Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment
Did Disney execs unintentionally slip “Philharmagic” a Mickey?
With three tepid reviews of the Magic Kingdom’s newest attraction in hand, Jim Hill wonders: Did Disney accidentally debut its newest 3D film in the wrong theater? And will this prevent “Philharmagic” from becoming the corporation’s next franchisable theme park attraction?

Sometimes I hate my job.
What do I mean by that? Well … I know that there are a lot of very nice people at Walt Disney Imagineering and Walt Disney Feature Animation who worked very hard on “Mickey’s Philharmagic.” Truly talented folks who labored for months to turn classic Disney characters (toons that — up until now — had only been done in the traditional 2D format) into believable 3D CG creations.
But — in the end — was all of their hard work worth it?
Well … Er … Um …
*Sigh*
No.
At least that’s the indication I’ve gotten. Based on the initial feedback that I’ve received from several WDW cast members and annual passholders who attended last week’s previews of this new Fantasyland attraction, “Mickey’s Philharmagic” is a near miss.
Not a flop, mind you. Nor a debacle or a disaster. Based on what I’ve heard over the past few days, the Magic Kingdom’s new 3D extravaganza sounds like it has some very nice moments. And there’s some CG in this film (particularly the work that was done with the computer-generated Donald Duck and Lumiere from “Beauty and the Beast”) that supposedly will put Pixar to shame.
And the post-show store that you’re funneled into after seeing “Mickey’s Philharmagic” is said to be very nice as well.
But … that’s not a very enthusiastic recommendation, is it? Well — you see — that’s my problem. That’s the sort of language that kept popping up in all the “Philharmagic” reviews that I received this weekend. Not “Great.” Not “Spectacular.” But “nice” and “okay.”
Which is what leads me to believe that the Magic Kingdom’s newest attraction may not be all that magical.
Don’t believe me? Okay. Then let’s get this news straight from the horse’s mouth. Here’s what Seabiscuit had to say in his note:
I had a chance to see Mickey’s (even though Donald is the real star here) Philharmagic the other day. After seeing “Finding Nemo,” I was truly disappointed in the computer animation. Also no pre-show, and standard “4-D” effects (spraying water again). The theater does have a wonderful “expanding” effect, and the flying scenes are very cool. Get out and see it when you can. Even if it’s only a “C” attraction.
Mickey and Donald really look like they went through the budget axe.
Which isn’t all that different from what my Friend Flicka had to say:
Saw Mickey’s Philimagic at a cast preview and it is…nice. It really is Donald’s show and the human characters (Aladdin) look like George Pal Puppetoons. Cast member reaction is divided: Those who love it and those who think it is too soft. (It was designed not to have “scary” moments like snakes popping out or a bug’s stinger in your back so that little kids could enjoy it.)
I saw it twice and would see it again. However, you can tell where they were saving nickels and dimes in the auditorium and pre-show. Sorry to see Mickey still a supporting character in an attraction named after him but Donald is a more flexible character in terms of “roughing him up” as animators discovered nearly fifty years ago.
[The show] seemed very respectful to the source material…Lion King, Little Mermaid, etc….and you really have to see it more than once to catch all the little bits.
Some of the 3-D effects are good but it seemed they missed the boat on others.
Which (surprise, surprise) quite similar to what Mr. Ed had to say about this new Fantasyland show:
Warning !! Mr. Ed is quite the talkative Palomino. So there are some mild spoilers ahead. If you’d prefer that “Mickey’s Philharmagic” be a complete surprise to you (whenever it is that you actually finally get around to seeing this new Disney World show), then I suggest that you stop reading now. Or — at the very least — skip ahead of this indented section.
Good first scene. (They must know that CG Mickey looks like sh*t because he appears for less than 15 seconds in the whole show, and almost always from the back and 50 feet away. When he is seen from the front, they give him a really funny little action to do).
CG Donald is fan-freaking-tastic. Not just aesthetically, but they’re braver with CG Donald. He’s everything that made Don the coolest character of them all before, but more. Like Tex Avery more. It’s very, very faithful to the Jack Hanna/Bill Justice Don, but infused with some badass Chuck Jones.
