all of those folks out there in flyover country.
So setting aside the screenplay that he’d written for
“Cheapest,” Juhl then crafted two scripts that met with Eisner’s
approval: 1992’s “The Muppet Christmas Carol
” and 1996’s “Muppet Treasure Island
.” Which placed Miss Piggy & pals in the
context of two well-known classic stories that most moviegoers already knew.
Which would — in theory, anyway — then make it that much easier to sell these
two new Muppet movies to audiences around the world.
Copyright Disney
Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
Mind you, about this same time, Frank Oz began cutting back on his involvement
in Muppet-related projects. Mostly this was because Oz’s career as a film
director really began taking off in the late 1980s / early 1990s. Which meant
that he then had less & less time to ” … wiggle the dollies.”
(i.e., this was Jim & Frank’s deliberately dismissive way of describing the
work that they did with the Muppets. These two truly talented men felt that —
if they avoided being precious about the
puppets that they worked with — that would then make it that much easier for
Henson & Oz to just concentrate on doing good work).
Which then led to situations like what happened on
“Muppet Treasure Island.” Because Frank was so busy shooting
“The Indian in the Cupboard
” while the Muppet version of this Robert
Louis Stevenson story was being filmed, Kevin Clash performed Oz’s characters (i.e.,
Squire Trelawney [Fozzie Bear], Mr. Arrow [Sam Eagle] and Benjamina Gunn [Miss
Piggy]) on set, and Oz then came in after-the-fact and looped those characters’
dialogue during post-production.
Copyright Disney
Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
There have also been whispers that — on the heels of the
July 1999 release of “Muppets from Space
” — Frank wasn’t entirely
happy with the direction that the Jim Henson Company was taking with the
characters. While Oz has never talked publicly about the matter, it is worth
noting that Frank’s last known performance as Miss Piggy was back on January 14, 2002. When he appeared alongside
Steve Whitmire’s Kermit the Frog as part of the 50th anniversary celebration of
NBC‘s Today.
Now where this gets interesting is that — in February of
2004 — The Walt Disney Company signed a binding purchasing agreement with The
Jim Henson Company which would then allow the Mouse to acquire the Muppets as
well as the Bear in the Big Blue House characters. And as Disney’s lawyers dug
down in Henson’s files during the discovery phase of this acquisition, what did
they discover? Jerry Juhl’s original screenplay for “The Cheapest Muppet
Movie Ever Made.”
(L to R) Bob Iger, Michael Eisner and Dick Cook at the November 2004 premiere
of Pixar’s “The Incredibles.” Copyright
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
All rights reserved
This script & its storyboards eventually wound up on
Dick Cook’s desk. And the then-Chairman of Walt Disney Studios just loved the
idea of a movie where — as its budget continues to shrink — Gonzo and his
“Into the Jaws of the Demons of Death” production team were
eventually forced to use a shot of the exact same street corner for every city
in the world.
That said, Cook knew that the Muppets had basically been out of the spotlight
for five years at this point. Which meant that it would take something really
special to reinvigorate this film franchise, get people excited about the idea
of seeing a Muppet movie again. Which is why Dick reportedly gave Frank a call
and asked him to come by Disney Studios so that they could then discuss the
idea of Oz directing “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made.”
Frank Oz behind the camera.
And Cook couldn’t have picked a better project to try and lure Oz back into the
Muppet fold. For as recently as February of 2000, Frank had still been talking
with great enthusiasm about “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made.” In
a four part interview with Ken Plume for Film Force, Oz insisted that the
reason …
… I want to do the next Muppet movie (is) because I’m
excited about a particular idea, and the idea is something that Jim and Jerry
Juhl and I thought of 15 years ago.
(L to R) Alex Rockwell, Jim Henson and Frank Oz on
the set of Muppet Vision 3D.
Copyright The Jim Henson Company. All rights
reserved
Now just to be clear here: This meeting reportedly happened
in the late Summer / early Fall of 2005 just as Michael Eisner was stepping
down as the head of The Walt Disney Company. And given that Bob Iger — the
Company’s incoming president and chief executive officer — reportedly wasn’t
quite the Muppet enthusiast that Michael Eisner was … Well, Cook knew that if
he was going to convince Iger to greenlight production of a new Muppet movie,
he’d need a hook. Which is why it was crucial to convince Oz to come direct
“Cheapest.”