“Be Our Guest” is lame, but Lumiere is so freaking well built and animated, no one cares.
The Brooms from “Fantasia” scene is my favorite. It’s everything I’ve been waiting for in an attraction. True cartoon comedia.
“Part of Your World” is good too. Though kids (in half of the four shows I saw) thought Flounder was “Nemo!” They figured out how to fix Ariel, and it was to turn her into Fiona [The princess from “Shrek”]. Swear to God, they rendered Fiona’s face to fix Ariel. It works. Her hair — however — looks like a placenta full of wet weasels.
But Ariel has a great, great, great moment with Don. So all is forgiven.
“I Just Can’t Wait to Be King” is okay. The CG is good if uninspired. But the 2d stuff they stuffed in looks great, just underutilized. The CG Zazu is marvelous.
Peter Pan is a close second favorite. Beautiful and funny as hell!!!!!!!
“A Whole New World” is crazy lame. Other than immensely poorly boarded and paced, the CG Aladdin and Jasmine look like those gnomes [that Lord] Farquaad kicked out of Duloc [in “Shrek”].
The finale is ok. The Donald butt in the back of the theater has great movement but placed so poorly, like 4 people saw it. Didn’t we learn anything with “Muppetvision”? Oh, yeah. All those people were fired.
[The post-show “Mickey’s Philharmagic”] shop was beautiful – natch. Of course, they get the good design.
[WDW annual] passholders [who attended Saturday’s preview] liked the show. But remember how those guys talked themselves into loving “Mission: Space”? [Well, it’s the] same thing here, but with the elderly Kissimmee crowd. [“Mickey’s Philharmagic”] will play pretty good [with the regular] guests, but only for three or four years.
Overall, I liked [the show] and would wait as much as 10 minutes to see it again.
You see what I’m saying here, folks? This is pretty tepid praise. I mean, individual characters and sequences got pretty high marks. But the show as a whole seemed to be somewhat … underwhelming. None of the people who e-mailed me this past weekend about “Mickey’s Philharmagic” really sang the show’s praises. By that I mean: They all liked the Magic Kingdom’s newest attraction. They just didn’t love it.
So — sadly — it appears that this new Magic Kingdom attraction won’t the smash hit that Disney had hoped it would be. The Mouse’s 3D movie that was supposed to have kicked “Shrek 4D”‘s butt. (Just so you know: Universal’s newest attraction is still supposedly racking up incredibly high marks on guest satisfaction surveys at that park. Many USF visitors reportedly consider “Shrek 4D” to be a much better show than that theme park’s previous top vote getter, “Men in Black: Alien Attack.”)
And given that Disney Company executives had reportedly been counting on “Mickey’s Philharmagic” becoming the corporation’s next big franchise (I.E. a new attraction that could be dropped — virtually unchanged — into any of the Disney theme parks worldwide), I got to wondering if the somewhat underwhelming reaction to the Central Florida version of the show would put the kibosh on “MP” going global.
So — with that question in mind — I called my super secret source at WDI, Deep Mouse. After I started peppering the poor guy with questions about “Mickey’s Philharmagic,” there was this long sigh at the other end of the line … followed by a prolonged explanation.
“You have to understand, Jim,” said Deep Mouse. “That ‘Mickey’s Philharmagic’ wasn’t supposed to debut at Disney World. This 3D movie was initially supposed to have had its world premiere at Hong Kong Disneyland. In a brand-new theater that would have been built specifically to support this attraction. With a lobby and a pre-show area that would have done a marvelous job of setting the stage for the film that was to follow.”
“But sometime over the past two years, the guys in Team Disney Burbank suddenly changed their minds. Instead of bowing in the Orient, ‘Mickey’s Philharmagic’ would now have its world premiere in Orlando. Several years ahead of schedule. In a retrofitted facility. With little or no theming in the lobby. And with no pre-show.”
“And keep in mind that the Fantasyland facility that ‘Mickey’s Philharmagic’ was shoe-horned into hasn’t ever really worked. Back in 1971, ‘The Mickey Mouse Revue’ didn’t play well in this theater. Nor did ‘Magic Journeys’ in 1988 or ‘The Legend of the Lion King’ in 1994. So I don’t see how the suits expect ‘Philharmagic’ to suddenly turn this situation around in 2003.”
“That Fantasyland Theater is a really poorly designed facility, Jim. The pre-show area there is infamous for not being able to accommodate all the bodies you need in order to fill all of the seats in that house. So you’re behind the eight ball even before you get started here. This is why each of the shows that previously played here never ever met their theoretical hourly capacity. Which is why WDW management was always turning to WDI — every five to ten years or so — and asking us to come up with a brand new show for the Fantasyland Theater at Walt Disney World.”
“It’s a real shame that Disney opted to premiere ‘Philharmagic’ at Disney World, Jim. It really is a cute little show that a lot of people here and at Feature Animation worked very hard on. It really deserved better than this.”
“By rolling the show out in Orlando first — rather than holding ‘Philharmagic’ for Hong Kong Disneyland, where it could have opened in 2006 in a brand new theater that was specifically designed for the show — Disney may have unintentionally cut the legs out from under this potentially quite lucrative theme park franchise. Which is a shame. Not to mention a really stupid business decision.”
“After all, a jewel only looks its best in the proper setting,” Deep Mouse concluded. “And the Fantasyland Theater is NOT the proper setting for ‘Mickey’s Philharmagic.'”
As I was listening to Deep Mouse speak, I found it extremely interesting that this unnamed Imagineer would bring up “Shrek 4D.” For — in a way — this new Universal Studios attraction was the prime example of how placing a new theme park attraction in the right (or wrong) facility can really impact how the public comes to view that particular show.
Take — for instance — the version of “Shrek 4D” that’ was set up at Universal Studios Florida earlier this year. It’s housed inside of that theme park’s old “Alfred Hitchcock: The Art of Making Movies” facility with lots of highly detailed props and signs to entertain USF visitors as they wait in line. All this witty material — plus the clever pre-show that follows — really put guests in the proper mood to enjoy “Shrek 4D.” Which is why people who visit Universal Studios Florida — as they exit this attraction — always give the park’s new 3D movie extremely high marks.
Now contrast that with what happened on the other side of the country. Where Universal Studios Hollywood officials opted to drop their version of “Shrek 4D” into a facility that really wasn’t suited for showing a 3D film: the slightly retooled “Rugrats Magic Adventure” theater. Since this HSH upper lot venue had only an outdoor queue area until earlier this year, it was really hard to find a way to showcase all the signs and props that Universal Creative had created to set a proper tone of the show. Not to mention all the problems involved with finding a place to present “Shrek 4D”‘s pre-show film.
The end result? Universal theme park visitors on the West Coast like “Shrek 4D” quite a bit. But not nearly as much as the folks who see the same show in Central Florida do. Mind you, it’s the same exact 3D movie. Not a frame has been changed. But Universal Orlando’s guest satisfaction survey results clearly show that USF guests think that “Shrek 4D” is a much more entertaining show that theme park visitors in Hollywood do.
So maybe what Deep Mouse is saying is true. Maybe we’re all going to have to wait ’til “Mickey’s Philharmagic” opens at Hong Kong Disneyland in late 2005 / early 2006 before we can see if this new 3D movie actually lives up to its hype.
Of course, I could be jumping the gun here. Maybe some of you JHM readers also got to see this new Disney World show during its preview period last week. And maybe your opinion of this new 3D film is markedly from what Seabiscuit, My Friend Flicka and Mr. Ed had to say. If so, we’d love to hear from you. So drop us a line here at the site and let us know if you thought “Philharmagic” was really magical or not.
In the meantime … well, I’ll hope and pray that “Wishes,” Steve Davison’s brand-new fireworks extravaganza (soft opening scheduled for October 6th, official world premiere on October 8th) actually delivers the goods. Otherwise, we may all have to wait ’til the Fall of 2004 (when the”Stitch”-ified version of “Alien Encounter” is supposed to debut) before there’s a good enough reason to schedule a return trip to WDW’s Magic Kingdom.