And “Cheapest” had supposedly been on Frank’s mind. What with Jerry
Juhl’s passing on September 26, 2005, it
seemed that more & more of his good friends — the very people who had
taken a chance on this 17 year-old kid back in the early 1960s and helped Oz
get his start in the entertainment industry — were slipping away. So if Frank
could actually finally get “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made” …
Well, that could then be his way of honoring the memory of Jim & Jerry.
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights
reserved
The only problem was that — as Dick & Frank began to
talk about theis project — it quickly became apparent that they just couldn’t
see eye-to-eye on this proposed film’s budget. The story that I’ve always been
told is that Cook really did want to make the cheapest Muppet movie ever made.
And the amount of money that he supposedly offered Oz to produce & direct
this motion picture was miniscule.
Whereas Oz … Because he knew Juhl’s script backwards & forwards, Frank
understood that there were gags in this screenplay which hinged on really expensive
things. Like volcanoes suddenly erupting on tranquil islands. And in an
infamous exchange with Disney’s studio chief, Oz reportedly turned to Cook and
said “Do you know how much money you have to spend in order to make
something look cheap?”
Frank Oz on set
With the hope that Frank might eventually find a way to
drive the projected production costs of “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever
Made” down, Cook asked Oz to meet with the studio’s special effects
department and continue to develop Juhl’s screenplay. But about this same time
in 2006, Jason Segel came a-knocking with his own pitch for a brand-new Muppet
movie. One that aimed to revive this franchise by reaching back to the style
& tone of the first three Muppet movies as well as the old “Muppet
Show” TV series.
In the end, given that what Segel was proposing was
basically a reboot of the Muppets (which was really more in line with what The Walt
Disney Company was looking for back then. Given that there was an entire
generation of consumers out there who didn’t know Kermit & Co. / weren’t
emotionally connected with these characters) and given that Oz & Cook
couldn’t come to terms over “Cheapest” ‘s budget, Dick eventually
opted to go with Jason’s proposal. And Frank … After he departed Disney, Oz
eventually went on to direct 2007’s “Death at a Funeral
.”
Frank Oz directs Peter
Dinklage on the set of “Death at a Funeral.” Copyright
2007
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. All rights reserved
Now where this story gets kind of confusing is that — even though Walt Disney
Studios was now committed to shooting Segel’s version of a Muppet revival movie
— Cook kept referring to this project as “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made.”
Dick even stood onstage at the inaugural D23 EXPO back in September of 2009 and
used that very same title in front of the Disney faithful. Even though he knew
that the film that Jason wanted to make had nothing to do with the screenplay
that Jerry had written back in 1987.
Look, it’s not like The Jim Henson Company & The Walt
Disney Company doesn’t have other unproduced Muppet screenplays lying around.
Google “The Muppets Haunted Hotel,” “Muppets Haunted Movie”
& “Muppets Time Travel” (Or — for that matter — “Muppets
in Space” rather than “Muppets from Space”) and you’ll see what
I mean.
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights
reserved
But even so, at a time when the Studio was unsure that the
movie-going public would actually embrace a Jason Segel-free sequel to 2010’s
“The Muppets,” one has to wonder if — as Disney execs were reviewing
their options back then — someone there went riffling through the files. And
given that studio execs are always trying to keep the production costs down on
sequels because the old Hollywood rule-of-thumb is that
follow-up films only gross 4/5th to 2/3rds of what the original motion picture
made … Well, a script entitled “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever
Made” would have been very, very tempting.
Anyway … That’s the story as it was told to me by several Disney & Muppet
insiders. Plus the info I pulled out of Brian Jay Jones’ award-winning “Jim Henson: The Biography
.” So what do you think? Does “The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever
Made” actually sound like something that you’d have paid to see?
The Muppets onstage at the D23 EXPO back in
September of 2009.
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
Your thoughts?
General
Seward Johnson bronzes add a surreal, artistic touch to NYC’s Garment District

Greetings from NYC. Nancy and I drove down from New
Hampshire yesterday because we'll be checking out
Disney Consumer Products' annual Holiday Showcase later today.
Anyway … After checking into our hotel (i.e., The Paul.
Which is located down in NYC's NoMad district), we decided to grab some dinner.
Which is how we wound up at the Melt Shop.