Your thoughts?
Television & Shows
The Untold Story of Super Soap Weekend at Disney-MGM Studios: How Daytime TV Took Over the Parks

A long time ago in a galaxy that … Well, to be honest, wasn’t all that far away. This was down in Florida after all. But if you traveled to the WDW Resort, you could then experience “Star Wars Weekends.” Which ran seasonally at Disney’s Hollywood Studios Disney World from 1997 to 2015.
Mind you, what most folks don’t remember is the annual event that effectively plowed the road for “Star Wars Weekends.” Which was “Super Soap Weekend.” That seasonal offering — which allowed ABC soap fans to get up-close with their favorite performers from “All My Children,” “General Hospital,” “One Life to Live” and “Port Charles” — debuted at that same theme park the year previous (1996).
So how did this weekend-long celebration of daytime drama (which drew tens of thousands of people to Orlando every Fall for 15 years straight) come to be?
Michael Eisner’s Daytime TV Origins and a Theme Park Vision
Super Soap Weekend was the brainchild of then-Disney CEO Michael Eisner. His career in media began with short stints at NBC and CBS, but it truly took off in 1964 when he joined ABC as the assistant to Leonard Goldberg, who was the network’s national programming director at the time.
Eisner quickly advanced through the ranks. By 1971, he had become Vice President of Daytime Programming at ABC. That meant he was on the scene when One Life to Live joined the lineup in July 1968 and when All My Children made its debut in January 1970. Even after being promoted to Senior Vice President of Prime Time Programming in 1976, Eisner stayed close to the daytime division and often recruited standout soap talent for ABC’s primetime shows.
Fast forward nearly two decades to July 31, 1995. The Walt Disney Company announced that it would acquire ABC/Cap Cities in a $19 billion deal. Although the acquisition wasn’t finalized until February 1996, Eisner was already thinking ahead. He wanted to use the stars of All My Children, One Life to Live, and General Hospital to draw people to Disney’s theme parks.
He had seen how individual soap stars were drawing huge mall crowds across America since the late 1970s. Now he wanted to bring dozens of them together for something much bigger.

Super Soap Weekend Takes Over Disney-MGM Studios
The very first Super Soap Weekend was announced in June 1996, just a few months after the ABC deal closed. The event was scheduled for October 19 and 20 at Disney-MGM Studios and was a massive success.
The weekend featured panel discussions, autograph sessions, and photo opportunities with the stars of ABC’s daytime dramas. Thousands of fans packed the park for the chance to meet their favorite actors. Due to the overwhelming response, the event became an annual tradition and was eventually moved to Veterans Day weekend each November to better accommodate attendees.
Longtime fans like Nancy Stadler, her mom Mary, and their close friend Angela Ragno returned year after year, making the event a personal tradition and building lifelong memories.




West Coast Events and the ABC Soap Opera Bistro
Disney even tried to recreate the event out west. Two Super Soap Weekends were held at Disneyland Resort, one in April 2002 and another in June 2003.
At Disney’s California Adventure, Eisner also introduced the ABC Soap Opera Bistro, a themed dining experience that opened in February 2001. Guests could dine inside recreated sets from shows like General Hospital and All My Children, including Kelly’s Diner and the Chandler Mansion. The Bistro closed in November 2002, but for fans, it offered a rare opportunity to step into the world of their favorite soaps.
SOAPnet, Port Charles, and the Expansion of Daytime TV at Disney
Eisner’s enthusiasm for soaps extended beyond the parks. In January 2000, he launched SOAPnet, a cable channel dedicated to prime time replays of ABC’s daytime dramas.
During his time at Disney, General Hospital also received a spin-off series titled Port Charles, which aired from June 1997 to October 2003. The show leaned into supernatural plotlines and was another example of Eisner’s commitment to evolving and expanding the soap genre.
The Final Curtain for Super Soap Weekend
In September 2005, Eisner stepped down after 21 years as head of The Walt Disney Company. Bob Iger, who had previously served as President of ABC and Chief Operating Officer of ABC/Cap Cities, took over as CEO. While Iger had deep ABC credentials, he didn’t share Eisner’s passion for daytime television.
In the fall of 2008, Disney hosted the final Super Soap Weekend at what was then still called Disney-MGM Studios. That same year, the park was rebranded as Disney’s Hollywood Studios, and Disney began shifting away from television-focused experiences.
Within the next five years, the rest of Eisner’s soap legacy faded. One Life to Live was canceled in January 2012. SOAPnet was rebranded as Disney Junior in February 2013. Later that year, All My Children ended its 41-year run on ABC.
Only General Hospital remains on the network today, the last standing soap from the golden age of ABC Daytime.
A New Chapter for Daytime TV and Super Soap Fans
The soap genre may have faded from its former glory, but it’s not gone. On February 24, 2025, CBS premiered a brand-new daytime drama called Beyond the Gates, marking the first new soap launch in years.
Meanwhile, All My Children alum Kelly Ripa has been actively working on a revival. In September 2024, she mentioned a holiday-themed movie set in Pine Valley that would bring back many original cast members. The project was in development for Lifetime, though its current status is unclear.
And what about Super Soap? Fans like Nancy and Angela still hope Disney will bring it back. Even if it only featured the cast of General Hospital, it would be a welcome return for longtime viewers who miss that one weekend a year where the magic of Disney collided with the drama of daytime TV.
If you want to hear firsthand what it was like to be part of Super Soap Weekend, be sure to listen to our I Want That Too podcast interview with actor Colin Egglesfield. He shares behind-the-scenes memories from his days as Josh Madden on All My Children and what it meant to be part of one of the most unique fan events in Disney park history.
History
The Super Bowl & Disney: The Untold Story Behind ‘I’m Going to Disneyland!’

One of the highlights of the Super Bowl isn’t just the game itself—it’s the moment when the winning quarterback turns to the camera and exclaims, “I’m going to Disney World!” This now-iconic phrase has been a staple of post-game celebrations for decades. But where did this tradition begin? Surprisingly, it didn’t originate in a stadium but at a dinner table in 1987, in a conversation involving Michael Eisner, George Lucas, and aviation pioneers Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager.

The Unlikely Beginning of a Marketing Sensation
To understand the origins of this campaign, we have to go back to December 1986, when the Rutan Voyager became the first aircraft to fly around the world without stopping or refueling. Pilots Dick Rutan and Jeana Yeager completed the nine-day journey on December 23, 1986, flying over 26,000 miles before landing at Edwards Air Force Base. Their historic achievement earned them national recognition, and just days later, President Ronald Reagan awarded them the Presidential Citizen Medal at the White House.
Meanwhile, Disney was gearing up for the grand opening of Star Tours at Disneyland, set for January 12, 1987. Following its usual playbook of associating major theme park attractions with real-world pioneers, Disney’s PR team invited astronauts Gordon Cooper and Deke Slayton to the launch event. But in a twist, they also invited Rutan and Yeager, who were still making headlines.

A Dinner Conversation That Changed Advertising Forever
After the Star Tours opening ceremony, a private dinner was held with Disney CEO Michael Eisner, George Lucas, and Eisner’s wife, Jane. During the meal, Eisner asked Rutan and Yeager, “You just made history. You traveled non-stop around the planet on a plane without ever refueling. How are you ever going to top that, career-wise? What are you two gonna do next?”
Without hesitation, Jeana Yeager replied, “Well, after being cramped inside that tiny plane for nine days, I’m just glad to be anywhere else. And even though you folks were nice enough to fly us here, invite us to your party… Well, as soon as we finish eating, I’m gonna go over to the Park and ride some rides. I’m going to Disneyland.”
Jane Eisner immediately recognized the power of Yeager’s statement. On the car ride home, she turned to Michael and said, “That’s a great slogan. I think you should use that to promote the theme parks.” Like many husbands, Michael initially dismissed the idea, but Jane persisted. Eventually, Eisner relented and pitched it to his team.