Photo by Jim Hill
Which is this restaurant that only sells grilled cheese sandwiches.
This comfort food was delicious, but kind of on the heavy side.
Photo by Jim Hill
Which is why — given that it was a beautiful summer night
— we'd then try and walk off our meals. We started our stroll down by the Empire
State Building
…
Photo by Jim Hill
… and eventually wound up just below Times
Square (right behind where the Waterford Crystal Times Square New
Year's Eve Ball is kept).
Photo by Jim Hill
But you know what we discovered en route? Right in the heart
of Manhattan's Garment District
along Broadway between 36th and 41st? This incredibly cool series of life-like
and life-sized sculptures that Seward
Johnson has created.
Photo by Jim Hill
And — yes — that is Abraham Lincoln (who seems to have
slipped out of WDW's Hall of Presidents when no one was looking and is now
leading tourists around Times Square). These 18 painted
bronze pieces (which were just installed late this past Sunday night / early
Monday morning) range from the surreal to the all-too-real.
Photo by Jim Hill
Some of these pieces look like typical New Yorkers. Like the
business woman planning out her day …
Photo by Jim Hill
… the postman delivering the mail …
Photo by Jim Hill
… the hot dog vendor working at his cart …
Photo by Jim Hill
Photo by Jim Hill
… the street musician playing for tourists …
Photo by Jim Hill
Not to mention the tourists themselves.
Photo by Jim Hill
But right alongside the bronze businessmen …
Photo by Jim Hill
… and the tired grandmother hauling her groceries home …
Photo by Jim Hill
… there were also statues representing people who were
from out-of-town …
Photo by Jim Hill
… or — for that matter — out-of-time.
Photo by Jim Hill
These were the Seward Johnson pieces that genuinely beguiled. Famous impressionist paintings brought to life in three dimensions.
Note the out-of-period water bottle that some tourist left
behind. Photo by Jim Hill
Some of them so lifelike that you actually had to pause for
a moment (especially as day gave way to night in the city) and say to yourself
"Is that one of the bronzes? Or just someone pretending to be one of these
bronzes?"
Mind you, for those of you who aren't big fans of the
impressionists …
Photo by Jim Hill
… there's also an array of American icons. Among them
Marilyn Monroe …
Photo by Jim Hill
… and that farmer couple from Grant Wood's "American
Gothic."
Photo by Jim Hill
But for those of you who know your NYC history, it's hard to
beat that piece which recreates Alfred Eisenstaedt's famous photograph of V-J Day in Times Square.
Photo by Jim Hill
By the way, a 25-foot-tall version of this particular Seward
Johnson piece ( which — FYI — is entitled "Embracing Peace") will actually
be placed in Times Square for a few days on or around August 14th to commemorate the 70th
anniversary of Victory Over Japan Day (V-J Day).
Photo by Jim Hill
By the way, if you'd like to check these Seward Johnson bronzes in
person (which — it should be noted — are part of the part of the Garment
District Alliance's new public art offering) — you'd best schedule a trip to
the City sometime over the next three months. For these pieces will only be on
display now through September 15th.
General
Wondering what you should “Boldly Go” see at the movies next year? The 2015 Licensing Expo offers you some clues

Greeting from the 2015 Licensing Expo, which is being held
at the Mandalay Bay
Convention Center in Las
Vegas.
Photo by Jim Hill
I have to admit that I enjoy covering the Licensing Expo.
Mostly becomes it allows bloggers & entertainment writers like myself to
get a peek over the horizon. Scope out some of the major motion pictures &
TV shows that today's vertically integrated entertainment conglomerates
(Remember when these companies used to be called movie studios?) will be
sending our way over the next two years or so.
Photo by Jim Hill
Take — for example — all of "The Secret Life of
Pets" banners that greeted Expo attendees as they made their way to the
show floor today. I actually got to see some footage from this new Illumination
Entertainment production (which will hit theaters on July 8, 2016) the last time I was in Vegas. Which
was for CinemaCon back in April. And the five or so minutes of film that I viewed
suggested that "The Secret Life of Pets" will be a really funny
animated feature.
Photo by Jim Hill
Mind you, Universal Pictures wanted to make sure that Expo
attendees remembered that there was another Illumination Entertainment production
coming-to-a-theater-near-them before "The Secret Life of Pets" (And
that's "Minions," the "Despicable Me" prequel. Which
premieres at the Annecy International Animated Film Festival next week but
won't be screened stateside 'til July 10th of this year). Which is why they had
three minions who were made entirely out of LEGOS loitering out in the lobby.