The Super Bowl Connection
With Super Bowl XXI just around the corner, Disney’s PR team saw an opportunity. The game was set for January 25, 1987, at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena—just miles from Disney Studios. What if they convinced the winning quarterback to say, “I’m going to Disneyland” live on-air?
Disney quickly struck a deal with both quarterbacks—Phil Simms of the New York Giants and John Elway of the Denver Broncos—offering each $75,000 to deliver the line if their team won. Simms led the Giants to victory, making history as the first athlete to say, “I’m going to Disney World!” on national television.
A Marketing Triumph
That year’s Super Bowl had the second-highest viewership in television history, with 87 million people watching Simms say the famous line. The next day, Disney turned the clip into a national commercial, cementing the phrase as a marketing goldmine.
Since then, “I’m going to Disneyland” (or Disney World, depending on the commercial) has been a staple of championship celebrations, spanning the NFL, NBA, and even the Olympics. What started as a casual remark at dinner became one of the most successful advertising campaigns in history.
A Lasting Legacy
Jane Eisner’s keen instinct and Disney’s ability to act quickly on a great idea created a tradition that continues to captivate audiences. The “I’m going to Disneyland” campaign remains a testament to the power of spontaneous inspiration and smart marketing, proving that sometimes, the best ideas come from the most unexpected places.
To learn more about Disney’s ties to the world of sports, check out I Want That Too: A Disney History and Consumer Product Podcast.
Television & Shows
How the Creators of South Park Tricked A-List Celebrities to Roast Universal – “Your Studio & You”

Universal Studios has a rich and storied history, but few moments are as peculiar—and as hilariously cutting—as the creation of Your Studio & You. This 14-minute parody film, commissioned in 1995 to celebrate Universal’s new ownership under Seagram’s, brings together an all-star cast, biting humor, and the unmistakable comedic fingerprints of Matt Stone and Trey Parker.
Long before South Park debuted on Comedy Central in 1997, Stone and Parker were already carving out a reputation for their irreverent style, and Your Studio & You perfectly encapsulates their knack for turning even the most corporate project into something delightfully subversive.
Matt Stone & Trey Parker Before South Park
Stone & Parker were already known out in Hollywood as funny guys. Thanks largely to “The Spirit of Christmas,” which was this video greeting card that they’d crafted for a Fox executive – who then distributed this infamously funny thing (which had Our Lord Jesus Christ & Santa Claus literally duking it out for the holiday affections of Cartman, Kenny, Stan & Kyle) to friends & family.
This was the early 1990s. No internet. Each copy of “The Spirit of Christmas” was made on VHS tape and then mailed. Went viral the old-fashioned way. It’s rumored that George Clooney made over 300 copies of “The Spirit of Christmas” and passed these VHS taps along to friends and family.
Things didn’t move as fast as they do today. “The Spirit of Christmas” still became a sensation out West.
Zucker Brothers
Matt & Trey also had other supporters in the entertainment industry. Among them David Zucker, who was one of the members of ZAZ (i.e., Zucker Abrahams Zucker), the talented trio that made “Airplane!” in 1980, “Top Secret!” in 1984 and the three “Naked Gun” movies.
- The original “Naked Gun” in 1988
- “Naked Gun 2 & 1/2 : The Smell of Fear” in 1991
- and “Naked Gun 33 & a 1/3: The Final Insult” in 1994
All five of these parody films had been made for Paramount Pictures. But in the Late Winter / Early Spring of 1995, Universal had persuaded the Zucker Brothers to come over and set up shop in a bungalow on their lower lot. With the hope that – at some point further on down the line – David & his brother Jerry would start making funny films for Universal.

And it’s during this same window of time (We’re now talking April of 1995) that news breaks that Seagrams (Yep, the adult beverage company. Who – at the time – was making an absolute fortune on the sales of wine coolers) was about to buy a majority stake in MCAUniversal. We’re talking control of 80% of that company’s stock. Which would effectively make Seagrams the new owners of Universal Studios.
Edgar Bronfman
And Edgar Bronfman – the owner of Seagrams – knew that Universal had had a tough time with its previous owners – which had been the Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. of Japan. Matsushita had bought MCA back in November of 1990 for $7.5 billion but had never really understood the entertainment industry.
This is why – after repeatedly butting heads with Lew Wasserman & Sidney Sheinberg (i.e., the heads of Universal Studios & the Universal theme park respectively) when it came to creative control of this company – Matsushita decided to wash it hands of the entire enterprise. Agreeing to sell their holdings in MCA to Seagrams for $5.7 billion (effectively taking a nearly $2 billion loss on this investment).

And Bronfman … He knew that some bad feeling had developed between Hollywood’s creative community and the Japanese owners of Universal. The thinking was that executives at Matsushita Electric had just not gotten what it took to make movies & TV shows.
And Edgar? Right from the get-go, he wanted to show that Seagrams was NOT going to be Matsushita Electric Redux. Bronfman was looking for a way to send a clear message to Hollywood’s creative community that Universal’s new owners got it. That they were willing to work with Hollywood to make the best possible movies & TV shows at Universal.
And how did Edgar decide to get this message across? By making a funny movie.
Zucker Commissions Trey Parker for “Your Studio & You”
Mind you, Bronfman himself didn’t make this film. The owner of Seagrams reached out to David Zucker. Who – after initially agreeing to produce this introduction-to-Universal film – then farmed out the production of the actual project to Trey Parker. Who – just two days before shooting was supposed to star on the Universal Lot – persuaded Matt Stone to come help him on this project.
Which brings us to “Your Studio and You.” Which is a parody of an educational film from the 1950s, right down to being shot in black & white and featuring a very generic soundtrack.
Now what’s amazing about watching “Your Studio and You” today is that this 14-minute-long film features some of the biggest names working in Hollywood back in the mid-1990s. We’re talking about people like recent Golden Globe winner Demi Moore, Sylvester Stallone, Michael J. Fox and Angela Lansbury. Not to mention two of the most powerful men in all of Hollywood, Steven Spielberg & Jeffrey Katzenberg.
And what’s especially interesting about watch “Your Studio and You” is that – as you watch these performers go through their paces in this motion pictures (which – most of the time – involves doing some innocuous task while holding a Seagram’s wine cooler) – you often get the feeling that this star is not in on the gag.
So how did Matt & Trey get away with this? Simple. There was never actually a script for “Your Studio and You.”
Filming “Your Studio & You” at Universal Studios Hollywood
Mind you, David Zucker would always insist that there was. Especially when he’d phone up celebrities on the Universal Lot and say “Hey, I’m sending over a couple of college kids later today. They’re working with me on a new parody film. It’s something that we’re doing for the new owners of Universal. I need just a half hour of your time. We’re shooting something special for the party we’ll be holding when the Seagrams people first arrive at the Studio. Absolutely. You’ll definitely get an invite to that party. So can I count on you to help these kids out? Beautiful. They’ll be over there later this morning.”
And then Matt & Trey would show up and say “… Dang, Miss Lansbury. We’re sorry. We must have left our copy of the ‘Your Studio and You’ script back in our office. Which is clear on the other side of the Lot. So – rather than waste your time – why don’t we do this instead? Follow us over to the Psycho House. Where we’re then going to get footage of you painting the front porch on Mother Bates’ house while you say ‘Gosh, with all of the wonderful improvements going on around here, everyone is going to want to work at Universal.’ Oh, and can we also get you to wear this button on the front of your blazer which reads ‘Universal is A-OK’ ? “

And over & over again, the biggest names who were working for Universal at that time took part in the production of “Your Studio & You” because A) David Zucker vouched for Matt Stone & Trey Parker and B) this was something that was being made for the new owners of Universal. And it’s just natural to want to get in good with the new boss.