Photo by Jim Hill
And Warner Bros. — because they wanted "Batman v
Superman: Dawn of Justice" to start trending on Twitter today — brought
the Batmobile to Las Vegas.
Photo by Jim Hill
Not to mention full-sized macquettes of Batman, Superman and
Wonder Woman. Just so conventioneers could then see what these DC superheroes
would actually look like in this eagerly anticipated, March 25, 2016 release.
Photo by Jim Hill
That's the thing that can sometimes be a wee bit frustrating
about the Licensing Expo. It's all about delayed gratification. You'll come
around a corner and see this 100 foot-long ad for "The Peanuts Movie"
and think "Hey, that looks great. I want to see that Blue Sky Studios production
right now." It's only then that you notice the fine print and realize that
"The Peanuts Movie" doesn't actually open in theaters 'til November
6th of this year.
Photo by Jim Hill
And fan of Blue Sky's "Ice Age" film franchise are in for an even
longer wait. Given that the latest installment in that top grossing series
doesn't arrive in theaters 'til July
15, 2016.
Photo by Jim Hill
Of course, if you're one of those people who needs immediate
gratification when it comes to your entertainment, there was stuff like that to
be found at this year's Licensing Expo. Take — for example — how the WWE
booth was actually shaped like a wrestling ring. Which — I'm guessing — meant
that if the executives of World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. didn't like
the offer that you were making, they were then allowed to toss you out over the
top rope, Royal Rumble-style.
Photo by Jim Hill
I also have to admit that — as a longtime Star Trek fan —
it was cool to see the enormous Starship Enterprise that hung in place over the
CBS booth. Not to mention getting a glimpse of the official Star Trek 50th
Anniversary logo.
Photo by Jim Hill
I was also pleased to see lots of activity in The Jim Henson
Company booth. Which suggests that JHC has actually finally carved out a
post-Muppets identity for itself.
Photo by Jim Hill
Likewise for all of us who were getting a little concerned
about DreamWorks Animation (what with all the layoffs & write-downs &
projects that were put into turnaround or outright cancelled last year), it was
nice to see that booth bustling.
Photo by Jim Hill
Every so often, you'd come across some people who were
promoting a movie that you weren't entirely sure that you actually wanted to
see (EX: "Angry Birds," which Sony Pictures Entertainment / Columbia
Pictures will be releasing to theaters on May 20, 2016). But then you remembered that Clay Kaytis —
who's this hugely talented former Walt Disney Animation Studios animator — is
riding herd on "Angry Birds" with Fergal Reilly. And you'd think
"Well, if Clay's working on 'Angry Birds,' I'm sure this animated feature
will turn out fine."
Photo by Jim Hill
Mind you, there were reminders at this year's Licensing Expo
of great animated features that we're never going to get to see now. I still
can't believe — especially after that brilliant proof-of-concept footage
popped up online last year — that Sony execs decided not to go forward
with production of Genndy Tartakovsky's
"Popeye" movie. But that's the
cruel thing about the entertainment business, folks. It will sometime break
your heart.
Photo by Jim Hill
And make no mistake about this. The Licensing Expo is all
about business. That point was clearly driven home at this year's show when —
as you walked through the doors of the Mandalay
Bay Convention Center
— the first thing that you saw was the Hasbros Booth. Which was this gleaming,
sleek two story-tall affair full of people who were negotiating deals &
signing contracts for all of the would-be summer blockbusters that have already
announced release dates for 2019 & beyond.
Photo by Jim Hill
"But what about The Walt Disney Company?," you
ask. "Weren't they represented on the show floor at this year's Licensing
Expo?" Not really, not. I mean, sure. There were a few companies there hyping
Disney-related products. Take — for example — the Disney Wikkeez people.
Photo by Jim Hill
I'm assuming that some Disney Consumer Products exec is
hoping that Wikkeez will eventually become the new Tsum Tsum. But to be blunt,
these little hard plastic figures don't seem to have the same huggable charm
that those stackable plush do. But I've been wrong before. So let's see what
happens with Disney Wikkeez once they start showing up on the shelves of the
Company's North American retail partners.