Steven Spielberg, Jeffery Katzenberg, and Jaws
But no one at Universal anticipated that “Your Studio & You” would wind up being as sharp edged as the finished product turned out to be. I mean, it’s one thing to bite the hand that feeds you. But “Your Studio & You” ? It doesn’t just bite the hand. It takes the hand off at the wrist.
It’s a brutally funny film. With one of the meanest moments reserved for Steven Spielberg, who plays a driver on the Universal Studio Tour who’s trying to persuade a tram full of bored tourists (one of whom is played by Jeffery Katzenberg) that the “Shark Attack” scene down by Jaws Lagoon is actually exciting.
Spielberg actually says lines like “ … Whoa, whoa. What is going on here? Ladies and gentlemen, this never happens. Look out! It’s a shark! Whoa, that is one big scary shark.”

Mind you, as footage of this mechanical shark repeatedly coming up out of the water is shown, “Your Studio & You” ‘s off-screen narrator (who is voiced by Trey Parker says):
“But what about tomorrow? If we don’t keep in step with the times, things that were once neat and thrilling can become old and stupid.”
“Your Studio & You” Reception
This film was supposed to be shown only once at the welcoming party for Seagrams executive on the Universal Lot. And I’m told that – when Edgar Bronfman saw the finished product at that party – he reportedly turned to David Zucker and said “ … That’s a little more mean-spirited that I think it needed to be.”
And with that, “Your Studio & You” was supposed to go back into the Universal vault, never to be seen again. But when “South Park” debuted on Comedy Central in August of 1997 and then became a sensation for its biting humor, there was suddenly a lot of interest in what else Matt & Trey had done. Which is why copies of “The Spirit of Christmas” began to circulate. And – over time – copies of “Your Studio & You” began to bubble up.
Which – as Stone & Parker have repeatedly pointed out – was just not supposed to happen. Largely because none of the celebrities who appeared in “Your Studio & You” had never signed releases for Universal’s legal department. Because – again – this was for a movie that was only going to be shown once at a private function on the Universal Lot.
Matt mentioned (as part of a career retrospective at the Paley Center in LA back in 2000) that “ … they wouldn’t even let us keep a copy of the finished film.”
It’s a funny but brutal movie. And worth taking a look at today especially if you’re a theme park history buff because it shows Universal Studios Hollywood’s “Jurassic Park: The Ride” still under construction on the Lower Lot. That attraction would finally open to the public in June of 1996.
“Your Studio & You” became a lot easier to see after Seagrams sold off its share of Universal to Vivendi in 2000. Copies began propagating online after that. Though Universal Legal will periodically make an effort to get the latest copy of “Your Studio & You” taken off the Internet because – again – none of the performers who appear on camera ever signed the proper releases and/or were paid for their efforts.
That said, if you’re up for a mean-spirited laugh, “Your Studio & You” is well worth 14 minutes of your time. That said, once you watch this thing, be warned:
- You’re immediately going to be thirsty for a Seagram’s wine cooler
- And you’re going to have a sudden desire to go out & buy a porcelain deer.
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment8 months ago
Disney’s Forgotten Halloween Event: The Original Little Monsters on Main Street
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment8 months ago
The Story of Mickey’s Not-So-Scary Halloween Party: From One Night to a Halloween Family Tradition
-
Film & Movies8 months ago
How “An American Tail” Led to Disney’s “Hocus Pocus”
-
Theme Parks & Themed Entertainment6 months ago
Disney and Macy’s 90-Year Thanksgiving Day Parade Partnership: From Mickey’s First Balloon to Minnie’s Big Debut
-
Television & Shows4 months ago
How the Creators of South Park Tricked A-List Celebrities to Roast Universal – “Your Studio & You”
-
History3 months ago
The Super Bowl & Disney: The Untold Story Behind ‘I’m Going to Disneyland!’
-
Podcast1 month ago
Epic Universal Podcast – Aztec Dancers, Mariachis, Tequila, and Ceremonial Sacrifices?! (Ep. 45)
-
Television & Shows3 weeks ago
The Untold Story of Super Soap Weekend at Disney-MGM Studios: How Daytime TV Took Over the Parks