Photo by Jim Hill
And speaking of Disney's retail partners … They were
meeting with Mouse House executives behind closed doors one floor down from the
official show floor for this year's Licensing Expo.
Photo by Jim Hill
And the theme for this year's invitation-only Disney shindig? "Timeless
Stories" involving the Disney, Pixar, Marvel & Lucasfilm brands that
would then appeal to "tomorrow's consumer."
Photo by Jim Hill
And just to sort of hammer home the idea that Disney is no
longer the Company which cornered the market when it comes to little girls
(i.e., its Disney Princess and Disney Fairies franchises), check out this
wall-sized Star Wars-related image that DCP put up just outside of one of its
many private meeting rooms. "See?," this carefully crafted photo
screams. "It isn't just little boys who want to wield the Force. Little
girls also want to grow up and be Lords of the Sith."
Photo by Jim Hill
One final, kind-of-ironic note: According to this banner,
Paramount Pictures will be releasing a movie called "Amusement Park"
to theaters sometime in 2017.
Photo by Jim Hill
Well, given all the "Blackfish" -related issues
that have been dogged SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment over the past two years, I'm
just hoping that they'll still be in the amusement park business come 2017.
Your thoughts?
General
It takes more than three circles to craft a Classic version of Mickey Mouse

You know what Mickey Mouse looks like, right? Little guy,
big ears?
Truth be told, Disney's corporate symbol has a lot of
different looks. If Mickey's interacting with Guests at Disneyland
Park (especially this summer, when
the Happiest Place on Earth
is celebrating its 60th anniversary), he looks & dresses like this.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc.
All rights reserved
Or when he's appearing in one of those Emmy Award-winning shorts that Disney
Television Animation has produced (EX: "Bronco Busted," which debuts
on the Disney Channel tonight at 8 p.m. ET / PT), Mickey is drawn in a such a
way that he looks hip, cool, edgy & retro all at the same time.
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights
reserved
Looking ahead to 2017 now, when Disney Junior rolls out "Mickey and the
Roadster Racers," this brand-new animated series will feature a sportier version
of Disney's corporate symbol. One that Mouse House managers hope will persuade
preschool boys to more fully embrace this now 86 year-old character.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
That's what most people don't realize about the Mouse. The
Walt Disney Company deliberately tailors Mickey's look, even his style of
movement, depending on what sort of project / production he's appearing in.
Take — for example — Disney
California Adventure
Park's "World of Color:
Celebrate!" Because Disney's main mouse would be co-hosting this new
nighttime lagoon show with ace emcee Neil Patrick Harris, Eric Goldberg really had
to step up Mickey's game. Which is why this master Disney animator created
several minutes of all-new Mouse animation which then showed that Mickey was
just as skilled a showman as Neil was.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc.
All rights reserved
Better yet, let's take a look at what the folks at Avalanche Studios just went
through as they attempted to create a Classic version of Mickey & Minnie.
One that would then allow this popular pair to become part of Disney Infinity
3.0.
"I won't lie to you. We were under a lot of pressure to
get the look of this particular version of Mickey — he's called Red Pants
Mickey around here — just right," said Jeff Bunker, the VP of Art
Development at Avalanche Studios, during a recent phone interview. "When
we brought Sorcerer Mickey into Disney Infinity 1.0 back in January of 2014,
that one was relatively easy because … Well, everyone knows what Mickey Mouse
looked like when he appeared in 'Fantasia.' "
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"But this time around, we were being asked to design
THE Mickey & Minnie," Bunker continued. "And given that these Classic
Disney characters have been around in various different forms for the better
part of the last century … Well, which look was the right look?"
Which is why Jeff and his team at Avalanche Studios began watching hours &
hours of Mickey Mouse shorts. As they tried to get a handle on which look would
work best for these characters in Disney Infinity 3.0.
Copyright Disney
Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
"And we went all the way back to the very start of Mickey's career. We began
with 'Steamboat Willie' and then watched all of those black & white Mickey shorts
that Walt made back in the late 1920s & early 1930s. From there, we
transitioned to his Technicolor shorts. Which is when Mickey went from being
this pie-eyed, really feisty character to more of a well-behaved leading
man," Bunker recalled. "We then finished out our Mouse marathon by
watching all of those new Mickey shorts that Paul Rudish & his team have
been creating for Disney Television Animation. Those cartoons really recapture
a lot of the spirit and wild slapstick fun that Mickey's early, black &
white shorts had."
But given that the specific assignment that Avalanche Studios had been handed
was to create the most appealing looking, likeable version of Mickey Mouse
possible … In the end, Jeff and his team wound up borrowing bits & pieces
from a lot of different versions of the world's most famous mouse. So that
Classic Mickey would then look & move in a way that best fit the sort of
gameplay which people would soon be able to experience with Disney Infinity
3.0.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"That — in a lot of ways — was actually the toughest
part of the Classic Mickey design project. You have to remember that one of the
key creative conceits of Disney Infinity
is that all the characters which appear in this game are toys," Bunker
stated. "Okay. So they're beautifully detailed, highly stylized toy
versions of beloved Disney, Pixar, Marvel & Lucasfilm characters. But
they're still supposed to be toys. So our Classic versions of Mickey &
Minnie have the same sort of thickness & sturdiness to them that toys have.
So that they'll then be able to fit right in with all of the rest of the
characters that Avalanche Studios had previously designed for Disney Infinity."
And then there was the matter of coming up with just the
right pose for Classic Mickey & Minnie. Which — to hear Jeff tell the
story — involved input from a lot of Disney upper management.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"Everyone within the Company seemed to have an opinion
about how Mickey & Minnie should be posed. More to the point, if you Google
Mickey, you then discover that there are literally thousands of poses out there
for these two. Though — truth be told — a lot of those kind of play off the
way Mickey poses when he's being Disney's corporate symbol," Bunker said.
"But what I was most concerned about was that Mickey's pose had to work
with Minnie's pose. Because we were bringing the Classic versions of these
characters up into Disney Infinity 3.0 at the exact same time. And we wanted to
make sure — especially for those fans who like to put their Disney Infinity
figures on display — that Mickey's pose would then complement Minnie.
Which is why Jeff & the crew at Avalanche Studios
decided — when it came to Classic Mickey & Minnie's pose — that they
should go all the way back to the beginning. Which is why these two Disney icons
are sculpted in such a way that it almost seems as though you're witnessing the
very first time Mickey set eyes on Minnie.
Copyright Disney Enterprises,
Inc. All rights reserved
"And what was really great about that was — as soon as
we began showing people within the Company this pose — everyone at Disney
quickly got on board with the idea. I mean, the Classic Mickey that we sculpted
for Disney Infinity 3.0 is clearly a very playful, spunky character. But at the
same time, he's obviously got eyes for Minnie," Bunker concluded. "So
in the end, we were able to come up with Classic versions of these characters
that will work well within the creative confines of Disney Infinity 3.0 but at
the same time please those Disney fans who just collect these figures because
they like the way the Disney Infinity characters look."
So now that this particular design project is over, does
Jeff regret that Mouse House upper management was so hands-on when it came to
making sure that the Classic versions of Mickey & Minnie were specifically
tailored to fit the look & style of gameplay found in Disney Infinity 3.0?
Copyright Lucasfilm / Disney
Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
"To be blunt, we go through this every time we add a new character to the
game. The folks at Lucasfilm were just as hands-on when we were designing the
versions of Darth Vader and Yoda that will also soon be appearing in Disney
Infinity 3.0," Bunker laughed. "So in the end, if the character's
creators AND the fans are happy, then I'm happy."
This article was originally posted on the Huffington Post's Entertainment page on Tuesday, June 9, 2015
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment7 months ago
How Did We Get “Aladdin’s Oasis” at Disneyland?
-
History6 months ago
31 Long-Gone Rides, Shows & Attractions at Disney-MGM (Hollywood Studios)
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment7 months ago
Get Your Hands Dirty with Disney-MGM Studios “Star of the Day” Program
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment10 months ago
Abraham Lincoln is Here to Stay – Walt’s Disneyland Attraction That “Can’t” Be Replaced
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment12 months ago
The Road to Cars Land – Part One
-
Film & Movies10 months ago
“Build It” – How the Swiss Family Treehouse Ended up in Disneyland
-
Film & Movies10 months ago
Will “Metro” – that “Cars” Spin-Off Which Disney Developed – Ever Get Made?
-
News & Press Releases3 months ago
Disney Will Bring D23: The Ultimate Disney Fan Event to Anaheim, California in August 2024